Literature DB >> 1861610

Some structural determinants of melody recall.

M Boltz1.   

Abstract

Sophisticated musicians were asked to recall, using musical notation, a set of unfamiliar folk tunes that varied in rhythmic structure and referents of tonality. The results showed that memory was facilitated by tonic triad members marking phrase endings, but only when their presence was highlighted by a corresponding pattern of temporal accents. Conversely, recall significantly declined when tonal information was either absent or obscured by rhythmic structure. Error analyses further revealed that the retention of overall pitch contour and information at phrase ending points varied as a function of these manipulations. The results are discussed in terms of a framework that links the acts of perceiving and remembering to a common attentional scheme.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1861610     DOI: 10.3758/bf03211148

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  27 in total

1.  Dynamic attending and responses to time.

Authors:  M R Jones; M Boltz
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Rhythm and "good endings": effects of temporal structure on tonality judgments.

Authors:  M Boltz
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-07

3.  Dynamic pattern structure in music: recent theory and research.

Authors:  M R Jones
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1987-06

4.  Rhythmic (hierarchical) versus serial structure in speech and other behavior.

Authors:  J G Martin
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1972-11       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Temporal segmentation of repeating auditory patterns.

Authors:  S Handel
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1973-11

6.  Melody recognition: the experimental application of musical rules.

Authors:  L L Cuddy; A J Cohen; J Miller
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1979-09

Review 7.  Time, our lost dimension: toward a new theory of perception, attention, and memory.

Authors:  M R Jones
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Perception of contour in music reading.

Authors:  J A Sloboda
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 1.490

9.  Some effects of rhythmic context on melody recognition.

Authors:  G Kidd; M Boltz; M R Jones
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1984

10.  The processing of structured and unstructured tonal sequences.

Authors:  D Deutsch
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1980-11
View more
  10 in total

1.  Influence of tonal and temporal expectations on chord processing and on completion judgments of chord sequences.

Authors:  Barbara Tillmann; Géraldine Lebrun-Guillaud
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-09-22

2.  The effect of task and pitch structure on pitch-time interactions in music.

Authors:  Jon B Prince; Mark A Schmuckler; William F Thompson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-04

3.  Recognition of music in long-term memory: are melodic and temporal patterns equal partners?

Authors:  S Hébert; I Peretz
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1997-07

4.  Expected endings and judged duration.

Authors:  M R Jones; M G Boltz; J M Klein
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1993-09

5.  Time estimation and expectancies.

Authors:  M G Boltz
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1993-11

6.  Effects of event structure on retrospective duration judgments.

Authors:  M G Boltz
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-10

7.  The generation of temporal and melodic expectancies during musical listening.

Authors:  M G Boltz
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-06

8.  Harmonic and rhythmic influences on musical expectancy.

Authors:  M A Schmuckler; M G Boltz
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-09

9.  Familiar Tonal Context Improves Accuracy of Pitch Interval Perception.

Authors:  Jackson E Graves; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-10-09

10.  Alarm tones, music and their elements: Analysis of reported waking sounds to counteract sleep inertia.

Authors:  Stuart J McFarlane; Jair E Garcia; Darrin S Verhagen; Adrian G Dyer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.