Literature DB >> 18599317

Effects of spatial transformation on regional brain volume estimates.

John S Allen1, Joel Bruss, Sonya Mehta, Thomas Grabowski, C Kice Brown, Hanna Damasio.   

Abstract

Spatial transformation of MR brain images is a standard tool used in automated anatomical parcellation and other quantitative and qualitative methods to assess brain tissue volume, composition, and distribution. Despite widespread use, the quantitative effects of spatial transformation on regional brain volume estimates have been little studied. We report on the effects of transformation on regional brain volumes of 38 (17M, 21F) manually parcellated brains. After tracing in native space, regions of interest were transformed using a classic piecewise-linear Talairach transformation (Tal) or a nonlinear registration (AIR 5th order nonlinear algorithm, 158 parameters) to one of three Talairach-based templates: 1) Tal50, constructed from 50 Talairach-transformed normal brains, 2) the MNI 305 atlas, 3) IA38, constructed from MNI305-transformed scans of the 38 subjects used in this study. Native volumes were compared to the transformed volumes. We found that: 1) significant group-level differences can be obtained in transformed data sets that are in the opposite direction of effects obtained in native space; 2) the effects of transformation are heterogeneous across brain regions, even after covarying for total brain volume and age; 3) volumetric intra-class correlations between native and transformed brains differ by registration method and template choice, region, and tissue type; and 4) transformed brains produced hippocampus and corpus callosum volume proportions that were significantly different from those obtained in native space. Our results suggest that region-based volumetric differences uncovered by spatial-transformation-based methods should be replicated in native-space brains, and that meta-analyses should take into account whether volumes are determined using spatially-transformed images and/or specific automated methods.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18599317      PMCID: PMC2581899          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.05.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  48 in total

1.  Creation and use of a Talairach-compatible atlas for accurate, automated, nonlinear intersubject registration, and analysis of functional imaging data.

Authors:  R P Woods; M Dapretto; N L Sicotte; A W Toga; J C Mazziotta
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Whole brain segmentation: automated labeling of neuroanatomical structures in the human brain.

Authors:  Bruce Fischl; David H Salat; Evelina Busa; Marilyn Albert; Megan Dieterich; Christian Haselgrove; Andre van der Kouwe; Ron Killiany; David Kennedy; Shuna Klaveness; Albert Montillo; Nikos Makris; Bruce Rosen; Anders M Dale
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2002-01-31       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Evaluation of voxel-based morphometry for focal lesion detection in individuals.

Authors:  Sonya Mehta; Thomas J Grabowski; Yogi Trivedi; Hanna Damasio
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  The morphometry of auditory cortex in the congenitally deaf measured using MRI.

Authors:  Virginia B Penhune; Roxana Cismaru; Raquel Dorsaint-Pierre; Laura Ann Petitto; Robert J Zatorre
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Why voxel-based morphometric analysis should be used with great caution when characterizing group differences.

Authors:  Christos Davatzikos
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 6.  Does bigger mean better? Evolutionary determinants of brain size and structure.

Authors:  F Aboitiz
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 1.808

7.  A stereotactic method of anatomical localization for positron emission tomography.

Authors:  P T Fox; J S Perlmutter; M E Raichle
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1985 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.826

8.  Automated Talairach atlas-based parcellation and measurement of cerebral lobes in children.

Authors:  W R Kates; I S Warsofsky; A Patwardhan; M T Abrams; A M Liu; S Naidu; W E Kaufmann; A L Reiss
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  1999-07-30       Impact factor: 3.222

Review 9.  The relationship between brain structure and neurocognition in schizophrenia: a selective review.

Authors:  Elena Antonova; Tonmoy Sharma; Robin Morris; Veena Kumari
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2004-10-01       Impact factor: 4.939

10.  Human cerebral cortex: localization, parcellation, and morphometry with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  J Rademacher; A M Galaburda; D N Kennedy; P A Filipek; V S Caviness
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  20 in total

1.  Diffusion tensor-based regional gray matter tissue segmentation using the international consortium for brain mapping atlases.

Authors:  Khader M Hasan; Richard E Frye
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Predicting behavioral deficits in pediatric traumatic brain injury through uncinate fasciculus integrity.

Authors:  Chad P Johnson; Jenifer Juranek; Larry A Kramer; Mary R Prasad; Paul R Swank; Linda Ewing-Cobbs
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.892

3.  A questionable gold standard for hippocampus volume and asymmetry.

Authors:  Khader M Hasan
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Gray matter deficits, mismatch negativity, and outcomes in schizophrenia.

Authors:  P E Rasser; U Schall; J Todd; P T Michie; P B Ward; P Johnston; K Helmbold; V Case; A Søyland; P A Tooney; P M Thompson
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2009-06-26       Impact factor: 9.306

5.  Evaluation of volume-based and surface-based brain image registration methods.

Authors:  Arno Klein; Satrajit S Ghosh; Brian Avants; B T T Yeo; Bruce Fischl; Babak Ardekani; James C Gee; J J Mann; Ramin V Parsey
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Hippocampal shape deformation in female patients with unremitting major depressive disorder.

Authors:  W S Tae; S S Kim; K U Lee; E C Nam; J W Choi; J I Park
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Ventral aspect of the visual form pathway is not critical for the perception of biological motion.

Authors:  Sharon Gilaie-Dotan; Ayse Pinar Saygin; Lauren J Lorenzi; Geraint Rees; Marlene Behrmann
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  A Spatial Registration Toolbox for Structural MR Imaging of the Aging Brain.

Authors:  Marco Ganzetti; Quanying Liu; Dante Mantini
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2018-04

9.  Diffusion tensor tractography quantification of the human corpus callosum fiber pathways across the lifespan.

Authors:  Khader M Hasan; Arash Kamali; Amal Iftikhar; Larry A Kramer; Andrew C Papanicolaou; Jack M Fletcher; Linda Ewing-Cobbs
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Improving the reliability of manual and automated methods for hippocampal and amygdala volume measurements.

Authors:  Khader M Hasan; Otto Pedraza
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.