Literature DB >> 18627227

Comparison of published recommendations regarding biosecurity practices for various production animal species and classes.

Dale A Moore1, Marcia L Merryman, Marla L Hartman, Donald J Klingborg.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare published recommendations regarding biosecurity practices for various production animal species and classes.
DESIGN: Literature review. POPULATION: Educational materials available on the World Wide Web that provided biosecurity recommendations for dairy cattle, beef cattle, small ruminant, swine, and poultry producers. PROCEDURES: Web sites for national producer organizations, university cooperative extension services, and state departments of agriculture were searched to identify educational materials with biosecurity recommendations.
RESULTS: A single national organization was selected as representing each animal agriculture commodity group. A total of 53 university Web sites were visited, and 65 publications prepared by university cooperative extension services were identified and evaluated. Web sites for all 50 state departments of agriculture were searched, and 29 were found to have at least 1 publication related to biosecurity practices, for a total of 46 publications. Evaluation of the biosecurity recommendations revealed wide variations by source and within and among commodity groups. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Results suggested that educational materials for producers contained wide variations in recommended biosecurity practices. It is possible that some producers choose not to implement biosecurity recommendations because of confusion as to the specific recommendations they should follow.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18627227     DOI: 10.2460/javma.233.2.249

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Vet Med Assoc        ISSN: 0003-1488            Impact factor:   1.936


  7 in total

1.  Assessment of biosecurity level in small-scale broiler farms in the Western highlands of Cameroon (Central Africa).

Authors:  Marc K Kouam; Manjeli Jacouba; Inouss N Nsangou; Alexis Teguia
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Biosecurity on cattle farms: a study in north-west England.

Authors:  Marnie L Brennan; Robert M Christley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Adoption of Secure Pork Supply Plan Biosecurity by U.S. Swine Producers.

Authors:  Christopher C Pudenz; Lee L Schulz; Glynn T Tonsor
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2019-05-28

4.  Cattle producers' perceptions of biosecurity.

Authors:  Marnie L Brennan; Robert M Christley
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 2.741

5.  Expert Opinion on the Perceived Effectiveness and Importance of On-Farm Biosecurity Measures for Cattle and Swine Farms in Switzerland.

Authors:  Karin Kuster; Marie-Eve Cousin; Thomas Jemmi; Gertraud Schüpbach-Regula; Ioannis Magouras
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Bioexclusion of diseases from dairy and beef farms: risks of introducing infectious agents and risk reduction strategies.

Authors:  John F Mee; Tim Geraghty; Ronan O'Neill; Simon J More
Journal:  Vet J       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 2.688

7.  Camelid herd health.

Authors:  Meredyth Jones; Melanie Boileau
Journal:  Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.357

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.