| Literature DB >> 18618113 |
Onder Baran1, Metin Manisali, Berivan Cecen.
Abstract
Tension band wiring for patellar fractures is common, but some recent reports refer to disadvantages of this approach. Our anatomical and biomechanical study focused on use of tension band techniques in patellar fractures. The anatomy of the patella and tendon insertion was examined with knee magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and correlated with the technical requirements of the tension band. Tension band wiring over tendinous tissue was simulated and calculated with a cyclic biomechanical test on cow patellae. According to tension band templating on the MRI section, Kirschner wire insertion was needed for the tension band to turn over the tendinous tissue. The tension band became more stable while turning over less tendinous tissue and more adjacent bone surface. Nevertheless, cyclic loading tests indicate that all tension band applications in this study lose their initial stability. Excessive initial compression by the tension band resulted in bending of the Kirschner wire and thus reduction failure. For optimum stabilisation, tension force transfer should be done directly on bone or at least material that protects the tendon would be useful.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18618113 PMCID: PMC2898995 DOI: 10.1007/s00264-008-0602-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int Orthop ISSN: 0341-2695 Impact factor: 3.075
Fig. 1Patellar section of MRI
Fig. 2Kirschner wire templating on MRI section
Fig. 3Tension band configurations are vertically oriented figure-of-eight passed anteriorly to the tendon (a), horizontally oriented figure-of-eight (b), vertically oriented figure-of-eight passed posteriorly to tendon (c) and to eliminate the effect of the tendon a control group (d) was established as vertically oriented figure-of-eight without tendinous tissue
Fig. 4Photograph showing application of the cyclic loading
MRI results for 30 patellae: patellar length (PL), patellar thickness (PT), quadriceps tendon thickness (QTt), patellar tendon thickness (PTt) and correlation between them
| PL | PT | QTt | PTt | PL/PT | PTt/PT | QTt/PT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 34.5 | 21.6 | 5.7 | 4.8 | 1.597222 | 0.222222 | 0.263889 |
| 2 | 35.2 | 19.4 | 6.8 | 5.9 | 1.814433 | 0.304124 | 0.350515 |
| 3 | 37.9 | 18.9 | 3.9 | 3.3 | 2.005291 | 0.174603 | 0.206349 |
| 4 | 36.6 | 22.9 | 6.8 | 5.7 | 1.598253 | 0.248908 | 0.296943 |
| 5 | 35.6 | 20.3 | 6.7 | 3.3 | 1.753695 | 0.162562 | 0.330049 |
| 6 | 35.2 | 16 | 6 | 4.5 | 2.2 | 0.28125 | 0.375 |
| 7 | 33.9 | 18 | 6.9 | 5.4 | 1.883333 | 0.3 | 0.383333 |
| 8 | 33.9 | 19.2 | 6.8 | 6.1 | 1.765625 | 0.317708 | 0.354167 |
| 9 | 42.9 | 26.1 | 8 | 6.8 | 1.643678 | 0.260536 | 0.306513 |
| 10 | 35.2 | 17.1 | 5.8 | 4.7 | 2.05848 | 0.274854 | 0.339181 |
| 11 | 31.8 | 17.6 | 6.9 | 3.9 | 1.806818 | 0.221591 | 0.392045 |
| 12 | 31.7 | 20 | 5.4 | 5.7 | 1.585 | 0.285 | 0.27 |
| 13 | 30.6 | 16.2 | 6.3 | 3.9 | 1.888889 | 0.240741 | 0.388889 |
| 14 | 31 | 15.5 | 8.1 | 4.8 | 2 | 0.309677 | 0.522581 |
| 15 | 38.8 | 22.8 | 5.9 | 3.6 | 1.701754 | 0.157895 | 0.258772 |
| 16 | 33.5 | 20.8 | 8.1 | 6 | 1.610577 | 0.288462 | 0.389423 |
| 17 | 33.9 | 19.3 | 4.3 | 3.6 | 1.756477 | 0.186528 | 0.222798 |
| 18 | 37.5 | 19.7 | 6.8 | 5.7 | 1.903553 | 0.28934 | 0.345178 |
| 19 | 40.3 | 20.3 | 5.7 | 4.8 | 1.985222 | 0.236453 | 0.280788 |
| 20 | 39.9 | 23.6 | 5.5 | 5.5 | 1.690678 | 0.233051 | 0.233051 |
| 21 | 32.8 | 19 | 6.8 | 4.3 | 1.726316 | 0.226316 | 0.357895 |
| 22 | 30.6 | 17.6 | 6.5 | 3 | 1.738636 | 0.170455 | 0.369318 |
| 23 | 31.4 | 19.5 | 7.6 | 5.4 | 1.610256 | 0.276923 | 0.389744 |
| 24 | 33.2 | 19.5 | 6.8 | 4.7 | 1.702564 | 0.241026 | 0.348718 |
| 25 | 34.6 | 19.5 | 7.2 | 6.5 | 1.774359 | 0.333333 | 0.369231 |
| 26 | 33.9 | 19.7 | 6.8 | 4.8 | 1.720812 | 0.243655 | 0.345178 |
| 27 | 33.6 | 20.5 | 7.8 | 6.3 | 1.639024 | 0.307317 | 0.380488 |
| 28 | 35.3 | 19.9 | 7.2 | 4.2 | 1.773869 | 0.211055 | 0.361809 |
| 29 | 33.9 | 17.9 | 6.5 | 4.5 | 1.893855 | 0.251397 | 0.363128 |
| 30 | 31.9 | 19.4 | 5.1 | 3.6 | 1.64433 | 0.185567 | 0.262887 |
| Mean | 34.70333 | 19.59333 | 6.49 | 4.843333 | 1.782433 | 0.248085 | 0.335262 |
| Standard deviation | 3.001549 | 2.267603 | 1.024308 | 1.0431 | 0.15495 | 0.049492 | 0.065327 |
| Correlation | 0.696617 | 0.397679 | 0.061432 |
Tension band cyclic loading test results
| Tension band method | First displacement | Total displacement |
|---|---|---|
| A | 0.230 ± 0.070 | 0.893 ± 0.313 |
| B | 0.228 ± 0.056 | 0.461 ± 0.114 |
| C | 0.164 ± 0.138 | 0.572 ± 0.170 |
| D | 0.141 ± 0.041 | 0.275 ± 0.086 |
Tension band configurations are vertically oriented figure-of-eight passing anteriorly to tendon (A), horizontally oriented figure-of-eight passing anteriorly to tendon (B), vertically oriented figure-of-eight passing posteriorly to tendon (C) and vertically oriented figure-of-eight without soft tissue (D). First displacement shows value is 200 N initial traction. Total displacement shows total displacement after ten cyclic loadings