Literature DB >> 18611406

Delay of selective attention during the attentional blink.

Edward Vul1, Deborah Hanus, Nancy Kanwisher.   

Abstract

The attentional blink is the inability to report the second of two targets in an RSVP stream when they are separated by 200-500 ms. Recent evidence shows that this failure results from three dissociable changes to the properties of temporal selective attention. During the attentional blink, selection is suppressed (items are selected less effectively, resulting in greater levels of random guessing), diffused (more letters around the target are selected), and delayed (the items that are selected tend to be later in the RSVP stream relative to the cue) [Vul, E., Nieuwenstein, M., & Kanwisher, N. (2008). Temporal selection is suppressed, delayed, and diffused during the attentional blink. Psychological Science, 19(1), 55-61]. Here we assess the properties of the delay in selection and evaluate how the delay contributes to the attentional blink. First, by pre-cueing, we manipulate the delay of selective attention and show that neither delay nor suppression alone is sufficient to account for the failure to report the second target; thus both play a role in the usual attentional blink. Second, we explore the persistence of the delay effect over much longer T1-T2 SOAs and show that the effect remains strong at lags of 1,400 ms and appears to subside with a time-constant of roughly 500 ms. Third, we manipulate RSVP rate and find that the "delay" of selection is a delay in time, independent of the number of items.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18611406      PMCID: PMC2610420          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.06.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  18 in total

1.  Attentional requirements is visual detection and identification: evidence from the attentional blink.

Authors:  J Kawahara; V Di Lollo; J T Enns
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Intrusion patterns in rapid serial visual presentation tasks with two response dimensions.

Authors:  J Botella; M L Garcia; M Barriopedro
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-11

3.  Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: an attentional blink? .

Authors:  J E Raymond; K L Shapiro; K M Arnell
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  The reviewing of object files: object-specific integration of information.

Authors:  D Kahneman; A Treisman; B J Gibbs
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Temporal selection is suppressed, delayed, and diffused during the attentional blink.

Authors:  Edward Vul; Mark Nieuwenstein; Nancy Kanwisher
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-01

6.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

7.  Types and tokens in visual processing: a double dissociation between the attentional blink and repetition blindness.

Authors:  M M Chun
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Dynamics of automatic and controlled visual attention.

Authors:  E Weichselgartner; G Sperling
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-11-06       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Attention gating in short-term visual memory.

Authors:  A Reeves; G Sperling
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation.

Authors:  M M Chun; M C Potter
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  5 in total

1.  Attention as inference: selection is probabilistic; responses are all-or-none samples.

Authors:  Edward Vul; Deborah Hanus; Nancy Kanwisher
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2009-11

2.  Temporal trade-off effects in sustained attention: dynamics in visual cortex predict the target detection performance during distraction.

Authors:  Matthias J Wieser; Andreas Keil
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Temporal Dynamics of Visual Attention Allocation.

Authors:  Jongmin Moon; Seonggyu Choe; Seul Lee; Oh-Sang Kwon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  The role of individual differences in attentional blink phenomenon and real-time-strategy game proficiency.

Authors:  Natalia Jakubowska; Paweł Dobrowolski; Natalia Rutkowska; Maciej Skorko; Monika Myśliwiec; Jakub Michalak; Aneta Brzezicka
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2021-04-14

5.  Individual differences in the attentional blink: the temporal profile of blinkers and non-blinkers.

Authors:  Charlotte Willems; Stefan M Wierda; Eva van Viegen; Sander Martens
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.