Literature DB >> 18614616

What next for preimplantation genetic screening? Randomized clinical trial in assessing PGS: necessary but not sufficient.

Joe Leigh Simpson1.   

Abstract

The randomized clinical trial (RCT) is a powerful experimental design that when properly executed produces generalizable results. Conducting a RCT becomes complex when technical skills are required. Without requisite skills, a RCT may yield misleading results, an elegant RCT unwittingly generating spurious results due to technical inexperience. This pitfall is applicable to procedures used to evaluate assisted reproductive technologies. RCTs assessing the value of preimplantation genetic screening, also called preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy testing--require three general prerequisites--proper study design, skilled operators (embryo biopsy), and skilled laboratory cytogeneticists (diagnosis). Lacking either of the latter two, even an elegantly designed RCT is not necessarily valid.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18614616     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/den250

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  7 in total

1.  False positive rate of an arrayCGH platform for single-cell preimplantation genetic screening and subsequent clinical application on day-3.

Authors:  Pere Mir; Lorena Rodrigo; Amparo Mercader; Pilar Buendía; Emilia Mateu; Miguel Milán-Sánchez; Vanessa Peinado; Antonio Pellicer; Jose Remohí; Carlos Simón; Carmen Rubio
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Fluorescent in situ hybridization of human sperm: diagnostics, indications, and therapeutic implications.

Authors:  Ranjith Ramasamy; Stefan Besada; Dolores J Lamb
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Are zona pellucida laser drilling and polar body biopsy safe for in vitro matured oocytes?

Authors:  Ibrahim Hammoud; Denise Molina-Gomes; Martine Albert; Marianne Bergere; Marc Bailly; Robert Wainer; Jacqueline Selva; Francois Vialard
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2010-05-22       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Quantitative decision-making in preimplantation genetic (aneuploidy) screening (PGS).

Authors:  Michael C Summers; Andrew D Foland
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2009-10-22       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  What next for preimplantation genetic screening? High mitotic chromosome instability rate provides the biological basis for the low success rate.

Authors:  Evelyne Vanneste; Thierry Voet; Cindy Melotte; Sophie Debrock; Karen Sermon; Catherine Staessen; Inge Liebaers; Jean-Pierre Fryns; Thomas D'Hooghe; Joris R Vermeesch
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  New tools for embryo selection: comprehensive chromosome screening by array comparative genomic hybridization.

Authors:  Lorena Rodrigo; Emilia Mateu; Amparo Mercader; Ana Cristina Cobo; Vanessa Peinado; Miguel Milán; Nasser Al-Asmar; Inmaculada Campos-Galindo; Sandra García-Herrero; Pere Mir; Carlos Simón; Carmen Rubio
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Pre-implantation genetic screening using fluorescence in situ hybridization in couples of Indian ethnicity: Is there a scope?

Authors:  Shailaja Gada Saxena; Kundanbala Desai; Lata Shewale; Prabhat Ranjan
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2014-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.