Literature DB >> 18606447

The effect of silica nanoparticle-modified surfaces on cell morphology, cytoskeletal organization and function.

Anna M Lipski1, Christopher J Pino, Frederick R Haselton, I-Wei Chen, V Prasad Shastri.   

Abstract

Chemical and morphological characteristics of a biomaterial surface are thought to play an important role in determining cellular differentiation and apoptosis. In this report, we investigate the effect of nanoparticle (NP) assemblies arranged on a flat substrate on cytoskeletal organization, proliferation and metabolic activity on two cell types, Bovine aortic endothelial cells (BAECs) and mouse calvarial preosteoblasts (MC3T3-E1). To vary roughness without altering chemistry, glass substrates were coated with monodispersed silica nanoparticles of 50, 100 and 300 nm in diameter. The impact of surface roughness at the nanoscale on cell morphology was studied by quantifying cell spreading, shape, cytoskeletal F-actin alignment, and recruitment of focal adhesion complexes (FAC) using image analysis. Metabolic activity was followed using a thiazolyl blue tetrazolium bromide assay. In the two cell types tested, surface roughness introduced by nanoparticles had cell type specific effects on cell morphology and metabolism. While BAEC on NP-modified substrates exhibited smaller cell areas and fewer focal adhesion complexes compared to BAEC grown on glass, MC3T3-E1 cells in contrast exhibited larger cell areas on NP-modified surfaces and an increased number of FACs, in comparison to unmodified glass. However, both cell types on 50 nm NP had the highest proliferation rates (comparable to glass control) whereas cells grown on 300 nm NP exhibited inhibited proliferation. Interestingly, for both cell types surface roughness promoted the formation of long, thick F-actin fibers, which aligned with the long axis of each cell. These findings are consistent with our earlier result that osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal progenitor cells is enhanced on NP-modified surfaces. Our finding that nanoroughness, as imparted by nanoparticle assemblies, effects cellular processes in a cell specific manner, can have far reaching consequences on the development of "smart" biomaterials especially for directing stem cell differentiation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18606447      PMCID: PMC2856311          DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.06.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  38 in total

1.  Specific proteins mediate enhanced osteoblast adhesion on nanophase ceramics.

Authors:  T J Webster; C Ergun; R H Doremus; R W Siegel; R Bizios
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  2000-09-05

2.  Low pressure plasma treatment of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate): toward tailored polymer surfaces for tissue engineering scaffolds.

Authors:  Mirko Nitschke; Gerhilt Schmack; Andreas Janke; Frank Simon; Dieter Pleul; Carsten Werner
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  2002-03-15

3.  Characterization of microrough bioactive glass surface: surface reactions and osteoblast responses in vitro.

Authors:  A Itälä; H O Ylänen; J Yrjans; T Heino; T Hentunen; M Hupa; H T Aro
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  2002-12-05

4.  Cells react to nanoscale order and symmetry in their surroundings.

Authors:  A S G Curtis; N Gadegaard; M J Dalby; M O Riehle; C D W Wilkinson; G Aitchison
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nanobioscience       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.935

5.  Combinatorial screen of the effect of surface energy on fibronectin-mediated osteoblast adhesion, spreading and proliferation.

Authors:  Scott B Kennedy; Newell R Washburn; Carl George Simon; Eric J Amis
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2006-03-24       Impact factor: 12.479

6.  The control of human mesenchymal cell differentiation using nanoscale symmetry and disorder.

Authors:  Matthew J Dalby; Nikolaj Gadegaard; Rahul Tare; Abhay Andar; Mathis O Riehle; Pawel Herzyk; Chris D W Wilkinson; Richard O C Oreffo
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2007-09-23       Impact factor: 43.841

Review 7.  Extracellular matrix signaling: integration of form and function in normal and malignant cells.

Authors:  N Boudreau; M J Bissell
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 8.382

8.  Mammalian chondrocytes expanded in the presence of fibroblast growth factor 2 maintain the ability to differentiate and regenerate three-dimensional cartilaginous tissue.

Authors:  I Martin; G Vunjak-Novakovic; J Yang; R Langer; L E Freed
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1999-12-15       Impact factor: 3.905

9.  Role of serum vitronectin and fibronectin in adhesion of fibroblasts following seeding onto tissue culture polystyrene.

Authors:  J G Steele; G Johnson; P A Underwood
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1992-07

10.  Roles of serum vitronectin and fibronectin in initial attachment of human vein endothelial cells and dermal fibroblasts on oxygen- and nitrogen-containing surfaces made by radiofrequency plasmas.

Authors:  J G Steele; G Johnson; C McFarland; B A Dalton; T R Gengenbach; R C Chatelier; P A Underwood; H J Griesser
Journal:  J Biomater Sci Polym Ed       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.517

View more
  30 in total

1.  Designer Hydrogels for Precision Control of Oxygen Tension and Mechanical Properties.

Authors:  Michael Blatchley; Kyung Min Park; Sharon Gerecht
Journal:  J Mater Chem B       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 6.331

2.  Exo70 isoform switching upon epithelial-mesenchymal transition mediates cancer cell invasion.

Authors:  Hezhe Lu; Jianglan Liu; Shujing Liu; Jingwen Zeng; Deqiang Ding; Russ P Carstens; Yusheng Cong; Xiaowei Xu; Wei Guo
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 12.270

3.  The effects of combined micron-/submicron-scale surface roughness and nanoscale features on cell proliferation and differentiation.

Authors:  Rolando A Gittens; Taylor McLachlan; Rene Olivares-Navarrete; Ye Cai; Simon Berner; Rina Tannenbaum; Zvi Schwartz; Kenneth H Sandhage; Barbara D Boyan
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 4.  Do nanomedicines require novel safety assessments to ensure their safety for long-term human use?

Authors:  Peter Hoet; Barbara Legiest; Jorina Geys; Benoit Nemery
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.606

5.  Delivering regeneration.

Authors:  V Prasad Shastri
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.617

Review 6.  Biomaterial substrate modifications that influence cell-material interactions to prime cellular responses to nonviral gene delivery.

Authors:  Amy Mantz; Angela K Pannier
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2019-01-08

7.  Stochastic nanoroughness modulates neuron-astrocyte interactions and function via mechanosensing cation channels.

Authors:  Nils R Blumenthal; Ola Hermanson; Bernd Heimrich; V Prasad Shastri
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-10-27       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Role of cytoskeleton in controlling the disorder strength of cellular nanoscale architecture.

Authors:  Dhwanil Damania; Hariharan Subramanian; Ashish K Tiwari; Yolanda Stypula; Dhananjay Kunte; Prabhakar Pradhan; Hemant K Roy; Vadim Backman
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Injectable nanosilica-chitosan microparticles for bone regeneration applications.

Authors:  Bipin Gaihre; Beata Lecka-Czernik; Ambalangodage C Jayasuriya
Journal:  J Biomater Appl       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 2.646

10.  Mechanosensitivity Occurs along the Adhesome's Force Train and Affects Traction Stress.

Authors:  Robert J Asaro; Kuanpo Lin; Qiang Zhu
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2019-09-07       Impact factor: 4.033

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.