Literature DB >> 18626985

Transport characterization of hydrogel matrices for cell encapsulation.

R H Li1, D H Altreuter, F T Gentile.   

Abstract

Current membrane-based bioartificial organs consist of three basic components: (1) a synthetic membrane, (2) cells that secrete the product of interest, and (3) an encapsulated matrix material. Alginate and agarose have been widely used to encapsulate cells for artificial organ applications. It is important to understand the degree of transport resistance imparted by these matrices in cell encapsulation to determine if adequate nutrient and product fluxes can be obtained. For artificial organs in xenogeneic applications, it may also be important to determine the extent of immunoprotection offered by the matrix material. In this study, diffusion coefficients were measured for relevant solutes [ranging in size from oxygen to immunoglobulin G (IgG)] into and out of agarose and alginate gels. Alginate gels were produced by an extrusion/ionic crosslinking process using calcium while agarose gels were thermally gelled. The effect of varying crosslinking condition, polymer concentration, and direction of diffusion on transport was investigated. In general, 2-4% agarose gels offered little transport resistance for solutes up to 150 kD, while 1.5-3% alginate gels offered significant transport resistance for solutes in the molecular weight range 44-155 kD-lowering their diffusion rates from 10- to 100-fold as compared to their diffusion in water. Doubling the alginate concentration had a more significant effect on hindering diffusion of larger molecular weight species than did doubling the agarose concentration. Average pore diameters of approximately 170 and 147 A for 1.5 and 3% alginate gels, respectively, and 480 and 360 A for 2 and 4% agarose gels, respectively, were estimated using a semiempirical correlation based on diffusional transport of different-size solutes. The method developed for measuring diffusion in these gels is highly reproducible and useful for gels crosslinked in the cylindrical geometry, relevant for studying transport through matrices used in cell immobilization in the hollow fiber configuration. (c) 1996 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Entities:  

Year:  1996        PMID: 18626985     DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19960520)50:4<365::AID-BIT3>3.0.CO;2-J

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng        ISSN: 0006-3592            Impact factor:   4.530


  28 in total

Review 1.  Challenges and emerging technologies in the immunoisolation of cells and tissues.

Authors:  John T Wilson; Elliot L Chaikof
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2007-10-11       Impact factor: 15.470

2.  Engineering the follicle microenvironment.

Authors:  Erin R West; Lonnie D Shea; Teresa K Woodruff
Journal:  Semin Reprod Med       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.303

3.  Microfluidic production of single micrometer-sized hydrogel beads utilizing droplet dissolution in a polar solvent.

Authors:  Sari Sugaya; Masumi Yamada; Ayaka Hori; Minoru Seki
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 2.800

4.  Core-shell hydrogel beads with extracellular matrix for tumor spheroid formation.

Authors:  L Yu; S M Grist; S S Nasseri; E Cheng; Y-C E Hwang; C Ni; K C Cheung
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 2.800

5.  Controllable Soluble Protein Concentration Gradients in Hydrogel Networks.

Authors:  Brian J Peret; William L Murphy
Journal:  Adv Funct Mater       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 18.808

6.  Metre-long cell-laden microfibres exhibit tissue morphologies and functions.

Authors:  Hiroaki Onoe; Teru Okitsu; Akane Itou; Midori Kato-Negishi; Riho Gojo; Daisuke Kiriya; Koji Sato; Shigenori Miura; Shintaroh Iwanaga; Kaori Kuribayashi-Shigetomi; Yukiko T Matsunaga; Yuto Shimoyama; Shoji Takeuchi
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2013-03-31       Impact factor: 43.841

7.  Drug susceptibility of matrix-encapsulated Candida albicans nano-biofilms.

Authors:  Anand Srinivasan; Celia Macias Gupta; C Mauli Agrawal; Kai P Leung; Jose L Lopez-Ribot; Anand K Ramasubramanian
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 8.  Designing follicle-environment interactions with biomaterials.

Authors:  Rachel M Smith; Teresa K Woodruff; Lonnie D Shea
Journal:  Cancer Treat Res       Date:  2010

9.  Assaying How Phagocytic Success Depends on the Elasticity of a Large Target Structure.

Authors:  Megan Davis-Fields; Layla A Bakhtiari; Ziyang Lan; Kristin N Kovach; Liyun Wang; Elizabeth M Cosgriff-Hernandez; Vernita D Gordon
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  Thiol-ene-based biological/synthetic hybrid biomatrix for 3-D living cell culture.

Authors:  Kedi Xu; Yao Fu; WeiJu Chung; Xiaoxiang Zheng; Yujia Cui; Ian C Hsu; Weiyuan John Kao
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 8.947

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.