Literature DB >> 18626007

Role of KRAS and EGFR as biomarkers of response to erlotinib in National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group Study BR.21.

Chang-Qi Zhu1, Gilda da Cunha Santos, Keyue Ding, Akira Sakurada, Jean-Claude Cutz, Ni Liu, Tong Zhang, Paula Marrano, Marlo Whitehead, Jeremy A Squire, Suzanne Kamel-Reid, Lesley Seymour, Frances A Shepherd, Ming-Sound Tsao.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of KRAS and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) genotype on the response to erlotinib treatment in the BR.21, placebo-controlled trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed 206 tumors for KRAS mutation, 204 tumors for EGFR mutation, and 159 tumors for EGFR gene copy by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). We reanalyzed EGFR deletion/mutation using two highly sensitive techniques that detect abnormalities in samples with 5% to 10% tumor cellularity. KRAS mutation was analyzed by direct sequencing.
RESULTS: Thirty patients (15%) had KRAS mutations, 34 (17%) had EGFR exon 19 deletion or exon 21 L858R mutations, and 61 (38%) had high EGFR gene copy (FISH positive). Response rates were 10% for wild-type and 5% for mutant KRAS (P = .69), 7% for wild-type and 27% for mutant EGFR (P = .03), and 5% for EGFR FISH-negative and 21% for FISH-positive patients (P = .02). Significant survival benefit from erlotinib therapy was observed for patients with wild-type KRAS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.69, P = .03) and EGFR FISH positivity (HR = 0.43, P = .004) but not for patients with mutant KRAS (HR = 1.67, P = .31), wild-type EGFR (HR = 0.74, P = .09), mutant EGFR (HR = 0.55, P = .12), and EGFR FISH negativity (HR = 0.80, P = .35). In multivariate analysis, only EGFR FISH-positive status was prognostic for poorer survival (P = .025) and predictive of differential survival benefit from erlotinib (P = .005).
CONCLUSION: EGFR mutations and high copy number are predictive of response to erlotinib. EGFR FISH is the strongest prognostic marker and a significant predictive marker of differential survival benefit from erlotinib.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18626007     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.8924

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  233 in total

1.  Report of a multicenter phase II trial testing a combination of biweekly bevacizumab and daily erlotinib in patients with unresectable biliary cancer: a phase II Consortium study.

Authors:  Sam J Lubner; Michelle R Mahoney; Jill L Kolesar; Noelle K Loconte; George P Kim; Henry C Pitot; Philip A Philip; Joel Picus; Wei-Peng Yong; Lisa Horvath; Guy Van Hazel; Charles E Erlichman; Kyle D Holen
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Integrating molecular diagnostics into anticancer drug discovery.

Authors:  István Peták; Richárd Schwab; László Orfi; László Kopper; György Kéri
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 3.  Targeted therapy in non-small-cell lung cancer--is it becoming a reality?

Authors:  Filip Janku; David J Stewart; Razelle Kurzrock
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 66.675

4.  The escalating role of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors in cancer management: clinical considerations for the health system pharmacist.

Authors:  Dwight D Kloth; Lew Iacovelli; Rebecca Arbuckle; Angela C McIntosh
Journal:  P T       Date:  2010-04

Review 5.  Molecular testing in lung cancer: the time is now.

Authors:  Haiying Cheng; Xunhai Xu; Daniel B Costa; Charles A Powell; Balazs Halmos
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 5.075

6.  Comparison of the Amplification Refractory Mutation System, Super Amplification Refractory Mutation System, and Droplet Digital PCR for T790 M Mutation Detection in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer after Failure of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Treatment.

Authors:  Lucheng Zhu; Shirong Zhang; Yanping Xun; Yanping Jiang; Bing Xia; Xueqin Chen; Limin Wang; Hong Jiang; Shenglin Ma
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2017-09-03       Impact factor: 3.201

7.  Erlotinib therapy after initial platinum doublet therapy in patients with EGFR wild type non-small cell lung cancer: results of a combined patient-level analysis of the NCIC CTG BR.21 and SATURN trials.

Authors:  Raymond U Osarogiagbon; Federico Cappuzzo; Tudor Ciuleanu; Larry Leon; Barbara Klughammer
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2015-08

Review 8.  Mechanisms of tumor resistance to EGFR-targeted therapies.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Hopper-Borge; Rochelle E Nasto; Vladimir Ratushny; Louis M Weiner; Erica A Golemis; Igor Astsaturov
Journal:  Expert Opin Ther Targets       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 6.902

9.  An epithelial-mesenchymal transition gene signature predicts resistance to EGFR and PI3K inhibitors and identifies Axl as a therapeutic target for overcoming EGFR inhibitor resistance.

Authors:  Lauren Averett Byers; Lixia Diao; Jing Wang; Pierre Saintigny; Luc Girard; Michael Peyton; Li Shen; Youhong Fan; Uma Giri; Praveen K Tumula; Monique B Nilsson; Jayanthi Gudikote; Hai Tran; Robert J G Cardnell; David J Bearss; Steven L Warner; Jason M Foulks; Steven B Kanner; Varsha Gandhi; Nancy Krett; Steven T Rosen; Edward S Kim; Roy S Herbst; George R Blumenschein; J Jack Lee; Scott M Lippman; K Kian Ang; Gordon B Mills; Waun K Hong; John N Weinstein; Ignacio I Wistuba; Kevin R Coombes; John D Minna; John V Heymach
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  Clinical validation of coexisting driver mutations in colorectal cancers.

Authors:  Gang Zheng; Li-Hui Tseng; Lisa Haley; Junaid Ibrahim; Jennifer Bynum; Rena Xian; Christopher D Gocke; James R Eshleman; Ming-Tseh Lin
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2018-11-24       Impact factor: 3.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.