PURPOSE: Pretreatment with cyclosporine, a P-glycoprotein (P-gp) modulator increases brain uptake of 4-(2'-methoxyphenyl)-1-[2'-(N-2"-pyridinyl)-p-[(18)F]fluorobenzamido]ethylpiperazine ([(18)F]MPPF) for binding to hydroxytryptamine(1A) (5-HT(1A)) receptors. Those increases were quantified in rat brain with in vivo microPET and ex vivo tissue studies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Each Sprague-Dawley rat (n = 4) received a baseline [(18)F]MPPF microPET scan followed by second scan 2-3 weeks later that included cyclosporine pretreatment (50 mg/kg, i.p.). Maximum a posteriori reconstructed images and volumetric ROIs were used to generate dynamic radioactivity concentration measurements for hippocampus, striatum, and cerebellum, with simplified reference tissue method (SRTM) analysis. Western blots were used to semiquantify P-gp regional distribution in brain. RESULTS: MicroPET studies showed that hippocampus uptake of [(18)F]MPPF was increased after cyclosporine; ex vivo studies showed similar increases in hippocampus and frontal cortex at 30 min, and for heart and kidney at 2.5 and 5 min, without concomitant increases in [(18)F]MPPF plasma concentration. P-gp content in cerebellum was twofold higher than in hippocampus or frontal cortex. CONCLUSIONS: These studies confirm and extend prior ex vivo results (J. Passchier, et al., Eur J Pharmacol, 2000) that showed [(18)F]MPPF as a substrate for P-gp. Our microPET results showed that P-gp modulation of [(18)F]MPPF binding to 5-HT(1A) receptors can be imaged in rat hippocampus. The heterogeneous brain distribution of P-gp appeared to invalidate the use of cerebellum as a nonspecific reference region for SRTM modeling. Regional quantitation of P-gp may be necessary for accurate PET assessment of 5-HT(1A) receptor density when based on tracer uptake sensitive to P-gp modulation.
PURPOSE: Pretreatment with cyclosporine, a P-glycoprotein (P-gp) modulator increases brain uptake of 4-(2'-methoxyphenyl)-1-[2'-(N-2"-pyridinyl)-p-[(18)F]fluorobenzamido]ethylpiperazine ([(18)F]MPPF) for binding to hydroxytryptamine(1A) (5-HT(1A)) receptors. Those increases were quantified in rat brain with in vivo microPET and ex vivo tissue studies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Each Sprague-Dawley rat (n = 4) received a baseline [(18)F]MPPF microPET scan followed by second scan 2-3 weeks later that included cyclosporine pretreatment (50 mg/kg, i.p.). Maximum a posteriori reconstructed images and volumetric ROIs were used to generate dynamic radioactivity concentration measurements for hippocampus, striatum, and cerebellum, with simplified reference tissue method (SRTM) analysis. Western blots were used to semiquantify P-gp regional distribution in brain. RESULTS: MicroPET studies showed that hippocampus uptake of [(18)F]MPPF was increased after cyclosporine; ex vivo studies showed similar increases in hippocampus and frontal cortex at 30 min, and for heart and kidney at 2.5 and 5 min, without concomitant increases in [(18)F]MPPF plasma concentration. P-gp content in cerebellum was twofold higher than in hippocampus or frontal cortex. CONCLUSIONS: These studies confirm and extend prior ex vivo results (J. Passchier, et al., Eur J Pharmacol, 2000) that showed [(18)F]MPPF as a substrate for P-gp. Our microPET results showed that P-gp modulation of [(18)F]MPPF binding to 5-HT(1A) receptors can be imaged in rat hippocampus. The heterogeneous brain distribution of P-gp appeared to invalidate the use of cerebellum as a nonspecific reference region for SRTM modeling. Regional quantitation of P-gp may be necessary for accurate PET assessment of 5-HT(1A) receptor density when based on tracer uptake sensitive to P-gp modulation.
Authors: J Passchier; A van Waarde; R M Pieterman; P H Elsinga; J Pruim; H N Hendrikse; A T Willemsen; W Vaalburg Journal: Nucl Med Biol Date: 2000-07 Impact factor: 2.408
Authors: Daniel J Rubins; William P Melega; Goran Lacan; Baldwin Way; Alain Plenevaux; Andre Luxen; Simon R Cherry Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Jeih-San Liow; Shuiyu Lu; Julie A McCarron; Jinsoo Hong; John L Musachio; Victor W Pike; Robert B Innis; Sami S Zoghbi Journal: Synapse Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 2.562
Authors: Peng Hsiao; Lucy Sasongko; Jeanne M Link; David A Mankoff; Mark Muzi; Ann C Collier; Jashvant D Unadkat Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 2006-01-13 Impact factor: 4.030
Authors: K S Bankiewicz; J L Eberling; M Kohutnicka; W Jagust; P Pivirotto; J Bringas; J Cunningham; T F Budinger; J Harvey-White Journal: Exp Neurol Date: 2000-07 Impact factor: 5.330
Authors: Joost Bart; Antoon T M Willemsen; Harry J M Groen; Winette T A van der Graaf; Theodora D Wegman; Willem Vaalburg; Elisabeth G E de Vries; N Harry Hendrikse Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Zhude Tu; Shihong Li; Jinbin Xu; Wenhua Chu; Lynne A Jones; Robert R Luedtke; Robert H Mach Journal: Nucl Med Biol Date: 2011-03-03 Impact factor: 2.408
Authors: Edmond Teng; Vladimir Kepe; Sally A Frautschy; Jie Liu; Nagichettiar Satyamurthy; Fusheng Yang; Ping-Ping Chen; Graham B Cole; Mychica R Jones; Sung-Cheng Huang; Dorothy G Flood; Stephen P Trusko; Gary W Small; Gregory M Cole; Jorge R Barrio Journal: Neurobiol Dis Date: 2011-05-13 Impact factor: 5.996
Authors: Kristina Herfert; Julia G Mannheim; Laura Kuebler; Sabina Marciano; Mario Amend; Christoph Parl; Hanna Napieczynska; Florian M Maier; Salvador Castaneda Vega; Bernd J Pichler Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2020-04 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Claudia Kuntner; Jens P Bankstahl; Marion Bankstahl; Johann Stanek; Thomas Wanek; Gloria Stundner; Rudolf Karch; Rebecca Brauner; Martin Meier; Xiaoqi Ding; Markus Müller; Wolfgang Löscher; Oliver Langer Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2009-12-17 Impact factor: 9.236