Literature DB >> 18632532

Hepatic malignancies: percutaneous radiofrequency ablation during percutaneous portal or hepatic vein occlusion.

Thierry de Baere1, Frederic Deschamps, Patricio Briggs, Clarisse Dromain, Valérie Boige, Lukas Hechelhammer, Mohamed Abdel-Rehim, Anne Aupérin, Diane Goere, Dominique Elias.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate the technical feasibility, effectiveness, and complications of percutaneous radiofrequency (RF) ablation for hepatic malignancies during temporary percutaneous balloon occlusion (PBO) of a large hepatic or portal vein.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: During a 4-year period, RF ablation was performed in 201 patients (106 men, 95 women; age range, 41-88 years) with 233 liver tumors. Institutional review board approval was obtained to attempt RF ablation during PBO for 18 tumors that were larger than 35 mm (mean, 43 mm +/- 7.6 [standard deviation]; range, 36-60 mm) and did not abut a portal or hepatic vein 4 mm in diameter or larger (group 1), 58 tumors 35 mm or smaller (mean, 23 mm +/- 7.3; range, 12-35 mm) that abutted a large vessel (group 2), and 20 tumors that were both larger than 35 mm (mean, 42 mm +/- 5.7; range, 38-50 mm) and abutted a large vessel (group 3). RF ablation without PBO was performed for 137 tumors 35 mm or smaller (mean, 22 mm +/- 6.8; range, 9-35 mm) and remote from large vessels (group 4). Rate of local tumor progression was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method, and tumor progression-free rates were compared between the four groups with the log-rank test. Complications were compared by using the Fisher exact test between the four groups and between the two RF devices used.
RESULTS: PBO was achieved in 94 of 96 attempts (98%), including 64 of 64 hepatic veins and 30 of 32 portal branches. After a mean follow-up of 18 months +/- 9, 10 tumors in eight patients were lost to follow-up. Local tumor progression was observed in six (40%) of 15 tumors in group 1, in six (11%) of 56 tumors in group 2, in eight (40%) of 20 tumors in group 3, and in 12 (9%) of 130 tumors in group 4. Combined analysis of tumor size and the use of PBO showed that size was the only prognostic factor for tumor progression, with a hazard ratio of 4.9 (95% confidence interval: 2.4, 9.9) (P < .001). There were no differences between groups 2 and 4. Asymptomatic, transient postprocedure venous thrombosis was seen in nine of 94 RF ablations with PBO, while occlusion of one permanent portal branch induced segmental liver atrophy. There were no differences in rates of complications (5% and 6% for RF ablation with and that without PBO, respectively).
CONCLUSION: RF ablation with PBO provides tumor control for tumors smaller than 35 mm in diameter that abut vessels 4 mm or larger, equivalent to tumor control of the same-size tumors away from vessels. PBO does not seem to affect the results of RF ablation for tumors 35 mm or larger. RSNA, 2008

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18632532     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2483070222

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  13 in total

1.  Effect of interval between transcatheter hepatic arterial embolization and radiofrequency ablation on ablated lesion size in a swine model.

Authors:  Cao Guang; Nobuyuki Kawai; Morio Sato; Isao Takasaka; Hiroki Minamiguchi; Shinya Sahara; Kouhei Nakata; Tetsuo Sonomura; Shintaro Shirai; Ichiro Mori; Renjie Yang
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 2.374

2.  Ablative zone size created by radiofrequency ablation with and without chemoembolization in small hepatocellular carcinomas.

Authors:  Takashi Yamanaka; Koichiro Yamakado; Haruyuki Takaki; Atsuhiro Nakatsuka; Katsuya Shiraki; Hiroshi Hasegawa; Yoshiyuki Takei; Kan Takeda
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2012-05-19       Impact factor: 2.374

3.  Percutaneous Microwave versus Radiofrequency Ablation of Colorectal Liver Metastases: Ablation with Clear Margins (A0) Provides the Best Local Tumor Control.

Authors:  Waleed Shady; Elena N Petre; Kinh Gian Do; Mithat Gonen; Hooman Yarmohammadi; Karen T Brown; Nancy E Kemeny; Michael D'Angelica; Peter T Kingham; Stephen B Solomon; Constantinos T Sofocleous
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 3.464

4.  Current status of radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Hyunchul Rhim; Hyo K Lim; Dongil Choi
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-04-27

5.  Radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma: pros and cons.

Authors:  Hyunchul Rhim; Hyo K Lim
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 4.519

6.  Radiofrequency hyperthermia-enhanced herpes simplex virus-thymidine kinase/ganciclovir direct intratumoral gene therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Jianfeng Wang; Yaoping Shi; Zhibin Bai; Yonggang Li; Longhua Qiu; Guy Johnson; Feng Zhang; Xiaoming Yang
Journal:  Int J Hyperthermia       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 3.914

7.  Microwave Thermoablation of Colorectal Liver Metastases Close to Large Hepatic Vessels Under Pringle Maneuver Minimizes the "Heat Sink Effect".

Authors:  R Rhaiem; R Kianmanesh; M Minon; A Tashkandi; A Aghaei; G Ledoux; Ch Hoeffel; O Bouche; D Sommacale; T Piardi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Large-volume multi-tined expandable RF ablation in pig livers: comparison of 2D and volumetric measurements of the ablation zone.

Authors:  Christopher Bangard; Silvia Rösgen; Roger Wahba; Rafael Wiemker; Martin Hellmich; Hannah Reiter; Jürgen H Fischer; Dirk L Stippel; Klaus J Lackner
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-11-14       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Combination of intraoperative radiofrequency ablation and surgical resection for treatment of cholangiocarcinoma: feasibility and long-term survival.

Authors:  Sang Min Lee; Heung Kyu Ko; Ji Hoon Shin; Jin-Hyoung Kim; Hee Ho Chu
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.630

Review 10.  Combination of ablation and embolization for intermediate-sized liver metastases from colorectal cancer: what can we learn from treating primary liver cancer?

Authors:  Matthew J Seager; Tobias F Jakobs; Ricky A Sharma; Steve Bandula
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 2.630

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.