Literature DB >> 18630452

Feasibility assessment of a chemoresponse assay to predict pathologic response in neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer patients.

Zhibao Mi1, Frankie A Holmes, Beth Hellerstedt, John Pippen, Rufus Collea, Amanda Backner, Jason E Bush, Holly H Gallion, Alan Wells, Joyce A O'Shaughnessy.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: For chemosensitivity and resistance assays to be clinically useful in predicting patient outcome, they should require small amounts of tissue and be highly reproducible and reliable. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Expanded tumor cells from transcutaneous biopsies of breast lesions (n=62) were tested for chemoresponse using the cell-based ChemoFx assay. Pathologic complete response (pCR) was determined on a subset of patients (n=34). Assay score and pCR were determined independently in a blinded manner. Logistic regression models were used to select predictors for response.
RESULTS: Tumor cells were successfully isolated from 83.9% of patients. Chemoresponse profiles were robust and reproducible with coefficient of variance of <3%. In a limited initial patient outcome correlation, assay score of docetaxel/capecitabine significantly predicted pCR; the cross-validated model was 75% accurate.
CONCLUSION: It is feasible to assess the chemoresponsiveness of small breast lesions using the ChemoFx assay to assist in choosing neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18630452

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anticancer Res        ISSN: 0250-7005            Impact factor:   2.480


  19 in total

1.  Ex vivo construction of human primary 3D-networked osteocytes.

Authors:  Qiaoling Sun; Saba Choudhary; Ciaran Mannion; Yair Kissin; Jenny Zilberberg; Woo Y Lee
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  Chemoresponse Assay in Head and Neck Cancer Patients: A Three-Year Follow Up.

Authors:  Basem T Jamal; Gregory A Grillone; Scharukh Jalisi
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-05-01

3.  Feasibility assessment of in vitro chemoresponse assay on stereotactic biopsies of glioblastoma multiforms: a step towards personalized medicine.

Authors:  Fariba Sadeghi Fazel; Mahnaz Haddadi; Alireza Khoshnevisan; Samad Muhammadnejad; Ahad Muhammadnejad; Zohreh Mazaheri; Motahareh Arjomandnejad; Reza Shirkoohi; Mohammad-Ali Oghabian; Narjes Sherkat-Khameneh; Saeid Amanpour; Monireh Kazemimanesh
Journal:  Iran J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.699

Review 4.  Evolution of Chemosensitivity and Resistance Assays as Predictors of Clinical Outcomes in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Bradley J Monk; Thomas J Herzog; Krishnansu S Tewari
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 3.116

5.  Adaptation of a chemosensitivity assay to accurately assess pemetrexed in ex vivo cultures of lung cancer.

Authors:  Sarah L Suchy; Rodney J Landreneau; Matthew J Schuchert; Dakun Wang; Paul R Ervin; Stacey L Brower
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 4.742

6.  High-throughput dynamic BH3 profiling may quickly and accurately predict effective therapies in solid tumors.

Authors:  Patrick D Bhola; Eman Ahmed; Jennifer L Guerriero; Ewa Sicinska; Emily Su; Elizaveta Lavrova; Jing Ni; Otari Chipashvili; Timothy Hagan; Marissa S Pioso; Kelley McQueeney; Kimmie Ng; Andrew J Aguirre; James M Cleary; David Cocozziello; Alaba Sotayo; Jeremy Ryan; Jean J Zhao; Anthony Letai
Journal:  Sci Signal       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 8.192

Review 7.  Personalized in vitro cancer models to predict therapeutic response: Challenges and a framework for improvement.

Authors:  Molly M Morgan; Brian P Johnson; Megan K Livingston; Linda A Schuler; Elaine T Alarid; Kyung E Sung; David J Beebe
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2016-05-21       Impact factor: 12.310

Review 8.  Current approaches to the management of Her2-negative metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Keerthi Gogineni; Angela DeMichele
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 6.466

9.  Distinct genes related to drug response identified in ER positive and ER negative breast cancer cell lines.

Authors:  Kui Shen; Shara D Rice; David A Gingrich; Dakun Wang; Zhibao Mi; Chunqiao Tian; Zhenyu Ding; Stacey L Brower; Paul R Ervin; Michael J Gabrin; George Tseng; Nan Song
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Ex Vivo Analysis of Primary Tumor Specimens for Evaluation of Cancer Therapeutics.

Authors:  Cristina E Tognon; Rosalie C Sears; Gordon B Mills; Joe W Gray; Jeffrey W Tyner
Journal:  Annu Rev Cancer Biol       Date:  2020-12-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.