Literature DB >> 18626789

Fresh cortical autograft versus fresh cortical allograft effects on experimental bone healing in rabbits: radiological, histopathological and biomechanical evaluation.

Z Shafiei1, A S Bigham, S N Dehghani, S Torabi Nezhad.   

Abstract

Bone grafting is used to enhance healing in osteotomies, arthrodesis, and multifragmentary fractures and to replace bony loss resulting from neoplasia or cysts. They are source of osteoprogenitor cells and induce bone formation and provide mechanical support for vascular and bone ingrowth. Autografts are used commonly but quantity of harvested bone is limit. This study was designed to evaluate fresh cortical autograft and allograft effects on bone healing process. Twenty male White New Zealand rabbits were used in this study. In autograft group the defect was filled by fresh autogenous cortical graft, in allograft group the defect was filled by a segment of fresh allogenous cortical bone which was harvested at the time of surgery during the creation of radius bone defect. Then all surface soft tissue, such as muscle attachments, were removed from the harvested bone and changed between rabbits as a fresh allogenous cortical bone graft and was fixed by cercelage wire. Radiological, histopathological and biomechanical evaluations were performed blindly and results scored and analyzed statistically. Statistical tests did not support significant differences between two groups at the 14th and 56th postoperative day radiographically (P > 0.05). There was a significant difference radiologically for the 28th and the 42nd postoperative (P < 0.05). Autograft was superior to allograft at the 28th and 42nd postoperative day in radiological evaluation (P < 0.03). Histopathological and biomechanical evaluation revealed no significant differences between two groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18626789     DOI: 10.1007/s10561-008-9105-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Tissue Bank        ISSN: 1389-9333            Impact factor:   1.522


  15 in total

1.  In vivo performance of bilayer hydroxyapatite scaffolds for bone tissue regeneration in the rabbit radius.

Authors:  Teja Guda; John A Walker; Beth E Pollot; Mark R Appleford; Sunho Oh; Joo L Ong; Joseph C Wenke
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Alternatives to autograft evaluated in a rabbit segmental bone defect.

Authors:  Jennifer S McDaniel; Marcello Pilia; Vivek Raut; Jeffrey Ledford; Stefanie M Shiels; Joseph C Wenke; Brian Barnes; Christopher R Rathbone
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  Basic concepts regarding fracture healing and the current options and future directions in managing bone fractures.

Authors:  Amin Bigham-Sadegh; Ahmad Oryan
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 3.315

4.  Evaluation of safety and efficacy of radiation-sterilized bone allografts in reconstructive oral surgery.

Authors:  Marta Krasny; Kornel Krasny; Artur Kamiński; Małgorzata Zadurska; Piotr Piekarczyk; Piotr Fiedor
Journal:  Cell Tissue Bank       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 1.522

5.  Synthesis of and in vitro and in vivo evaluation of a novel TGF-β1-SF-CS three-dimensional scaffold for bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Shuang Tong; Da-Peng Xu; Zi-Mei Liu; Yang Du; Xu-Kai Wang
Journal:  Int J Mol Med       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 4.101

6.  Repair of segmental radial defect with autologous bone marrow aspirate and hydroxyapatite in rabbit radius: A clinical and radiographic evaluation.

Authors:  Kalbaza Ahmed Yassine; Benchohra Mokhtar; Hemida Houari; Amara Karim; Melizi Mohamed
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2017-07-07

7.  Reconstruction of large bone defect using autogenous fibular strut and iliac bone graft for revision total elbow arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yoon Min Lee; Soo Hun Son; Yoo Joon Sur; Seok Whan Song
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 8.  Current progress in bioactive ceramic scaffolds for bone repair and regeneration.

Authors:  Chengde Gao; Youwen Deng; Pei Feng; Zhongzheng Mao; Pengjian Li; Bo Yang; Junjie Deng; Yiyuan Cao; Cijun Shuai; Shuping Peng
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 9.  Bone regenerative medicine: classic options, novel strategies, and future directions.

Authors:  Ahmad Oryan; Soodeh Alidadi; Ali Moshiri; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 2.359

10.  AMP-activated protein kinase stimulates osteoblast differentiation and mineralization through autophagy induction.

Authors:  Yi Li; Jiajia Su; Wenchao Sun; Lin Cai; Zhouming Deng
Journal:  Int J Mol Med       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 4.101

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.