Literature DB >> 18618409

Odorant-receptor interactions and odor percept: a chemical perspective.

Annika Triller1, Elizabeth A Boulden, Anne Churchill, Hanns Hatt, Joakim Englund, Marc Spehr, Charles S Sell.   

Abstract

Receptor-ligand interaction models are generally based on a 'lock and key' concept. How far this holds true for olfactory receptors and odor molecules is currently uncertain. Here, we have investigated the response of a human olfactory receptor, OR1D2, to a broad array of odorants and found that there is no simple, direct correlation between a molecule's ability to activate this receptor and the odor impression elicited in the brain. In a parallel study on specific anosmia, we have found no evidence for odor-specific anosmia to either musk or amber, but rather to specific molecules within these categories. Cluster analysis confirmed that there is no simple correlation between molecular structure and impaired perception in either odor type. There are some differences in patterns of impairment between the two odor types and some evidence to suggest that subjects with specific anosmia to a given substance can identify its presence in a mixture. Taken together, our results show that simplistic 'lock and key' models of olfaction based on a concept of odor-quality-tuned receptors are inadequate, irrespective of the nature of the lock-key interaction. Receptor activation is only one step in a long chain of events leading from inhalation of odorants to perception of odor in the higher brain, and, therefore, although structure-odor correlations are useful tools for the design of novel odorants, caution should be exercised when extrapolating them to models of olfactory perception. Those seeking to understand the odorant-receptor interaction should use receptor activation rather than odor as input data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18618409     DOI: 10.1002/cbdv.200890101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Biodivers        ISSN: 1612-1872            Impact factor:   2.408


  14 in total

1.  Characteristic vibration patterns of odor compounds from bread-baking volatiles upon protein binding: density functional and ONIOM study and principal component analysis.

Authors:  Witcha Treesuwan; Hajime Hirao; Keiji Morokuma; Supa Hannongbua
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 1.810

2.  [Specific anosmia as a principle of olfactory perception].

Authors:  I Croy; S Olgun; L Mueller; A Schmidt; M Muench; G Gisselmann; H Hatt; T Hummel
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 3.  Genetics of taste and smell: poisons and pleasures.

Authors:  Danielle Renee Reed; Antti Knaapila
Journal:  Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.622

Review 4.  Molecular tuning of odorant receptors and its implication for odor signal processing.

Authors:  Johannes Reisert; Diego Restrepo
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 3.160

5.  Implausibility of the vibrational theory of olfaction.

Authors:  Eric Block; Seogjoo Jang; Hiroaki Matsunami; Sivakumar Sekharan; Bérénice Dethier; Mehmed Z Ertem; Sivaji Gundala; Yi Pan; Shengju Li; Zhen Li; Stephene N Lodge; Mehmet Ozbil; Huihong Jiang; Sonia F Penalba; Victor S Batista; Hanyi Zhuang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  A genome-wide study on the perception of the odorants androstenone and galaxolide.

Authors:  Antti Knaapila; Gu Zhu; Sarah E Medland; Charles J Wysocki; Grant W Montgomery; Nicholas G Martin; Margaret J Wright; Danielle R Reed
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 3.160

7.  How broadly tuned olfactory receptors equally recognize their agonists. Human OR1G1 as a test case.

Authors:  Landry Charlier; Jérémie Topin; Catherine Ronin; Soo-Kyung Kim; William A Goddard; Roman Efremov; Jérôme Golebiowski
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 9.261

8.  Chemosensory Ca2+ dynamics correlate with diverse behavioral phenotypes in human sperm.

Authors:  Thomas Veitinger; Jeffrey R Riffell; Sophie Veitinger; Jaclyn M Nascimento; Annika Triller; Charlie Chandsawangbhuwana; Katlen Schwane; Andreas Geerts; Frank Wunder; Michael W Berns; Eva M Neuhaus; Richard K Zimmer; Marc Spehr; Hanns Hatt
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  In vivo identification of eugenol-responsive and muscone-responsive mouse odorant receptors.

Authors:  Timothy S McClintock; Kaylin Adipietro; William B Titlow; Patrick Breheny; Andreas Walz; Peter Mombaerts; Hiroaki Matsunami
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 10.  Synthesis of Cyclic Fragrances via Transformations of Alkenes, Alkynes and Enynes: Strategies and Recent Progress.

Authors:  Zhigeng Lin; Baoying Huang; Lufeng Ouyang; Liyao Zheng
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 4.927

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.