Literature DB >> 18624883

Sperm competition within a dominance hierarchy: investment in social status vs. investment in ejaculates.

V Tamara Montrose1, W Edwin Harris, A J Moore, P J Moore.   

Abstract

There is increasing recognition that male-male competition can take many forms, but as yet the form is not predictable a priori. Many recent studies have focused attention on how males in disadvantaged mating roles compensate through sperm competition. However, mating systems in which subordinate males are reproductively suppressed, particularly through the stress of social interactions, may limit the ability of males to respond by increasing investment in sperm quality. We examined the interaction between social status and ejaculate tactics in Nauphoeta cinerea, a cockroach that has a mating system with well-characterized dominance hierarchies. Both social experience with other males and social status influenced aspects of ejaculates. The stress of social interactions reduced the size of the ejaculate and number of sperm inseminated. In ejaculates formed prior to social experience, however, males that go on to become dominant inseminated more sperm than males that go on to become subordinate, suggesting innate differences among males. Our results show that though selection for increased success in sperm competition for subordinate males in a hierarchy can occur, both the traits and the way in which the balance between pre- and post-copulatory strategies is negotiated will depend on specific details of the mating system. These details will include how the physiological effects of social interactions may limit selection through male-male competition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18624883     DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2008.01570.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Evol Biol        ISSN: 1010-061X            Impact factor:   2.411


  9 in total

Review 1.  It's all in your head: the role of quantity estimation in sperm competition.

Authors:  Eran M Shifferman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Subordinate male cichlids retain reproductive competence during social suppression.

Authors:  Jacqueline M Kustan; Karen P Maruska; Russell D Fernald
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Protein and carbohydrate intake influence sperm number and fertility in male cockroaches, but not sperm viability.

Authors:  Harriet Bunning; James Rapkin; Laurence Belcher; C Ruth Archer; Kim Jensen; John Hunt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Low pitched voices are perceived as masculine and attractive but do they predict semen quality in men?

Authors:  Leigh W Simmons; Marianne Peters; Gillian Rhodes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Comparative morphological trade-offs between pre- and post-copulatory sexual selection in Giant hissing cockroaches (Tribe: Gromphadorhini).

Authors:  Kate L Durrant; Ian M Skicko; Craig Sturrock; Sophie L Mowles
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  A study of the transit amplification divisions during spermatogenesis in Oncopetus fasciatus to assess plasticity in sperm numbers or sperm viability under different diets.

Authors:  Ashley E Duxbury; Brandie Weathersby; Zachary Sanchez; Patricia J Moore
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Male-male behavioral interactions drive social-dominance-mediated differences in ejaculate traits.

Authors:  Charel Reuland; Brett M Culbert; Erika Fernlund Isaksson; Ariel F Kahrl; Alessandro Devigili; John L Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2020-11-28       Impact factor: 2.671

8.  Sperm: seminal fluid interactions and the adjustment of sperm quality in relation to female attractiveness.

Authors:  Charlie K Cornwallis; Emily A O'Connor
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 9.  Polyandry as a mediator of sexual selection before and after mating.

Authors:  Charlotta Kvarnemo; Leigh W Simmons
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 6.237

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.