| Literature DB >> 18601716 |
Christophe Antonio-Nkondjio1, Cyrille Ndo, Pierre Kengne, Louis Mukwaya, Parfait Awono-Ambene, Didier Fontenille, Frédéric Simard.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Anopheles moucheti is a major malaria vector in forested areas of Africa. However, despite its important epidemiological role, it remains poorly known and insufficiently studied. Here, levels of genetic differentiation were estimated between different A. moucheti populations sampled throughout its distribution range in Central Africa.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18601716 PMCID: PMC2483286 DOI: 10.1186/1475-2875-7-120
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Malar J ISSN: 1475-2875 Impact factor: 2.979
Figure 1A schematic map of Africa showing sampling sites for A. moucheti in Cameroon, Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and Uganda.
Genetic diversity at 10 microsatellite loci in Anopheles moucheti from Cameroona, DRC and Uganda.
| Cameroona | DRC | Uganda | |||||||
| Locus | Simbock (2n = 118) | Olama (2n = 112) | Nyabessan (2n = 108) | Mouloundou (2n = 108) | Kenge (2n = 22) | Tsakalakuku (2n = 128) | Bufumira (2n = 114) | All (2n = 710) | |
| AM1 | 5.99 | 6.30 | 5.35 | 6.92 | 5.87 | 4.41 | 6.46 | ||
| He | 0.805 | 0.823 | 0.805 | 0.854 | 0.853 | - | 0.662 | 0.834 | |
| Fis | +0.139 | +0.372 | - | ||||||
| AM2 | 6.06 | 6.87 | 6.0 | 6.67 | 7.75 | 2 | 4.58 | 6.75 | |
| He | 0.807 | 0.847 | 0.812 | 0.836 | 0.895 | 0.503 | 0.719 | 0.845 | |
| Fis | +0.119 | +0.186 | +0.267 | -1 | |||||
| AM5 | 8.06 | 7.22 | 8.63 | 7.37 | 5.70 | 3.39 | 5.76 | 8.87 | |
| He | 0.881 | 0.862 | 0.898 | 0.870 | 0.723 | 0.639 | 0.772 | 0.906 | |
| Fis | +0.018 | +0.069 | +0.168 | -0.027 | +0.21 | ||||
| AM6 | 7.24 | 6.40 | 7.33 | 7.13 | 3.72 | 2.69 | 7.00 | ||
| He | 0.872 | 0.826 | 0.870 | 0.850 | 0.671 | - | 0.482 | 0.847 | |
| Fis | +0.605 | - | |||||||
| AM9 | 6.54 | 6.58 | 7.80 | 5.85 | 5.38 | 2.31 | 6.63 | ||
| He | 0.762 | 0.800 | 0.875 | 0.785 | 0.745 | - | 0.201 | 0.785 | |
| Fis | -0.026 | -0.011 | +0.039 | +0.152 | - | -0.074 | |||
| AM10 | 4.28 | 4.14 | 5.49 | 4.73 | 5.00 | 1.94 | 4.31 | 4.85 | |
| He | 0.704 | 0.698 | 0.790 | 0.764 | 0.775 | 0.260 | 0.636 | 0.738 | |
| Fis | -0.065 | +0.028 | +0.110 | +0.019 | +0.205 | +0.107 | -0.159 | +0.139 | |
| AM13 | 5.93 | 6.12 | 5.49 | 6.16 | 5.37 | 1 | 4.78 | 5.92 | |
| He | 0.823 | 0.824 | 0.802 | 0.830 | 0.737 | - | 0.669 | 0.848 | |
| Fis | +0.008 | +0.042 | +0.177 | +0.077 | -0.091 | - | -0.042 | +0.292 | |
| AM15 | 7.10 | 6.85 | 8.21 | 7.17 | 6.00 | 6.13 | 1.60 | 7.85 | |
| He | 0.820 | 0.822 | 0.869 | 0.818 | 0.834 | 0.825 | 0.083 | 0.844 | |
| Fis | +0.094 | +0.049 | +0.119 | +0.263 | -0.025 | ||||
| AM16 | 5.98 | 6.69 | 6.20 | 6.37 | 6.59 | 1.45 | 3.20 | 6.39 | |
| He | 0.823 | 0.843 | 0.822 | 0.829 | 0.868 | 0.058 | 0.605 | 0.836 | |
| Fis | +0.051 | +0.101 | +0.076 | +0.076 | +0.203 | +0.327 | |||
| AM20 | 7.17 | 7.22 | 6.06 | 7.16 | 3.88 | 3.41 | 6.94 | ||
| He | 0.844 | 0.832 | 0.788 | 0.848 | 0.634 | - | 0.532 | 0.839 | |
| Fis | +0.218 | +0.066 | +0.083 | +0.130 | - | ||||
| Mean across all loci | 6.44 | 6.44 | 6.66 | 6.55 | 5.53 | 2.65 | 3.71 | 6.77 | |
| He | 0.814 | 0.818 | 0.833 | 0.830 | 0.771 | 0.228 | 0.534 | 0.689 | |
| Fis | +0.112 | +0.114 | +0.166 | +0.180 | +0.291 | -0.136 | +0.175 | ||
All: refers to populations pooled. 2n, number of chromosomes scored; Rs, allele richness [14]; He, expected heterozygosity under Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium [51]. Fis was calculated according to Weir & Cockerham [19] and goodness of fit to Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium was estimated by the exact test available in Genepop 3.2 [17]. Bolded values: P < 0.05 after taking into account multiple tests [31]. NA, No PCR product could be detected; -, irrelevant because no polymorphism was detected;NC, not computed. a Data adapted from [12].
Pairwise Fst estimates between A. moucheti populations from Cameroona, DRC and Uganda.
| Cameroona | DRC | ||||||
| Simbock | Olama | Nyabessan | Mouloundou | Kenge | Tsakalakuku | ||
| Cameroona | Simbock | ||||||
| Olama | 0.011* | ||||||
| Nyabessan | 0.014* | 0.009* | |||||
| Mouloundou | 0.028* | 0.023* | 0.017* | ||||
| DRC | Kenge | 0.049* | 0.037* | 0.040* | 0.032* | ||
| Tsakalakuku | 0.378* | 0.372* | 0.343* | 0.346* | 0.422* | ||
| Uganda | Bufumira | 0.167* | 0.172* | 0.187* | 0.168* | 0.223* | 0.448* |
*P < 0.001; DRC, Democratic Republic of Congo; a pairwise Fst estimates between Cameroon populations were already published in [12].
Figure 2Bayesian cluster analysis using STRUCTURE [22]. Graphical representation of the data set for the most likely K (K = 3), where each colour corresponds to a suggested cluster and each individual is represented by a vertical bar. The numbers in the X-axis correspond to a specific sample: 1-Simbock, 2-Olama, 3-Nyabessan, 4-Mouloundou, 5-Kenge, 6-Uganda, 7-Tsakalakuku. The Y-axis represents the probability of assignment of an individual to each cluster.
Figure 3Correlation between average Fst estimates over 10 microsatellite loci and logarithm of geographic distance between collection sites for pairwise comparisons of seven The name of each sampling site refers to comparisons involving these populations.
Long-term Ne estimates based on genetic diversity (expected heterozygosity) in each collection site, assuming microsatellite loci follow an SMM (see text).
| Collection site | He | Ne (± SD) | Neμ | RR | |
| Cameroon | Simbock | 0.814 | 42,396 ± 10,934 | 3.488 | 7.7:1 |
| Olama | 0.818 | 40,670 ± 10,651 | 3.649 | 8.1:1 | |
| Nyabessan | 0.833 | 53,046 ± 14,269 | 4.357 | 9.3:1 | |
| Mouloundou | 0.830 | 45,606 ± 12,092 | 4.20 | 9.3:1 | |
| DRC | Kenge | 0.771 | 36,901 ± 24,361 | 2.259 | 5:1 |
| Tsakalakuku | 0.228 | 5,230 ± 1,602 | 0.085 | 0.188:1 | |
| Uganda | Bufumira | 0.534 | 7,983 ± 2,316 | 0.451 | 1 |
He, unbiased heterozygosity [15]; Ne, mean effective population size calculated across all loci (± standard deviation); μ, mutation rate; RR, relative ratio of Neμ compared to the A. m. moucheti population with the smallest effective population size (Bufurima island).
Estimates of P-value for the heterozygosity tests for each population of the A. moucheti group.
| Collection site | TPM | SMM | ||||
| 70%a | 80%a | 90%a | ||||
| Cameroon | Simbock | 7 | 6 | 4 | 3 | |
| 0.360 | 0.619 | 0.192 | 0.066 | |||
| 0.322 | 0.695 | 0.625 | 0.024* | |||
| Olama | 7 | 6 | 5 | 3 | ||
| 0.377 | 0.609 | 0.396 | 0.067 | |||
| 0.275 | 1 | 0.492 | 0.084 | |||
| Nyabessan | 8 | 8 | 6 | 4 | ||
| 0.158 | 0.149 | 0.608 | 0.184 | |||
| 0.010* | 0.016* | 0.625 | 0.432 | |||
| Mouloundou | 7 | 5 | 4 | 2 | ||
| 0.362 | 0.376 | 0.183 | 0.015* | |||
| 0.557 | 0.846 | 0.275 | 0.019* | |||
| DRC | Kenge | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | |
| 0.355 | 0.395 | 0.351 | 0.376 | |||
| 0.019* | 0.105 | 0.432 | 0.557 | |||
| Tsakalakuku | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | ||
| 0.212 | 0.212 | 0.225 | 0.575 | |||
| 0.625 | 0.625 | 0.625 | 1 | |||
| Uganda | Bufurima | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | |
| 0.015* | 0.015* | 0.002** | 0.002** | |||
| 0.032 | 0.010* | 0.003** | 0.002** | |||
TPM, two-phase mutation model with a % single step mutation; SMM, stepwise mutation model.
He>Heq, number of loci with He>Heq (out of 10 loci tested in each sample, except the A. m. bervoetsi sample from Tsakalakuku where only 5 polymorphic loci were considered). * P < 0.05 and ** P < 0.01 (two tails P-values for deviation from MDE) after correction for multiple testing.