Literature DB >> 18617077

Promoting prostate-specific antigen informed decision-making. Evaluating two community-level interventions.

David L Driscoll1, Douglas J Rupert, Carol E Golin, Lauren A McCormack, Stacey L Sheridan, Brandon M Welch, Jon A Poehlman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Most medical associations recommend that patients make informed decisions about whether to be screened for prostate cancer with the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test. Studies assessing how to promote PSA informed decision-making (IDM) have been conducted almost exclusively in healthcare settings; there is a need for similar research in community settings.
METHODS: This paper describes the results of a 5-year study (2002--2007) in which two community-level interventions were developed, implemented, and evaluated in matched upper- and lower-SES comparison communities in Greensboro and Wilmington, North Carolina. Both interventions promoted PSA informed decision-making. One intervention (PSA-Only) consisted of educational information about prostate cancer and the PSA test, and the other (Men's Health) included additional information about recognizing and preventing heart attack, stroke, and colon cancer. Structured survey, semistructured interview, and structured observational data were combined to compare participating community residents' pre/post changes in knowledge, intentions, and behaviors related to PSA IDM.
RESULTS: The community-level interventions successfully engaged community participants in discussions, educated individuals, encouraged deliberation of information, and facilitated PSA test discussions with physicians. Men who participated in the PSA-Only educational sessions were more likely than those who attended the Men's Health educational sessions to discuss the PSA test with their physician (p=0.037).
CONCLUSIONS: When prospective SES-related confounding factors are matched across comparison communities, PSA IDM interventions can be shown to promote IDM. Framing the PSA test decision relative to less-ambiguous screening decisions does not appear to increase the likelihood of PSA IDM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18617077     DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.04.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  11 in total

Review 1.  Multilevel interventions: measurement and measures.

Authors:  Martin P Charns; Mary K Foster; Elaine C Alligood; Justin K Benzer; James F Burgess; Donna Li; Nathalie M McIntosh; Allison Burness; Melissa R Partin; Steven B Clauser
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2012-05

2.  Behind Closed Doors: What Happens when Patients and Providers Talk about Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening?: Survey of the Effects of a Community-Based Intervention.

Authors:  Lauren McCormack; Pamela Williams-Piehota; Carla Bann
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  A Randomized Controlled Effectiveness Trial for PSA Screening Decision Support Interventions in Two Primary Care Settings.

Authors:  Carmen L Lewis; Jared Adams; Ming Tai-Seale; Qiwen Huang; Sarah B Knowles; Matthew E Nielsen; Michael P Pignone; Louise C Walter; Dominick L Frosch
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Evaluating Community-Based Health Improvement Programs.

Authors:  Carrie E Fry; Sayeh S Nikpay; Erika Leslie; Melinda B Buntin
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 6.301

5.  Patient-physician agreement on the content of CHD prevention discussions.

Authors:  Lindy Behrend; Hossein Maymani; Megan Diehl; Ziya Gizlice; Jianwen Cai; Stacey L Sheridan
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  Effect of adding a values clarification exercise to a decision aid on heart disease prevention: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Stacey L Sheridan; Jennifer M Griffith; Lindy Behrend; Ziya Gizlice; Michael P Pignone
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 2.583

7.  Translating medical evidence to promote informed health care decisions.

Authors:  Lauren McCormack; Katherine Treiman; Carla Bann; Pamela Williams-Piehota; David Driscoll; Jon Poehlman; Cindy Soloe; Kathleen Lohr; Stacey Sheridan; Carol Golin; Samuel Cykert; Russell Harris
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-02-25       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Communication message strategies for increasing knowledge about prostate cancer screening.

Authors:  Lauren A McCormack; Carla M Bann; Pamela Williams-Piehota; David Driscoll; Cindy Soloe; Jon Poehlman; Tzy-Mey Kuo; Kathleen N Lohr; Stacey L Sheridan; Carol E Golin; Russell Harris; Samuel Cykert
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.037

9.  A decision-making model to optimize the impact of community-based health programs.

Authors:  Eduardo Pérez; Yan Li; José A Pagán
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 4.637

10.  The effect of a decision aid intervention on decision making about coronary heart disease risk reduction: secondary analyses of a randomized trial.

Authors:  Stacey L Sheridan; Lindy B Draeger; Michael P Pignone; Barbara Rimer; Shrikant I Bangdiwala; Jianwen Cai; Ziya Gizlice; Thomas C Keyserling; Ross J Simpson
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 2.796

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.