Literature DB >> 18599513

Structure-based function prediction: approaches and applications.

Pier Federico Gherardini1, Manuela Helmer-Citterich.   

Abstract

The ever increasing number of protein structures determined by structural genomic projects has spurred much interest in the development of methods for structure-based function prediction. Existing methods can be roughly classified in two groups: some use a comparative approach looking for the presence of structural motifs possibly associated with a known biochemical function. Other methods try to identify functional patches on the surface of a protein using only its physicochemical characteristics. This review will cover both kinds of approaches to structure-based function prediction as well as their use in real-world cases. The main issues and limitations in using protein structure to predict function will also be discussed. These are mainly: the assessment of the statistical significance of structural similarities and the extent to which these methods depend on the accuracy and availability of structural data.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18599513     DOI: 10.1093/bfgp/eln030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic        ISSN: 1473-9550


  39 in total

1.  Structure- and sequence-based function prediction for non-homologous proteins.

Authors:  Lee Sael; Meghana Chitale; Daisuke Kihara
Journal:  J Struct Funct Genomics       Date:  2012-01-22

2.  Identification of family-specific residue packing motifs and their use for structure-based protein function prediction: I. Method development.

Authors:  Deepak Bandyopadhyay; Jun Huan; Jan Prins; Jack Snoeyink; Wei Wang; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2009-06-20       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Comparison of structure-based and threading-based approaches to protein functional annotation.

Authors:  Michal Brylinski; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2010-01

4.  Assessment of ligand-binding residue predictions in CASP9.

Authors:  Tobias Schmidt; Jürgen Haas; Tiziano Gallo Cassarino; Torsten Schwede
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2011-10-11

5.  The PFP and ESG protein function prediction methods in 2014: effect of database updates and ensemble approaches.

Authors:  Ishita K Khan; Qing Wei; Samuel Chapman; Dukka B Kc; Daisuke Kihara
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 6.524

6.  Automatic prediction of catalytic residues by modeling residue structural neighborhood.

Authors:  Elisa Cilia; Andrea Passerini
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  3DLigandSite: predicting ligand-binding sites using similar structures.

Authors:  Mark N Wass; Lawrence A Kelley; Michael J E Sternberg
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-05-31       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  The LabelHash algorithm for substructure matching.

Authors:  Mark Moll; Drew H Bryant; Lydia E Kavraki
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  CMASA: an accurate algorithm for detecting local protein structural similarity and its application to enzyme catalytic site annotation.

Authors:  Gong-Hua Li; Jing-Fei Huang
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Structural motifs recurring in different folds recognize the same ligand fragments.

Authors:  Gabriele Ausiello; Pier Federico Gherardini; Elena Gatti; Ottaviano Incani; Manuela Helmer-Citterich
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.