Literature DB >> 1862401

Disc degeneration in magnetic resonance imaging. A comparative biochemical, histologic, and radiologic study in cadaver spines.

M Tertti1, H Paajanen, M Laato, H Aho, M Komu, M Kormano.   

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of 89 autopsied intervertebral discs from 22 cadaveric lumbar spines were correlated with biochemical composition, conventional radiography, and histologic structure to study the nature of disc intensity changes seen in MRI. Discs with a low signal intensity on T2-weighted MRI were characterized by shortening of relaxation times, dehydration, and decreases in total proteoglycan content and chondroitin-keratan sulfate ratios in the nucleus pulposus. This corresponded well with previously published studies. In histologic structure, no obvious differences between MRI findings were found. In conclusion, a low signal intensity in a lumbar disc on T2-weighted MRI probably reflects a true biochemical disc degeneration, but its relation to structural degenerative changes is uncertain. Therefore, MRI seems to be a sensitive and a specific imaging modality for detecting pathologic biochemical disc changes in the spine of a young adult.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1862401     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199106000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  51 in total

1.  Lumbar intervertebral disc abnormalities: comparison of quantitative T2 mapping with conventional MR at 3.0 T.

Authors:  Siegfried Trattnig; David Stelzeneder; Sabine Goed; Michael Reissegger; Tallal C Mamisch; Tatjana Paternostro-Sluga; Michael Weber; Pavol Szomolanyi; Goetz H Welsch
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-06-19       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  [Biochemical magnetic resonance imaging of intervertebral discs and facet joints].

Authors:  D Stelzeneder; S Trattnig
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  Spontaneous resolution of lumbar disk herniation: predictive signs for prognostic evaluation.

Authors:  Alessandra Splendiani; Edoardo Puglielli; Rosanna De Amicis; Antonio Barile; Carlo Masciocchi; Massimo Gallucci
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2004-11-11       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 4.  Review of existing grading systems for cervical or lumbar disc and facet joint degeneration.

Authors:  Annette Kettler; Hans-Joachim Wilke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-09-20       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Degeneration of the cervical disc: histology compared with radiography and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  A Christe; R Läubli; R Guzman; U Berlemann; R J Moore; G Schroth; P Vock; K O Lövblad
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2005-09-01       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  Evaluation of quantitative magnetic resonance imaging, biochemical and mechanical properties of trypsin-treated intervertebral discs under physiological compression loading.

Authors:  Fackson Mwale; Caroline N Demers; Arthur J Michalek; Gilles Beaudoin; Tapas Goswami; Lorne Beckman; James C Iatridis; John Antoniou
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Intervertebral disc lesions: visualisation with ultra-high field MRI at 11.7 T.

Authors:  Nikolaus Berger-Roscher; Fabio Galbusera; Volker Rasche; Hans-Joachim Wilke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  A statistical model for intervertebral disc degeneration: determination of the optimal T2 cut-off values.

Authors:  S A Nagy; I Juhasz; H Komaromy; K Pozsar; I Zsigmond; G Perlaki; G Orsi; A Schwarcz; N Walter; T Doczi; P Bogner
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 3.649

9.  Disc degeneration of pediatric patients in lumbar MRI.

Authors:  S Salo; H Paajanen; A Alanen
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  1995

10.  Diagnostic relevance of pressure-controlled discography.

Authors:  Dong-Ah Shin; Hyoung-Ihl Kim; Jae-Hyun Jung; Dong-Gyu Shin; Jung-Ok Lee
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.153

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.