Literature DB >> 1861614

Determinants of spatial priming in environmental memory.

R C Sherman1, K M Lim.   

Abstract

Spatial priming in recognizing objects in experimentally learned environments has been proposed as strong evidence for spatial organization of environmental memory. However, in all studies showing recognition priming effects, encoding and rehearsal contiguity may have coincided with spatial proximity, and thus priming may have been due to temporal associations formed during rehearsal, not encoded spatial relations per se. We investigated this question in four experiments, using a trip trial learning method in which temporal contiguity and spatial relations were independent. In Experiment 1, no spatial priming in recognition was found, even though indirect evidence suggested that subjects had encoded spatial relations. In Experiment 2, the trip trial method was compared with the free study procedure commonly used in previous priming studies. Spatial priming occurred only for free study subjects, even though the two groups were equivalent on direct measures of encoding accuracy. In Experiment 3, spatial priming in recognition was obtained with a modification of the trip trial method in which temporal and spatial contiguity were deliberately confounded. In Experiment 4, the unmodified trip trial method produced spatial priming in a location-decision task. Taken together, our results suggest that environmental memory may be spatially organized, but retrieval of object identities does not necessarily activate encoded spatial relations.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1861614     DOI: 10.3758/bf03211152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  10 in total

Review 1.  The development of spatial representations of large-scale environments.

Authors:  A W Siegel; S H White
Journal:  Adv Child Dev Behav       Date:  1975

2.  Subjective hierarchies in spatial memory.

Authors:  T P McNamara; J K Hardy; S C Hirtle
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Constraints on priming in spatial memory: naturally learned versus experimentally learned environments.

Authors:  T P McNamara; J Altarriba; M Bendele; S C Johnson; K N Clayton
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1989-07

4.  Semantic and spatial factors in environmental memory.

Authors:  A A Merrill; J C Baird
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1987-03

5.  Mental representations of spatial relations.

Authors:  T P McNamara
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  The mental representation of knowledge acquired from maps.

Authors:  T P McNamara; R Ratcliff; G McKoon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Distortions in judged spatial relations.

Authors:  A Stevens; P Coupe
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Evidence of hierarchies in cognitive maps.

Authors:  S C Hirtle; J Jonides
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1985-05

9.  Cognitive mapping: knowledge of real-world distance and location information.

Authors:  G W Evans; K Pezdek
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Learn       Date:  1980-01

10.  Verifying environmental relationships.

Authors:  R C Sherman; C Oliver; W Titus
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1980-11
  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  The representation and integration in memory of spatial and nonspatial information.

Authors:  T P McNamara; J A Halpin; J K Hardy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1992-09

2.  The human brain uses spatial schemas to represent segmented environments.

Authors:  Michael Peer; Russell A Epstein
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 10.834

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.