Literature DB >> 18604246

Complementing mutations in core binding factor leukemias: from mouse models to clinical applications.

A M S Müller1, J Duque, J A Shizuru, M Lübbert.   

Abstract

A great proportion of acute myeloid leukemias (AMLs) display cytogenetic abnormalities including chromosomal aberrations and/or submicroscopic mutations. These abnormalities significantly influence the prognosis of the disease. Hence, a thorough genetic work-up is an essential constituent of standard diagnostic procedures. Core binding factor (CBF) leukemias denote AMLs with chromosomal aberrations disrupting one of the CBF transcription factor genes; the most common examples are translocation t(8;21) and inversion inv(16), which result in the generation of the AML1-ETO and CBFbeta-MYH11 fusion proteins, respectively. However, in murine models, these alterations alone do not suffice to generate full-blown leukemia, but rather, complementary events are required. In fact, a substantial proportion of primary CBF leukemias display additional activating mutations, mostly of the receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) c-KIT. The awareness of the impact and prognostic relevance of these 'second hits' is increasing with a wider range of mutations tested in clinical trials. Furthermore, novel agents targeting RTKs are emanating rapidly and entering therapeutic regimens. Here, we present a concise review on complementing mutations in CBF leukemias including pathophysiology, mouse models, and clinical implications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18604246     DOI: 10.1038/onc.2008.196

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncogene        ISSN: 0950-9232            Impact factor:   9.867


  30 in total

1.  KIT with D816 mutations cooperates with CBFB-MYH11 for leukemogenesis in mice.

Authors:  Ling Zhao; Jan J Melenhorst; Lemlem Alemu; Martha Kirby; Stacie Anderson; Maggie Kench; Shelley Hoogstraten-Miller; Lauren Brinster; Yasuhiko Kamikubo; D Gary Gilliland; P Paul Liu
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  Distinct classes of c-Kit-activating mutations differ in their ability to promote RUNX1-ETO-associated acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Heidi J Nick; Hyung-Gyoon Kim; Chia-Wei Chang; Kevin W Harris; Vishnu Reddy; Christopher A Klug
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 3.  Acute myeloid leukemia stem cells and CD33-targeted immunotherapy.

Authors:  Roland B Walter; Frederick R Appelbaum; Elihu H Estey; Irwin D Bernstein
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 22.113

4.  A FOXO1-induced oncogenic network defines the AML1-ETO preleukemic program.

Authors:  Shan Lin; Anetta Ptasinska; Xiaoting Chen; Mahesh Shrestha; Salam A Assi; Paulynn S Chin; Maria R Imperato; B J Aronow; Jingsong Zhang; Matthew T Weirauch; Constanze Bonifer; James C Mulloy
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Core-binding factor acute myeloid leukemia in pediatric patients enrolled in the AIEOP AML 2002/01 trial: screening and prognostic impact of c-KIT mutations.

Authors:  E Manara; V Bisio; R Masetti; V Beqiri; R Rondelli; G Menna; C Micalizzi; N Santoro; F Locatelli; G Basso; M Pigazzi
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 6.  AML1-ETO driven acute leukemia: insights into pathogenesis and potential therapeutic approaches.

Authors:  Megan A Hatlen; Lan Wang; Stephen D Nimer
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 4.592

7.  Differentiation therapy for the treatment of t(8;21) acute myeloid leukemia using histone deacetylase inhibitors.

Authors:  Michael Bots; Inge Verbrugge; Benjamin P Martin; Jessica M Salmon; Margherita Ghisi; Adele Baker; Kym Stanley; Jake Shortt; Gert J Ossenkoppele; Johannes Zuber; Amy R Rappaport; Peter Atadja; Scott W Lowe; Ricky W Johnstone
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  Histone-binding of DPF2 mediates its repressive role in myeloid differentiation.

Authors:  Ferdinand M Huber; Sarah M Greenblatt; Andrew M Davenport; Concepcion Martinez; Ye Xu; Ly P Vu; Stephen D Nimer; André Hoelz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Attenuation of AML1-ETO cellular dysregulation correlates with increased leukemogenic potential.

Authors:  Russell C DeKelver; Ming Yan; Eun-Young Ahn; Wei-Jong Shia; Nancy A Speck; Dong-Er Zhang
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 22.113

10.  Supraphysiologic levels of the AML1-ETO isoform AE9a are essential for transformation.

Authors:  Kevin A Link; Shan Lin; Mahesh Shrestha; Melissa Bowman; Mark Wunderlich; Clara D Bloomfield; Gang Huang; James C Mulloy
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.