Literature DB >> 18632557

A germ-line-selective advantage rather than an increased mutation rate can explain some unexpectedly common human disease mutations.

Soo-Kyung Choi1, Song-Ro Yoon, Peter Calabrese, Norman Arnheim.   

Abstract

Two nucleotide substitutions in the human FGFR2 gene (C755G or C758G) are responsible for virtually all sporadic cases of Apert syndrome. This condition is 100-1,000 times more common than genomic mutation frequency data predict. Here, we report on the C758G de novo Apert syndrome mutation. Using data on older donors, we show that spontaneous mutations are not uniformly distributed throughout normal testes. Instead, we find foci where C758G mutation frequencies are 3-4 orders of magnitude greater than the remaining tissue. We conclude this nucleotide site is not a mutation hot spot even after accounting for possible Luria-Delbruck "mutation jackpots." An alternative explanation for such foci involving positive selection acting on adult self-renewing Ap spermatogonia experiencing the rare mutation could not be rejected. Further, the two youngest individuals studied (19 and 23 years old) had lower mutation frequencies and smaller foci at both mutation sites compared with the older individuals. This implies that the mutation frequency of foci increases as adults age, and thus selection could explain the paternal age effect for Apert syndrome and other genetic conditions. Our results, now including the analysis of two mutations in the same set of testes, suggest that positive selection can increase the relative frequency of premeiotic germ cells carrying such mutations, although individuals who inherit them have reduced fitness. In addition, we compared the anatomical distribution of C758G mutation foci with both new and old data on the C755G mutation in the same testis and found their positions were not correlated with one another.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18632557      PMCID: PMC2474563          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0801267105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  40 in total

Review 1.  The origins, patterns and implications of human spontaneous mutation.

Authors:  J F Crow
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 53.242

2.  Germ cell selection in genetic mosaics in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  C Extavour; A García-Bellido
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-09-25       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Estimate of the mutation rate per nucleotide in humans.

Authors:  M W Nachman; S L Crowell
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 4.  Asymmetric and symmetric stem-cell divisions in development and cancer.

Authors:  Sean J Morrison; Judith Kimble
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-06-29       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  Spermatogonial stem cells: questions, models and perspectives.

Authors:  Jens Ehmcke; Joachim Wistuba; Stefan Schlatt
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2006-01-30       Impact factor: 15.610

6.  Fibroblast growth factor receptor 2, gain-of-function mutations, and tumourigenesis: investigating a potential link.

Authors:  Ruth M S Hansen; Anne Goriely; Steven A Wall; Ian S D Roberts; Andrew O M Wilkie
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 7.996

Review 7.  Cellular signaling by fibroblast growth factor receptors.

Authors:  V P Eswarakumar; I Lax; J Schlessinger
Journal:  Cytokine Growth Factor Rev       Date:  2005-02-01       Impact factor: 7.638

8.  Oncogenic properties of the mutated forms of fibroblast growth factor receptor 3b.

Authors:  Isabelle Bernard-Pierrot; Aude Brams; Claire Dunois-Lardé; Aurélie Caillault; Sixtina Gil Diez de Medina; David Cappellen; Gabriel Graff; Jean Paul Thiery; Dominique Chopin; David Ricol; François Radvanyi
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2005-12-07       Impact factor: 4.944

9.  Paternal origin of FGFR2 mutations in sporadic cases of Crouzon syndrome and Pfeiffer syndrome.

Authors:  R L Glaser; W Jiang; S A Boyadjiev; A K Tran; A A Zachary; L Van Maldergem; D Johnson; S Walsh; M Oldridge; S A Wall; A O Wilkie; E W Jabs
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  The observed human sperm mutation frequency cannot explain the achondroplasia paternal age effect.

Authors:  Irene Tiemann-Boege; William Navidi; Raji Grewal; Dan Cohn; Brenda Eskenazi; Andrew J Wyrobek; Norman Arnheim
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-10-23       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  39 in total

Review 1.  Genome analyses substantiate male mutation bias in many species.

Authors:  Melissa A Wilson Sayres; Kateryna D Makova
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 4.345

2.  Causes and evolutionary consequences of primordial germ-cell specification mode in metazoans.

Authors:  Carrie A Whittle; Cassandra G Extavour
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Contributions of intrinsic mutation rate and selfish selection to levels of de novo HRAS mutations in the paternal germline.

Authors:  Eleni Giannoulatou; Gilean McVean; Indira B Taylor; Simon J McGowan; Geoffrey J Maher; Zamin Iqbal; Susanne P Pfeifer; Isaac Turner; Emma M M Burkitt Wright; Jennifer Shorto; Aysha Itani; Karen Turner; Lorna Gregory; David Buck; Ewa Rajpert-De Meyts; Leendert H J Looijenga; Bronwyn Kerr; Andrew O M Wilkie; Anne Goriely
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Advanced paternal age and reproductive outcome.

Authors:  Zofnat Wiener-Megnazi; Ron Auslender; Martha Dirnfeld
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 3.285

5.  Genetic Mosaicism in Calmodulinopathy.

Authors:  Lisa M Wren; Juan Jiménez-Jáimez; Saleh Al-Ghamdi; Jumana Y Al-Aama; Amnah Bdeir; Zuhair N Al-Hassnan; Jyn L Kuan; Roger Y Foo; Franck Potet; Christopher N Johnson; Miriam C Aziz; Gemma L Carvill; Juan-Pablo Kaski; Lia Crotti; Francesca Perin; Lorenzo Monserrat; Paul W Burridge; Peter J Schwartz; Walter J Chazin; Zahurul A Bhuiyan; Alfred L George
Journal:  Circ Genom Precis Med       Date:  2019-08-27

Review 6.  How computational models contribute to our understanding of the germ line.

Authors:  Kathryn Atwell; Sara-Jane Dunn; James M Osborne; Hillel Kugler; E Jane Albert Hubbard
Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 2.609

7.  The ups and downs of mutation frequencies during aging can account for the Apert syndrome paternal age effect.

Authors:  Song-Ro Yoon; Jian Qin; Rivka L Glaser; Ethylin Wang Jabs; Nancy S Wexler; Rebecca Sokol; Norman Arnheim; Peter Calabrese
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 5.917

8.  Evidence that replication-associated mutation alone does not explain between-chromosome differences in substitution rates.

Authors:  Catherine J Pink; Siva K Swaminathan; Ian Dunham; Jane Rogers; Andrew Ward; Laurence D Hurst
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 3.416

9.  Germline and somatic mosaicism for FGFR2 mutation in the mother of a child with Crouzon syndrome: Implications for genetic testing in "paternal age-effect" syndromes.

Authors:  Anne Goriely; Helen Lord; Jasmine Lim; David Johnson; Tracy Lester; Helen V Firth; Andrew O M Wilkie
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.802

10.  Activating mutations in FGFR3 and HRAS reveal a shared genetic origin for congenital disorders and testicular tumors.

Authors:  Anne Goriely; Ruth M S Hansen; Indira B Taylor; Inge A Olesen; Grete Krag Jacobsen; Simon J McGowan; Susanne P Pfeifer; Gilean A T McVean; Ewa Rajpert-De Meyts; Andrew O M Wilkie
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2009-10-25       Impact factor: 38.330

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.