Literature DB >> 18626667

Development and validation of the system of quality of life instruments for cancer patients: breast cancer (QLICP-BR).

Chonghua Wan1, Zheng Yang, Xueliang Tang, Tianning Zou, Dedian Chen, Dongmei Zhang, Qiong Meng.   

Abstract

GOALS: To develop and validate a quality of life (QOL) instrument for patients with breast cancer, QLICP-BR, which is one of the system of QOL instruments for cancer patients in China.
METHODS: Using the programmed decision methods of instrument development, the quality of life instrument for cancer patients-breast cancer (QLICP-BR) with considering Chinese cultural background was developed, and evaluated on the data from 186 inpatients with breast cancer. The statistical methods used in this research included statistical description, Pearson correlation, factor analysis, and paired t test.
RESULTS: The test-retest reliability for the overall scale and five domains are all above 0.75. Internal consistency alpha for each domain is higher than 0.65 except social domain (0.58). Most correlation coefficients between each item and it's domain are above 0.60. The scores differences between pretreatment and post-treatment for overall scale, general module, physical domain, psychological domain and social domain have statistical significance.
CONCLUSIONS: The QLICP-BR is of good validity, reliability, and reasonable responsiveness, and can be used to assess quality of life for patients with breast cancer in China.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18626667     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-008-0478-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  19 in total

Review 1.  Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations.

Authors:  J A Husted; R J Cook; V T Farewell; D D Gladman
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  On assessing responsiveness of health-related quality of life instruments: guidelines for instrument evaluation.

Authors:  C B Terwee; F W Dekker; W M Wiersinga; M F Prummel; P M M Bossuyt
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Psychometric properties of the simplified Chinese version of the EORTC QLQ-BR53 for measuring quality of life for breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Chonghua Wan; Xueliang Tang; Xin M Tu; Changyong Feng; Susan Messing; Qiong Meng; Xiaoqing Zhang
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2007-01-13       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  [Development of the general module of the system of quality of life instruments for cancer patients: responsiveness analysis].

Authors:  Chong-Hua Wan; Jia-Hong Luo; Zheng Yang; Qiong Meng; Xiao-Qing Zhang; Yu-Bo Lu; Xue-Liang Tang; Can-Zhen Zhang
Journal:  Ai Zheng       Date:  2007-04

5.  [Development of the general module of the system of quality of life instruments for cancer patients: item selection and structure of the general module].

Authors:  Chong-Hua Wan; Qiong Meng; Jia-Hong Luo; Xue-Liang Tang; Can-Zhen Zhang; Yu-Bo Lu; Zheng Yang; Xiao-Qing Zhang
Journal:  Ai Zheng       Date:  2007-02

6.  The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer breast cancer-specific quality-of-life questionnaire module: first results from a three-country field study.

Authors:  M A Sprangers; M Groenvold; J I Arraras; J Franklin; A te Velde; M Muller; L Franzini; A Williams; H C de Haes; P Hopwood; A Cull; N K Aaronson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  The MOS short-form general health survey. Reliability and validity in a patient population.

Authors:  A L Stewart; R D Hays; J E Ware
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  The Nottingham Health Profile: subjective health status and medical consultations.

Authors:  S M Hunt; S P McKenna; J McEwen; J Williams; E Papp
Journal:  Soc Sci Med A       Date:  1981-05

9.  Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast quality-of-life instrument.

Authors:  M J Brady; D F Cella; F Mo; A E Bonomi; D S Tulsky; S R Lloyd; S Deasy; M Cobleigh; G Shiomoto
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  The development of a method for assessing the quality of life of cancer patients.

Authors:  P J Selby; J A Chapman; J Etazadi-Amoli; D Dalley; N F Boyd
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation of cross-cultural adaptation and measurement properties of breast cancer-specific quality-of-life questionnaires: a systematic review.

Authors:  Indiara Soares Oliveira; Lucíola da Cunha Menezes Costa; Felipe Ribeiro Cabral Fagundes; Cristina Maria Nunes Cabral
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Development and validation of the nasopharyngeal cancer scale among the system of quality of life instruments for cancer patients (QLICP-NA V2.0): combined classical test theory and generalizability theory.

Authors:  Jiayuan Wu; Liren Hu; Gaohua Zhang; Qilian Liang; Qiong Meng; Chonghua Wan
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Development and validation of the simplified Chinese version of EORTC QLQ-H&N35 for patients with head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Zheng Yang; Qiong Meng; Jiahong Luo; Qian Lu; Xiaojiang Li; Gaofeng Li; Chonghua Wan
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Development and Validation of the Breast Cancer Scale QLICP-BR V2.0 Based on Classical Test Theory and Generalizability Theory.

Authors:  Fei Li; Jiali Zhou; Chonghua Wan; Zheng Yang; Qilian Liang; Weiqiang Li; Huanwei Chen
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 5.738

5.  Establishing Minimal Clinically Important Differences for the Quality of Life Instrument in Patients With Breast Cancer QLICP-BR (V2.0) Based on Anchor-Based and Distribution-Based Methods.

Authors:  Fei Li; Yuxi Liu; Chonghua Wan; Jiali Zhou; Jianfeng Tan; Huanwei Chen
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 5.738

6.  Assessing health-related quality of life in patients with breast cancer: a systematic and standardized comparison of available instruments using the EMPRO tool.

Authors:  Stefano Maratia; Sergio Cedillo; Javier Rejas
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Validation of Quality of Life Instruments for Cancer Patients - Colorectal Cancer (QLICP-CR) in patients with colorectal cancer in Northeast China.

Authors:  Min Liu; Wei Sun; Yuan-Yi Cai; Hua-Zhang Wu
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Health-related quality of life in women with breast cancer: a review of measures.

Authors:  Maribel Salas; Margaret Mordin; Colleen Castro; Zahidul Islam; Nora Tu; Michelle D Hackshaw
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-01-15       Impact factor: 4.430

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.