Literature DB >> 18620025

Unconditioned stimulus pathways to the amygdala: effects of lesions of the posterior intralaminar thalamus on foot-shock-induced c-Fos expression in the subdivisions of the lateral amygdala.

E Lanuza1, J Moncho-Bogani, J E Ledoux.   

Abstract

The lateral nucleus of the amygdala (LA) is a site of convergence for auditory (conditioned stimulus) and foot-shock (unconditioned stimulus) inputs during fear conditioning. The auditory pathways to LA are well characterized, but less is known about the pathways through which foot shock is transmitted. Anatomical tracing and physiological recording studies suggest that the posterior intralaminar thalamic nucleus, which projects to LA, receives both auditory and somatosensory inputs. In the present study we examined the expression of the immediate-early gene c-fos in the LA in rats in response to foot-shock stimulation. We then determined the effects of posterior intralaminar thalamic lesions on foot-shock-induced c-Fos expression in the LA. Foot-shock stimulation led to an increase in the density of c-Fos-positive cells in all LA subnuclei in comparison to controls exposed to the conditioning box but not shocked. However, some differences among the dorsolateral, ventrolateral and ventromedial subnuclei were observed. The ventrolateral subnucleus showed a homogeneous activation throughout its antero-posterior extension. In contrast, only the rostral aspect of the ventromedial subnucleus and the central aspect of the dorsolateral subnucleus showed a significant increment in c-Fos expression. The density of c-Fos-labeled cells in all LA subnuclei was also increased in animals placed in the box in comparison to untreated animals. Unilateral electrolytic lesions of the posterior intralaminar thalamic nucleus and the medial division of the medial geniculate body reduced foot-shock-induced c-Fos activation in the LA ipsilateral to the lesion. The number of c-Fos labeled cells on the lesioned side was reduced to the levels observed in the animals exposed only to the box. These results indicate that the LA is involved in processing information about the foot-shock unconditioned stimulus and receives this kind of somatosensory information from the posterior intralaminar thalamic nucleus and the medial division of the medial geniculate body.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18620025      PMCID: PMC2587439          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.06.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  53 in total

Review 1.  Emotion circuits in the brain.

Authors:  J E LeDoux
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 12.449

2.  Patterns of Fos expression in the amygdala and ventral perirhinal cortex induced by training in an olfactory fear conditioning paradigm.

Authors:  L F Schettino; T Otto
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.912

3.  Unconditioned stimulus pathways to the amygdala: effects of posterior thalamic and cortical lesions on fear conditioning.

Authors:  E Lanuza; K Nader; J E Ledoux
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.590

4.  Efferent connections of the parabrachial nucleus in the rat.

Authors:  C B Saper; A D Loewy
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1980-09-22       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Afferent connections to the amygdaloid complex of the rat and cat. I. Projections from the thalamus.

Authors:  O P Ottersen; Y Ben-Ari
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1979-09-15       Impact factor: 3.215

6.  Calcitonin gene-related peptide immunoreactivity in the visceral sensory cortex, thalamus, and related pathways in the rat.

Authors:  Y Yasui; C B Saper; D F Cechetto
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1989-12-22       Impact factor: 3.215

7.  Specific induction of early growth response gene 1 in the lateral nucleus of the amygdala following contextual fear conditioning in rats.

Authors:  S Malkani; J B Rosen
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 8.  Synaptic plasticity in the lateral amygdala: a cellular hypothesis of fear conditioning.

Authors:  H T Blair; G E Schafe; E P Bauer; S M Rodrigues; J E LeDoux
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.460

9.  Amygdala c-Fos induction corresponds to unconditioned and conditioned aversive stimuli but not to freezing.

Authors:  Matthew R Holahan; Norman M White
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2004-06-04       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  The role of the dorsal hippocampus in the acquisition and retrieval of context memory representations.

Authors:  Patricia Matus-Amat; Emily A Higgins; Ruth M Barrientos; Jerry W Rudy
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-03-10       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  22 in total

Review 1.  Controlling the elements: an optogenetic approach to understanding the neural circuits of fear.

Authors:  Joshua P Johansen; Steffen B E Wolff; Andreas Lüthi; Joseph E LeDoux
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 13.382

Review 2.  Neural and cellular mechanisms of fear and extinction memory formation.

Authors:  Caitlin A Orsini; Stephen Maren
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2012-01-02       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 3.  The amygdala and medial prefrontal cortex: partners in the fear circuit.

Authors:  Roger Marek; Cornelia Strobel; Timothy W Bredy; Pankaj Sah
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Painful laser stimuli induce directed functional interactions within and between the human amygdala and hippocampus.

Authors:  C C Liu; C-Q Shi; P J Franaszczuk; N E Crone; D Schretlen; S Ohara; F A Lenz
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 3.590

5.  The medial geniculate, not the amygdala, as the root of auditory fear conditioning.

Authors:  Norman M Weinberger
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Ramelteon Improves Post-traumatic Stress Disorder-Like Behaviors Exhibited by Fatty Acid-Binding Protein 3 Null Mice.

Authors:  Yasushi Yabuki; Ibuki Takahata; Kazuya Matsuo; Yuji Owada; Kohji Fukunaga
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 5.590

7.  Associative and plastic thalamic signaling to the lateral amygdala controls fear behavior.

Authors:  Boglárka Barsy; Kinga Kocsis; Aletta Magyar; Ákos Babiczky; Mónika Szabó; Judit M Veres; Dániel Hillier; István Ulbert; Ofer Yizhar; Ferenc Mátyás
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 24.884

8.  Painful stimuli evoke potentials recorded from the medial temporal lobe in humans.

Authors:  C C Liu; S Ohara; P Franaszczuk; N Zagzoog; M Gallagher; F A Lenz
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 3.590

9.  Functional emergence of the hippocampus in context fear learning in infant rats.

Authors:  Charlis Raineki; Parker J Holman; Jacek Debiec; Melissa Bugg; Allyson Beasley; Regina M Sullivan
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.899

10.  Evaluation of medial division of the medial geniculate (MGM) and posterior intralaminar nucleus (PIN) inputs to the rat auditory cortex, amygdala, and striatum.

Authors:  Philip H Smith; Daniel J Uhlrich; Karen A Manning
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 3.215

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.