Literature DB >> 18629584

Ergonomic assessment of optimum operating table height for hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery.

Sopark Manasnayakorn1, Alfred Cuschieri, George B Hanna.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To investigate the influence of the working surface height on task performance and muscle workload in hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery.
METHODS: The standard task used was closure of 5-cm enterotomy inside a hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery trainer. Surgeons were instructed to place the sutures 3-5 mm apart and from the enterotomy edge. Ten surgeons participated in each experiment and one task was performed with each level. The first experiment compared the quality of task performance and muscle workload with the working surface at: elbow level, 10 cm above, 15 cm above and 10 cm below the elbow. Further narrower levels (5 cm below, at the elbow and 5 cm above the elbow) were investigated in the second experiment. Outcome measures were execution time (s), placement error score (mm), leakage pressure (mmHg), number of execution errors, muscle workload as measured by integrated electromyography (mV x s) and visual analogue score of back discomfort (mm).
RESULTS: The first experiment showed that 15 cm above the elbow level was associated with the longest execution time and similar quality of task performance. This level resulted in a higher workload of the deltoid of the extracorporeal limb, the arm extensor of the intracorporeal side and the trapezius and paraspinal muscles of both intra- and extracorporeal limbs. Also, the 10 cm above the elbow level was associated with increased muscle workload of the deltoid of extracorporeal limb and the trapezius of both limbs compared with the elbow height. The 10 cm below the elbow level was associated with increased back discomfort. The second experiment showed that 5 cm below the elbow height was associated with increased muscle workload of the arm flexor group of the intracorporeal dominant limb.
CONCLUSIONS: The optimum table height for hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery allows the working surface of the extracorporal instrument handle to be at or 5 cm above the elbow level.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18629584     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-008-0068-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  8 in total

1.  An ergonomic study of the optimum operating table height for laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  R Berquer; W D Smith; S Davis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-11-16       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Assessment of the ergonomically optimal operating surface height for laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  M A van Veelen; G Kazemier; J Koopman; R H M Goossens; D W Meijer
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 1.878

3.  A new multitool for hand-assisted advanced laparoscopic surgery (HALS).

Authors:  A Cuschieri; T G Frank; S Brown; D Martin; J L Gove
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-06-25       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Ideal manipulation angle and instrument length in hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  S Manasnayakorn; A Cuschieri; G B Hanna
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-08-18       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Work place design and posture.

Authors:  M M Ayoub
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  1973-06       Impact factor: 2.888

6.  Errors enacted during endoscopic surgery--a human reliability analysis.

Authors:  P Joice; G B Hanna; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.661

7.  Optimal angle between instrument shaft and handle for laparoscopic bowel suturing.

Authors:  Shabeer Ahmed; George B Hanna; Alfred Cuschieri
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2004-01

8.  Identification and categorization of technical errors by Observational Clinical Human Reliability Assessment (OCHRA) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  B Tang; G B Hanna; P Joice; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2004-11
  8 in total
  16 in total

1.  [Analysis of spinal stress during surgery in otolaryngology].

Authors:  M Wunderlich; R Jacob; Y Stelzig; T Rüther; D Leyk
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Microcomplications in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: impact on duration of surgery and costs.

Authors:  Marco von Strauss Und Torney; Salome Dell-Kuster; Henry Hoffmann; Urs von Holzen; Daniel Oertli; Rachel Rosenthal
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  A study of surgeons' postural muscle activity during open, laparoscopic, and endovascular surgery.

Authors:  G P Y Szeto; P Ho; A C W Ting; J T C Poon; R C C Tsang; S W K Cheng
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-12-25       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Ergonomics perspective for identifying and reducing internal operative flow disruption for laparoscopic urological surgery.

Authors:  Latif Al-Hakim; Jiaquan Xiao; Shomik Sengupta
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  The impact of preventable disruption on the operative time for minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  Latif Al-Hakim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Ergonomics in Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Surgery: A Survey of the North American Skull Base Society.

Authors:  Pier Paolo Mattogno; Filippo Marciano; Michael P Catalino; Davide Mattavelli; Paola Cocca; Nicola Francesco Lopomo; Piero Nicolai; Edward R Laws; Ian Witterick; Shaan M Raza; Anand K Devaiah; Liverana Lauretti; Alessandro Olivi; Marco M Fontanella; Fred Gentili; Francesco Doglietto
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2021-05-17

7.  Ergonomics in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Avinash N Supe; Gaurav V Kulkarni; Pradnya A Supe
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.407

Review 8.  Surgical ergonomics for urologists: a practical guide.

Authors:  Andrew T Gabrielson; Marisa M Clifton; Christian P Pavlovich; Michael J Biles; Mitchell Huang; Jacqueline Agnew; Phillip M Pierorazio; Brian R Matlaga; Petar Bajic; Zeyad R Schwen
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 14.432

9.  Comparative Performance in Single-Port Versus Multiport Minimally Invasive Surgery, and Small Versus Large Operative Working Spaces: A Preclinical Randomized Crossover Trial.

Authors:  Hani J Marcus; Carlo A Seneci; Archie Hughes-Hallett; Thomas P Cundy; Dipankar Nandi; Guang-Zhong Yang; Ara Darzi
Journal:  Surg Innov       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 2.058

10.  Ergonomic status of laparoscopic urologic surgery: survey results from 241 urologic surgeons in china.

Authors:  Boluo Liang; Lin Qi; Jinrui Yang; Zhenzhen Cao; Xiongbing Zu; Longfei Liu; Long Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.