Literature DB >> 18619754

Region of interest and pixel-by-pixel analysis of dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging parameters and time-intensity curve shapes: a comparison in chondroid tumors.

Cristina Lavini1, Branko P Pikaart, Milko C de Jonge, Gerard R Schaap, Mario Maas.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI is widely acknowledged to be a helpful tool in the diagnosis and differentiation of tumors. In common clinical settings, the dynamic changes described by the time-intensity curves (TICs) are evaluated to find patterns of atypical tissue behavior, i.e., areas characterized by rapid contrast wash-in and wash-out. Despite the ease of this approach, there is no consensus about the specificity of the TIC shapes in discriminating tumor grades. We explore a new way of looking at TICs, where these are not averaged over a selected region of interest (ROI), but rendered pixel-by-pixel. In this way, the characteristic of the tissue is not given as a single TIC classification but as a distribution of the different TIC patterns. We applied this method in a group of patients with chondroid tumors and compared its outcome with the outcome of the standard ROI-based averaged TIC analysis. Furthermore, we focused on the problem of ROI selection in these tumors and how this affects the outcome of the TIC analysis. Finally, we investigated what relationship exists between the "standard" DCE-MRI parameter maximum enhancement (ME) and the TIC shape.
CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that, where the ROI approach fails to show the presence of areas of rapid contrast wash-in and wash-out, the pixel-by-pixel approach reveals the coexistence of a heterogeneous pattern of TIC shapes. Secondly, we point out the differences in the DCE MRI parameters and tumor volume that can result when selecting the tumor based on DCE parameter maps or post-contrast T1-weighted images. Finally, we show that ME maps and TIC shape maps highlight different tissue areas and, therefore, the use of the ME maps is not appropriate for the correct identification of areas of atypical TICs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18619754     DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2008.05.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0730-725X            Impact factor:   2.546


  9 in total

1.  Quantitative evaluation of the tibial tunnel after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using diffusion weighted and dynamic contrast enhanced MRI: a follow-up feasibility study.

Authors:  Mitja Rupreht; Vladimir Jevtič; Igor Serša; Matjaž Vogrin; Tomaž Seruga; Marko Jevšek
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Comparison of region-of-interest-averaged and pixel-averaged analysis of DCE-MRI data based on simulations and pre-clinical experiments.

Authors:  Dianning He; Marta Zamora; Aytekin Oto; Gregory S Karczmar; Xiaobing Fan
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Automatic ROI construction for analyzing time-signal intensity curve in dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast.

Authors:  Koya Fujimoto; Yasuyuki Ueda; Shohei Kudomi; Teppei Yonezawa; Yuki Fujimoto; Katsuhiko Ueda
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2015-07-04

Review 4.  New insights into the evaluation of peripheral nerves lesions: a survival guide for beginners.

Authors:  Teodoro Martín-Noguerol; Rafael Barousse; Antonio Luna; Mariano Socolovsky; Juan M Górriz; Manuel Gómez-Río
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  Preliminary experience using dynamic MRI at 3.0 Tesla for evaluation of soft tissue tumors.

Authors:  Michael Yong Park; Won-Hee Jee; Sun Ki Kim; So-Yeon Lee; Joon-Yong Jung
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 6.  Musculoskeletal tumors: how to use anatomic, functional, and metabolic MR techniques.

Authors:  Laura M Fayad; Michael A Jacobs; Xin Wang; John A Carrino; David A Bluemke
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Imaging findings in craniofacial childhood rhabdomyosarcoma.

Authors:  Nicole J M Freling; Johannes H M Merks; Peerooz Saeed; Alfons J M Balm; Johannes Bras; Bradley R Pieters; Judit A Adam; Rick R van Rijn
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2010-08-20

8.  Semi-quantitative parameter analysis of DCE-MRI revisited: monte-carlo simulation, clinical comparisons, and clinical validation of measurement errors in patients with type 2 neurofibromatosis.

Authors:  Alan Jackson; Ka-Loh Li; Xiaoping Zhu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Clinical applications of advanced magnetic resonance imaging techniques for arthritis evaluation.

Authors:  Teodoro Martín Noguerol; Antonio Luna; Marta Gómez Cabrera; Alexie D Riofrio
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2017-09-18
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.