Literature DB >> 18181792

Temporal selection is suppressed, delayed, and diffused during the attentional blink.

Edward Vul1, Mark Nieuwenstein, Nancy Kanwisher.   

Abstract

How does temporal selection work, and along what dimensions does it vary from one instance to the next? We explored these questions using a phenomenon in which temporal selection goes awry. In the attentional blink, subjects fail to report the second of a pair of targets (T1 and T2) when they are presented at stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs) of roughly 200 to 500 ms. We directly tested the properties of temporal selection during the blink by analyzing distractor intrusions at a fast rate of item presentation. Our analysis shows that attentional selection is (a) suppressed, (b) delayed, and (c) diffused in time during the attentional blink. These effects are dissociated by their time course: The measure of each effect returns to the baseline value at a different SOA. Our results constrain theories of the attentional blink and indicate that temporal selection varies along at least three dissociable dimensions: efficacy, latency, and precision.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18181792      PMCID: PMC2744451          DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02046.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  17 in total

1.  Intrusion patterns in rapid serial visual presentation tasks with two response dimensions.

Authors:  J Botella; M L Garcia; M Barriopedro
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-11

2.  Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: an attentional blink? .

Authors:  J E Raymond; K L Shapiro; K M Arnell
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Temporal binding errors are redistributed by the attentional blink.

Authors:  M M Chun
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1997-11

4.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

5.  Types and tokens in visual processing: a double dissociation between the attentional blink and repetition blindness.

Authors:  M M Chun
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Dynamics of automatic and controlled visual attention.

Authors:  E Weichselgartner; G Sperling
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-11-06       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Repetition blindness: type recognition without token individuation.

Authors:  N G Kanwisher
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1987-11

8.  Attention gating in short-term visual memory.

Authors:  A Reeves; G Sperling
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Similarity determines the attentional blink.

Authors:  J E Raymond; K L Shapiro; K M Arnell
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation.

Authors:  M M Chun; M C Potter
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  33 in total

1.  Using prediction markets to estimate the reproducibility of scientific research.

Authors:  Anna Dreber; Thomas Pfeiffer; Johan Almenberg; Siri Isaksson; Brad Wilson; Yiling Chen; Brian A Nosek; Magnus Johannesson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Whole Report versus Partial Report in RSVP Sentences.

Authors:  Mary C Potter; Mark Nieuwenstein; Nina Strohminger
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.059

3.  Personal names do not always survive the attentional blink: Behavioral evidence for a flexible locus of selection.

Authors:  Barry Giesbrecht; Jocelyn L Sy; Megan K Lewis
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Top-down control is not lost in the attentional blink: evidence from intact endogenous cueing.

Authors:  Dexuan Zhang; Liping Shao; Mark Nieuwenstein; Xiaolin Zhou
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-10       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Attention as inference: selection is probabilistic; responses are all-or-none samples.

Authors:  Edward Vul; Deborah Hanus; Nancy Kanwisher
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2009-11

6.  Unmasking the attentional blink.

Authors:  Mark R Nieuwenstein; Mary C Potter; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Sleep after practice reduces the attentional blink.

Authors:  Nicola Cellini; Patrick T Goodbourn; Elizabeth A McDevitt; Paolo Martini; Alex O Holcombe; Sara C Mednick
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 8.  The attentional blink: a review of data and theory.

Authors:  Paul E Dux; René Marois
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Prolonged reduction of electrocortical activity predicts correct performance during rapid serial visual processing.

Authors:  Andreas Keil; Sabine Heim
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2009-04-14       Impact factor: 4.016

10.  Attention increases the temporal precision of conscious perception: verifying the Neural-ST Model.

Authors:  Srivas Chennu; Patrick Craston; Brad Wyble; Howard Bowman
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.