BACKGROUND: Understanding the transcriptional regulation mechanisms in response to environmental challenges is of fundamental importance in biology. Transcription factors associated to response elements and the chromatin structure had proven to play important roles in gene expression regulation. We have analyzed promoter regions of dipteran genes induced in response to immune challenge, in search for particular sequence patterns involved in their transcriptional regulation. RESULTS: 5' upstream regions of D. melanogaster and A. gambiae immunity-induced genes and their corresponding orthologous genes in 11 non-melanogaster drosophilid species and Ae. aegypti share enrichment in AT-rich short motifs. AT-rich motifs are associated with nucleosome formation as predicted by two different algorithms. In A. gambiae and D. melanogaster, many immunity genes 5' upstream sequences also showed NFkappaB response elements, located within 500 bp from the transcription start site. In A. gambiae, the frequency of ATAA motif near the NFkappaB response elements was increased, suggesting a functional link between nucleosome formation/remodelling and NFkappaB regulation of transcription. CONCLUSION: AT-rich motif enrichment in 5' upstream sequences in A. gambiae, Ae. aegypti and the Drosophila genus immunity genes suggests a particular pattern of nucleosome formation/chromatin organization. The co-occurrence of such motifs with the NFkappaB response elements suggests that these sequence signatures may be functionally involved in transcriptional activation during dipteran immune response. AT-rich motif enrichment in regulatory regions in this group of co-regulated genes could represent an evolutionary constrained signature in dipterans and perhaps other distantly species.
BACKGROUND: Understanding the transcriptional regulation mechanisms in response to environmental challenges is of fundamental importance in biology. Transcription factors associated to response elements and the chromatin structure had proven to play important roles in gene expression regulation. We have analyzed promoter regions of dipteran genes induced in response to immune challenge, in search for particular sequence patterns involved in their transcriptional regulation. RESULTS: 5' upstream regions of D. melanogaster and A. gambiae immunity-induced genes and their corresponding orthologous genes in 11 non-melanogaster drosophilid species and Ae. aegypti share enrichment in AT-rich short motifs. AT-rich motifs are associated with nucleosome formation as predicted by two different algorithms. In A. gambiae and D. melanogaster, many immunity genes 5' upstream sequences also showed NFkappaB response elements, located within 500 bp from the transcription start site. In A. gambiae, the frequency of ATAA motif near the NFkappaB response elements was increased, suggesting a functional link between nucleosome formation/remodelling and NFkappaB regulation of transcription. CONCLUSION: AT-rich motif enrichment in 5' upstream sequences in A. gambiae, Ae. aegypti and the Drosophila genus immunity genes suggests a particular pattern of nucleosome formation/chromatin organization. The co-occurrence of such motifs with the NFkappaB response elements suggests that these sequence signatures may be functionally involved in transcriptional activation during dipteran immune response. AT-rich motif enrichment in regulatory regions in this group of co-regulated genes could represent an evolutionary constrained signature in dipterans and perhaps other distantly species.
Authors: Kate Senger; Grant W Armstrong; William J Rowell; Jennifer M Kwan; Michele Markstein; Michael Levine Journal: Mol Cell Date: 2004-01-16 Impact factor: 17.970
Authors: Stephen Richards; Yue Liu; Brian R Bettencourt; Pavel Hradecky; Stan Letovsky; Rasmus Nielsen; Kevin Thornton; Melissa J Hubisz; Rui Chen; Richard P Meisel; Olivier Couronne; Sujun Hua; Mark A Smith; Peili Zhang; Jing Liu; Harmen J Bussemaker; Marinus F van Batenburg; Sally L Howells; Steven E Scherer; Erica Sodergren; Beverly B Matthews; Madeline A Crosby; Andrew J Schroeder; Daniel Ortiz-Barrientos; Catharine M Rives; Michael L Metzker; Donna M Muzny; Graham Scott; David Steffen; David A Wheeler; Kim C Worley; Paul Havlak; K James Durbin; Amy Egan; Rachel Gill; Jennifer Hume; Margaret B Morgan; George Miner; Cerissa Hamilton; Yanmei Huang; Lenée Waldron; Daniel Verduzco; Kerstin P Clerc-Blankenburg; Inna Dubchak; Mohamed A F Noor; Wyatt Anderson; Kevin P White; Andrew G Clark; Stephen W Schaeffer; William Gelbart; George M Weinstock; Richard A Gibbs Journal: Genome Res Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 9.043
Authors: Evgenia V Kriventseva; Anastasios C Koutsos; Claudia Blass; Fotis C Kafatos; George K Christophides; Evgeny M Zdobnov Journal: Genome Res Date: 2005-05-17 Impact factor: 9.043
Authors: E Birney; D Andrews; M Caccamo; Y Chen; L Clarke; G Coates; T Cox; F Cunningham; V Curwen; T Cutts; T Down; R Durbin; X M Fernandez-Suarez; P Flicek; S Gräf; M Hammond; J Herrero; K Howe; V Iyer; K Jekosch; A Kähäri; A Kasprzyk; D Keefe; F Kokocinski; E Kulesha; D London; I Longden; C Melsopp; P Meidl; B Overduin; A Parker; G Proctor; A Prlic; M Rae; D Rios; S Redmond; M Schuster; I Sealy; S Searle; J Severin; G Slater; D Smedley; J Smith; A Stabenau; J Stalker; S Trevanion; A Ureta-Vidal; J Vogel; S White; C Woodwark; T J P Hubbard Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2006-01-01 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Douglas H Sieglaff; W Augustine Dunn; Xiaohui S Xie; Karyn Megy; Osvaldo Marinotti; Anthony A James Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2009-02-11 Impact factor: 11.205