BACKGROUND: The transmission of drug-resistant HIV-1 can impair the virological response to antiretroviral therapy. Minority-resistant variants have been detected in acute seroconverters. We investigated the clinical relevance of the detection of majority and minority-resistant variants in an observational study in antiretroviral therapy naive, recently infected patients. METHODS: We included patients infected between 1996 and 2005, with a plasma sample obtained less than 18 months after seroconversion and prior to antiretroviral therapy initiation. Majority-resistant variants were determined by direct population sequencing. Minority-resistant variants were searched by allele-specific PCR for the mutations K103N and M184V in reverse transcriptase and L90M in protease. The association between resistance and viroimmunological response to antiretroviral therapy was estimated by using a piecewise linear mixed model. RESULTS: Majority-resistant variants were detected in 23/172 (13.4%) patients. Patients with majority-resistant variants had a lower mean plasma viral load and higher mean CD4 cell count at baseline compared with those without resistance. The decrease in viral load between 1 and 6 months on antiretroviral therapy was significantly steeper in patients with sensitive viruses compared with those with majority-resistant variants (P = 0.029). Minority-resistant variants were detected in 21/73 (29%) patients with wild-type viruses at sequencing analysis. The presence of minority-resistant variants did not modify baseline viral load and CD4 cell count and did not affect the changes in viral load and CD4 cell count. CONCLUSION: The transmission of majority-resistant variants, but not minority-resistant variants, influenced the response to antiretroviral therapy in this prospective study. The detection of the transmission of minority-resistant variants warrants further clinical validation.
BACKGROUND: The transmission of drug-resistant HIV-1 can impair the virological response to antiretroviral therapy. Minority-resistant variants have been detected in acute seroconverters. We investigated the clinical relevance of the detection of majority and minority-resistant variants in an observational study in antiretroviral therapy naive, recently infectedpatients. METHODS: We included patientsinfected between 1996 and 2005, with a plasma sample obtained less than 18 months after seroconversion and prior to antiretroviral therapy initiation. Majority-resistant variants were determined by direct population sequencing. Minority-resistant variants were searched by allele-specific PCR for the mutations K103N and M184V in reverse transcriptase and L90M in protease. The association between resistance and viroimmunological response to antiretroviral therapy was estimated by using a piecewise linear mixed model. RESULTS: Majority-resistant variants were detected in 23/172 (13.4%) patients. Patients with majority-resistant variants had a lower mean plasma viral load and higher mean CD4 cell count at baseline compared with those without resistance. The decrease in viral load between 1 and 6 months on antiretroviral therapy was significantly steeper in patients with sensitive viruses compared with those with majority-resistant variants (P = 0.029). Minority-resistant variants were detected in 21/73 (29%) patients with wild-type viruses at sequencing analysis. The presence of minority-resistant variants did not modify baseline viral load and CD4 cell count and did not affect the changes in viral load and CD4 cell count. CONCLUSION: The transmission of majority-resistant variants, but not minority-resistant variants, influenced the response to antiretroviral therapy in this prospective study. The detection of the transmission of minority-resistant variants warrants further clinical validation.
Authors: Sara Gianella; Wayne Delport; Mary E Pacold; Jason A Young; Jun Yong Choi; Susan J Little; Douglas D Richman; Sergei L Kosakovsky Pond; Davey M Smith Journal: J Virol Date: 2011-06-01 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Benjamin H Chi; Giovanina M Ellis; Namwinga Chintu; Ronald A Cantrell; Moses Sinkala; Grace M Aldrovandi; Ranjit Warrier; Felistas Mbewe; Kyle Nakamura; Elizabeth M Stringer; Lisa M Frenkel; Jeffrey S A Stringer Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 2.205
Authors: Valerie F Boltz; Wei Shao; Michael J Bale; Elias K Halvas; Brian Luke; James A McIntyre; Robert T Schooley; Shahin Lockman; Judith S Currier; Fred Sawe; Evelyn Hogg; Michael D Hughes; Mary F Kearney; John M Coffin; John W Mellors Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2019-10-03
Authors: Thomas A Toni; Eugene L Asahchop; Daniela Moisi; Michel Ntemgwa; Maureen Oliveira; Bernard Masquelier; Bluma G Brenner; Mark A Wainberg Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2009-01-26 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Alexander Hoare; Stephen J Kerr; Kiat Ruxrungtham; Jintanat Ananworanich; Matthew G Law; David A Cooper; Praphan Phanuphak; David P Wilson Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-06-08 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Max Lataillade; Jennifer Chiarella; Rong Yang; Steven Schnittman; Victoria Wirtz; Jonathan Uy; Daniel Seekins; Mark Krystal; Marco Mancini; Donnie McGrath; Birgitte Simen; Michael Egholm; Michael Kozal Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-06-03 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Julie F Weis; Jared M Baeten; Connor O McCoy; Chris Warth; Deborah Donnell; Katherine K Thomas; Craig W Hendrix; Mark A Marzinke; Nelly Mugo; Frederick A Matsen; Connie Celum; Dara A Lehman Journal: AIDS Date: 2016-01-02 Impact factor: 4.177