Literature DB >> 18616385

Derivation and characterization of two sibling human embryonic stem cell lines from discarded grade III embryos.

Maneesha S Inamdar1, Parvathy Venu, M S Srinivas, Kamini Rao, K VijayRaghavan.   

Abstract

Human embryonic stem (hES) cells are a valuable tool for studying human development in addition to their potential applications in regenerative medicine and drug discovery. The role of genetic background and epigenetic influences in development as well as in response to external influences such as drugs and therapies is well recognized. The great ethnic diversity in the Indian subcontinent translates to interindividual variability in drug response and disease susceptibility. For these reasons, new hES cell lines representing Indian genetic diversity will be valuable in studies of tissue-differentiation, cellular-function and for aspects of characterization of responses to drugs. We have derived two new hES cell lines, BJNhem19 and BJNhem20 from the inner cell mass (ICM) of discarded grade III human embryos that were not suitable for in vitro fertility treatment. Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) isotype analysis shows that they are genetically distinct from existing hES cell lines. Short tandem repeat (STR) analysis shows that the two cell lines are derived from sibling embryos. These cell lines show an undifferentiated phenotype in culture for more than 65 passages, show normal karyotype and express pluripotency markers such as TRA-1-60, TRA-1-81, stage-specific embryonic antigen-4 (SSEA-4), alkaline phosphatase, DNMT3B, GABRB3, GDF3, OCT4, NANOG, SOX2, TERF1, TDGF, LEFTA, THY1, and REX1. While both cell lines can differentiate into derivatives of all three germ layers in vitro, only BJNhem20 can form teratomas when transplanted into mice. We observe an increased frequency of cardiomyocyte differentiation from BJNhem20 embryoid bodies in feeder-free cultures upon induction with DMSO. Cardiomyocytes purified from such cultures survive and show rhythmic contractions for several weeks in culture. These hES cell lines have been accepted for deposit in the U.K. Stem Cell Bank and will be a useful resource for the international stem cell community.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 18616385     DOI: 10.1089/scd.2008.0131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stem Cells Dev        ISSN: 1547-3287            Impact factor:   3.272


  12 in total

1.  Derivation of human embryonic stem cells using a post-inner cell mass intermediate.

Authors:  Thomas O'Leary; Björn Heindryckx; Sylvie Lierman; Margot Van der Jeught; Galbha Duggal; Petra De Sutter; Susana M Chuva de Sousa Lopes
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 2.  Substrates and supplements for hESCs: a critical review.

Authors:  Melisa Candela Crocco; Nilo Fratnz; Adriana Bos-Mikich
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Evaluating differentiation propensity of in-house derived human embryonic stem cell lines KIND-1 and KIND-2.

Authors:  Punam Nagvenkar; Prasad Pethe; Harsha Pawani; Jyoti Telang; Neeraj Kumar; Indira Hinduja; Kusum Zaveri; Deepa Bhartiya
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 2.416

4.  Triploid and diploid embryonic stem cell lines derived from tripronuclear human zygotes.

Authors:  Xinjie Chen; Yumei Luo; Yong Fan; Lei Yue; Xueshi Wu; Yaoyong Chen; Xiaofang Sun
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Analysis of long-term culture properties and pluripotent character of two sibling human embryonic stem cell lines derived from discarded embryos.

Authors:  Parvathy Venu; Sanjukta Chakraborty; Maneesha S Inamdar
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 2.416

6.  Derivation of two new human embryonic stem cell lines from nonviable human embryos.

Authors:  Svetlana Gavrilov; Darja Marolt; Nataki C Douglas; Robert W Prosser; Imran Khalid; Mark V Sauer; Donald W Landry; Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic; Virginia E Papaioannou
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2011-05-22       Impact factor: 5.443

7.  Stem cells, progenitors & regenerative medicine: A retrospection.

Authors:  Deepa Bhartiya
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.375

8.  Governing stem cell therapy in India: regulatory vacuum or jurisdictional ambiguity?

Authors:  Shashank S Tiwari; Sujatha Raman
Journal:  New Genet Soc       Date:  2014-10-29

9.  Eighteen-year cryopreservation does not negatively affect the pluripotency of human embryos: evidence from embryonic stem cell derivation.

Authors:  Kamthorn Pruksananonda; Ruttachuk Rungsiwiwut; Pranee Numchaisrika; Vichuda Ahnonkitpanit; Nipan Isarasena; Pramuan Virutamasen
Journal:  Biores Open Access       Date:  2012-08

10.  A cost-effective system for differentiation of intestinal epithelium from human induced pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Soichiro Ogaki; Mayu Morooka; Kaito Otera; Shoen Kume
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.