OBJECTIVES: There is evidence of a negative association between diabetes and both abdominal aortic aneurysm and aortic diameter. However, little information is available on the relation between diabetes and aortic root diameter. METHODS: We studied 109 patients with type 2 diabetes. Two-dimensional echocardiography was used to measure the aortic root at the aortic annulus, the sinus of Valsalva, the sinotubular junction and the proximal part of the ascending aorta. Measured mean values were compared with 218 age- and sex-matched patients without diabetes. A comparison of the prevalence of aortic regurgitation between the 2 groups was also performed. RESULTS: In patients with diabetes, the mean aortic root dimensions were significantly smaller than in nondiabetic patients (p < 0.05). The prevalence of aortic root dilatation was significantly higher in nondiabetic subjects than in patients with diabetes (9.63 vs. 2.75%; p = 0.025). In the multivariable regression model, diabetes was a significant negative determinant of aortic root size at all measured sites. The prevalence of aortic regurgitation tended to be higher in nondiabetic subjects than in diabetic participants (11 vs. 18.8%); however, the difference did not achieve statistical significance (p = 0.071). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with diabetes, the aortic root dimension is significantly smaller than in patients without diabetes. (c) 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel.
OBJECTIVES: There is evidence of a negative association between diabetes and both abdominal aortic aneurysm and aortic diameter. However, little information is available on the relation between diabetes and aortic root diameter. METHODS: We studied 109 patients with type 2 diabetes. Two-dimensional echocardiography was used to measure the aortic root at the aortic annulus, the sinus of Valsalva, the sinotubular junction and the proximal part of the ascending aorta. Measured mean values were compared with 218 age- and sex-matched patients without diabetes. A comparison of the prevalence of aortic regurgitation between the 2 groups was also performed. RESULTS: In patients with diabetes, the mean aortic root dimensions were significantly smaller than in nondiabetic patients (p < 0.05). The prevalence of aortic root dilatation was significantly higher in nondiabetic subjects than in patients with diabetes (9.63 vs. 2.75%; p = 0.025). In the multivariable regression model, diabetes was a significant negative determinant of aortic root size at all measured sites. The prevalence of aortic regurgitation tended to be higher in nondiabetic subjects than in diabeticparticipants (11 vs. 18.8%); however, the difference did not achieve statistical significance (p = 0.071). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with diabetes, the aortic root dimension is significantly smaller than in patients without diabetes. (c) 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel.
Authors: Rachel E Climie; Martin G Schultz; James W Fell; Lorena Romero; Petr Otahal; James E Sharman Journal: J Hum Hypertens Date: 2018-11-13 Impact factor: 3.012
Authors: Xuejuan Ning; Ning Ding; Shoshana H Ballew; Caitlin W Hicks; Josef Coresh; Elizabeth Selvin; James Pankow; Weihong Tang; Kunihiro Matsushita Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 2020-10-06 Impact factor: 5.162
Authors: Rachel E D Climie; Velandai Srikanth; Richard Beare; Laura J Keith; James Fell; Justin E Davies; James E Sharman Journal: Cardiovasc Diabetol Date: 2014-10-23 Impact factor: 9.951
Authors: Johan Ljungberg; Bengt Johansson; Karl Gunnar Engström; Elin Albertsson; Paul Holmer; Margareta Norberg; Ingvar A Bergdahl; Stefan Söderberg Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2017-05-05 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Tarik Avdic; Stefan Franzén; Moncef Zarrouk; Stefan Acosta; Peter Nilsson; Anders Gottsäter; Ann-Marie Svensson; Soffia Gudbjörnsdottir; Björn Eliasson Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2018-01-24 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Julio A Chirinos; Patrick Segers; Thierry C Gillebert; Marc L De Buyzere; Caroline M Van Daele; Zubair A Khan; Umair Khawar; Dirk De Bacquer; Ernst R Rietzschel Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2013-04-22 Impact factor: 19.112