Literature DB >> 18614144

Laparoscopic versus open repair of incisional/ventral hernia: a meta-analysis.

Muhammad S Sajid1, Syed A Bokhari, Ali S Mallick, Elizabeth Cheek, Mirza K Baig.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this article is to analyze laparoscopic versus open repair of incisional/ventral hernia (IVH).
METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was undertaken to analyze clinical trials on IVH.
RESULTS: Five randomized controlled trials involving a total of 366 patients were analyzed. There were 183 patients in each group. Open repair of IVH was associated with significantly higher complication rates and longer hospital stays than laparoscopic repair. There was also some evidence that surgical times may be longer for open repair of IVH. However, statistically there was no difference in wound pain or recurrence rates.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic repair of IVH is safe, with fewer complications and shorter hospital stays, and possibly a shorter surgical time. However, postoperative pain and recurrence rates are similar for both techniques. Hence, the laparoscopic approach may be considered for IVH repair if technically feasible, but more trials with longer follow-up evaluations are required to strengthen the evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18614144     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.12.051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  75 in total

1.  Technical feasibility of a robotic-assisted ventral hernia repair.

Authors:  Guido Beldi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Laparoscopic mesh measurement.

Authors:  Chris I W Lauder; Andrew Strickland; Guy J Maddern
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic hernia repair comparing titanium-coated lightweight mesh and medium-weight composite mesh.

Authors:  Alfredo Moreno-Egea; Andrés Carrillo-Alcaraz; Víctor Soria-Aledo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-07-07       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Laparoscopic surgery: A qualified systematic review.

Authors:  Alexander Buia; Florian Stockhausen; Ernst Hanisch
Journal:  World J Methodol       Date:  2015-12-26

5.  Defining a Research Agenda for Patient-Reported Outcomes in Surgery: Using a Delphi Survey of Stakeholders.

Authors:  Michael L Pezold; Andrea L Pusic; Wess A Cohen; James P Hollenberg; Zeeshan Butt; David R Flum; Larissa K Temple
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 14.766

6.  Postoperative surgical site infections after ventral/incisional hernia repair: a comparison of open and laparoscopic outcomes.

Authors:  Christodoulos Kaoutzanis; Stefan W Leichtle; Nicolas J Mouawad; Kathleen B Welch; Richard M Lampman; Robert K Cleary
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Risk-adjusted procedure tailoring leads to uniformly low complication rates in ventral and incisional hernia repair: a propensity score analysis and internal validation of classification criteria.

Authors:  U A Dietz; A Fleischhacker; S Menzel; U Klinge; C Jurowich; K Haas; P Heuschmann; C-T Germer; A Wiegering
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 4.739

8.  Influence of fibrin sealant in preventing postoperative seroma and normalizing the abdominal wall after laparoscopic repair of ventral hernia.

Authors:  Salvador Morales-Conde; Gonzalo Suárez-Artacho; María Socas; Antonio Barranco
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Surgical treatment for giant incisional hernia: a qualitative systematic review.

Authors:  A Eriksson; J Rosenberg; T Bisgaard
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2013-03-02       Impact factor: 4.739

10.  Prosthetic mesh "slim-cigarette like" for laparoscopic repair of ventral hernias: a new technique without transabdominal fixation sutures.

Authors:  S A Canton; S Merigliano; C Pasquali
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2016-03-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.