Literature DB >> 31586520

Assaying How Phagocytic Success Depends on the Elasticity of a Large Target Structure.

Megan Davis-Fields1, Layla A Bakhtiari2, Ziyang Lan3, Kristin N Kovach2, Liyun Wang2, Elizabeth M Cosgriff-Hernandez3, Vernita D Gordon4.   

Abstract

Biofilm infections can consist of bacterial aggregates that are an order of magnitude larger than neutrophils, phagocytic immune cells that densely surround aggregates but do not enter them. Because a neutrophil is too small to engulf the entire aggregate, it must be able to detach and engulf a few bacteria at a time if it is to use phagocytosis to clear the infection. Current research techniques do not provide a method for determining how the success of phagocytosis, here defined as the complete engulfment of a piece of foreign material, depends on the mechanical properties of a larger object from which the piece must be removed before being engulfed. This article presents a step toward such a method. By varying polymer concentration or cross-linking density, the elastic moduli of centimeter-sized gels are varied over the range that was previously measured for Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms grown from clinical bacterial isolates. Human neutrophils are isolated from blood freshly drawn from healthy adult volunteers, exposed to gel containing embedded beads for 1 h, and removed from the gel. The percentage of collected neutrophils that contain beads that had previously been within the gels is used to measure successful phagocytic engulfment. Both increased polymer concentration in agarose gels and increased cross-linking density in alginate gels are associated with a decreased success of phagocytic engulfment. Upon plotting the percentage of neutrophils showing successful engulfment as a function of the elastic modulus of the gel to which they were applied, it is found that data from both alginate and agarose gels collapse onto the same curve. This suggests that gel mechanics may be impacting the success of phagocytosis and demonstrates that this experiment is a step toward realizing methods for measuring how the mechanics of a large target, or a large structure in which smaller targets are embedded, impact the success of phagocytic engulfment.
Copyright © 2019 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31586520      PMCID: PMC6817645          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2019.08.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  66 in total

1.  Diffusion of macromolecules in agarose gels: comparison of linear and globular configurations.

Authors:  A Pluen; P A Netti; R K Jain; D A Berk
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Biofilm material properties as related to shear-induced deformation and detachment phenomena.

Authors:  P Stoodley; R Cargo; C J Rupp; S Wilson; I Klapper
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.346

Review 3.  Impact of particle elasticity on particle-based drug delivery systems.

Authors:  Aaron C Anselmo; Samir Mitragotri
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 15.470

4.  Modulus-dependent macrophage adhesion and behavior.

Authors:  E F Irwin; K Saha; M Rosenbluth; L J Gamble; D G Castner; K E Healy
Journal:  J Biomater Sci Polym Ed       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.517

5.  Neutrophils Kill Antibody-Opsonized Cancer Cells by Trogoptosis.

Authors:  Hanke L Matlung; Liane Babes; Xi Wen Zhao; Michel van Houdt; Louise W Treffers; Dieke J van Rees; Katka Franke; Karin Schornagel; Paul Verkuijlen; Hans Janssen; Pasi Halonen; Cor Lieftink; Roderick L Beijersbergen; Jeanette H W Leusen; Jaap J Boelens; Ingrid Kuhnle; Jutte van der Werff Ten Bosch; Karl Seeger; Sergio Rutella; Daria Pagliara; Takashi Matozaki; Eiji Suzuki; Catharina Willemien Menke-van der Houven van Oordt; Robin van Bruggen; Dirk Roos; Rene A W van Lier; Taco W Kuijpers; Paul Kubes; Timo K van den Berg
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 9.423

6.  Alginate overproduction affects Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm structure and function.

Authors:  M Hentzer; G M Teitzel; G J Balzer; A Heydorn; S Molin; M Givskov; M R Parsek
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 7.  Oxidative stress and antioxidant therapy in cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Francesco Galli; Andrea Battistoni; Roberto Gambari; Alfonso Pompella; Alessandra Bragonzi; Francesca Pilolli; Luigi Iuliano; Marta Piroddi; Maria Cristina Dechecchi; Giulio Cabrini
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2011-12-28

8.  Distribution, organization, and ecology of bacteria in chronic wounds.

Authors:  Klaus Kirketerp-Møller; Peter Ø Jensen; Mustafa Fazli; Kit G Madsen; Jette Pedersen; Claus Moser; Tim Tolker-Nielsen; Niels Høiby; Michael Givskov; Thomas Bjarnsholt
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm matrix polysaccharide Psl is regulated transcriptionally by RpoS and post-transcriptionally by RsmA.

Authors:  Yasuhiko Irie; Melissa Starkey; Adrianne N Edwards; Daniel J Wozniak; Tony Romeo; Matthew R Parsek
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2010-08-02       Impact factor: 3.501

10.  Biosynthesis of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa Extracellular Polysaccharides, Alginate, Pel, and Psl.

Authors:  Michael J Franklin; David E Nivens; Joel T Weadge; P Lynne Howell
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 5.640

View more
  2 in total

1.  High-throughput assays show the timescale for phagocytic success depends on the target toughness.

Authors:  Layla A Bakhtiari; Marilyn J Wells; Vernita D Gordon
Journal:  Biophys Rev (Melville)       Date:  2021-09-30

2.  Automated quantification of Candida albicans biofilm-related phenotypes reveals additive contributions to biofilm production.

Authors:  Matthew J Dunn; Robert J Fillinger; Leah M Anderson; Matthew Z Anderson
Journal:  NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 7.290

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.