Literature DB >> 18597953

Multicenter analysis of effect of high biologic effective dose on biochemical failure and survival outcomes in patients with Gleason score 7-10 prostate cancer treated with permanent prostate brachytherapy.

Nelson N Stone1, Louis Potters, Brian J Davis, Jay P Ciezki, Michael J Zelefsky, Mack Roach, Katsuto Shinohara, Paul A Fearn, Michael W Kattan, Richard G Stock.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the biochemical control rates and survival for Gleason score 7-10 prostate cancer patients undergoing permanent prostate brachytherapy as a function of the biologic effective dose (BED). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Six centers provided data on 5,889 permanent prostate brachytherapy patients, of whom 1,078 had Gleason score 7 (n = 845) or Gleason score 8-10 (n = 233) prostate cancer and postimplant dosimetry results available. The median prostate-specific antigen level was 7.5 ng/mL (range, 0.4-300). The median follow-up for censored patients was 46 months (range, 5-130). Short-term hormonal therapy (median duration, 3.9 months) was used in 666 patients (61.8%) and supplemental external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in 620 (57.5%). The patients were stratified into three BED groups: <200 Gy (n = 645), 200-220 Gy (n = 199), and >220 Gy (n = 234). Biochemical freedom from failure (bFFF) was determined using the Phoenix definition.
RESULTS: The 5-year bFFF rate was 80%. The bFFF rate stratified by the three BED groups was 76.4%, 83.5%, and 88.3% (p < 0.001), respectively. Cox regression analysis revealed Gleason score, prostate-specific antigen level, use of hormonal therapy, EBRT, and BED were associated with bFFF (p < 0.001). Freedom from metastasis improved from 92% to 99% with the greatest doses. The overall survival rate at 5 years for the three BED groups for Gleason score 8-10 cancer was 86.6%, 89.4%, and 94.6%, respectively (p = 0.048).
CONCLUSION: These data suggest that permanent prostate brachytherapy combined with EBRT and hormonal therapy yields excellent bFFF and survival results in Gleason score 7-10 patients when the delivered BEDs are >220 Gy. These doses can be achieved by a combination of 45-Gy EBRT with a minimal dose received by 90% of the target volume of 120 Gy of (103)Pd or 130 Gy of (125)I.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18597953     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.04.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  27 in total

1.  Treatment of localised prostate cancer with radiation therapy: evidence versus opinion.

Authors:  Ferran Guedea; Alfredo Ramos; Ismael Herruzo; José Antonio Sánchez Calzado; Jorge Contreras; Jesús Romero; Jordi Craven-Bartle; Patricia Willisch; José Luis López Torrecilla; Xavier Maldonado; Gemma Sancho; Almudena Zapatero; Montserrat Ferrer; Yolanda Pardo; Pablo Fernández; Alfonso Mariño; Asunción Hervás; Víctor Macís; Ana Boladeras; Ferran Ferrer; Brian J Davis
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.405

2.  Evidence-based guideline recommendations on low-dose rate brachytherapy in patients with low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  George Rodrigues; Xiaomei Yao; D Andrew Loblaw; Michael Brundage; Joseph L Chin
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 3.  The evolution of brachytherapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Nicholas G Zaorsky; Brian J Davis; Paul L Nguyen; Timothy N Showalter; Peter J Hoskin; Yasuo Yoshioka; Gerard C Morton; Eric M Horwitz
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  Significant association of brachytherapy boost with reduced prostate cancer-specific mortality in contemporary patients with localized, unfavorable-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Michael Xiang; Paul L Nguyen
Journal:  Brachytherapy       Date:  2015-10-17       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  The effectiveness of high-dose-rate brachytherapy with external beam radiotherapy for clinically locally advanced and node-positive prostate cancer: long-term results of a retrospective study.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Makino; Takayuki Sakurai; Shigeyuki Takamatsu; Hiroaki Iwamoto; Hiroshi Yaegashi; Masashi Iijima; Shohei Kawaguchi; Takahiro Nohara; Kazuyoshi Shigehara; Kouji Izumi; Yoshifumi Kadono; Atsushi Mizokami
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Expression of Ku70 predicts results of radiotherapy in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Tomokazu Hasegawa; Masanori Someya; Masakazu Hori; Yoshihisa Matsumoto; Kensei Nakata; Masanori Nojima; Mio Kitagawa; Takaaki Tsuchiya; Naoya Masumori; Tadashi Hasegawa; Koh-Ichi Sakata
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 7.  Radiation therapy approaches to the treatment of high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Manish A Vira; Louis Potters
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 8.  Treatment strategies for high-risk locally advanced prostate cancer.

Authors:  Seth A Rosenthal; Howard M Sandler
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 14.432

9.  Nationwide Japanese Prostate Cancer Outcome Study of Permanent Iodine-125 Seed Implantation (J-POPS): first analysis on survival.

Authors:  Kazuto Ito; Shiro Saito; Atsunori Yorozu; Shinsuke Kojima; Takashi Kikuchi; Satoshi Higashide; Manabu Aoki; Hirofumi Koga; Takefumi Satoh; Toshio Ohashi; Katsumasa Nakamura; Norihisa Katayama; Nobumichi Tanaka; Masahiro Nakano; Naoyuki Shigematsu; Takushi Dokiya; Masanori Fukushima
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  Risk factors for rectal bleeding associated with I-125 brachytherapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Kosaku Harada; Hitoshi Ishikawa; Yoshitaka Saito; Soken Nakamoto; Hidemasa Kawamura; Masaru Wakatsuki; Toru Etsunaga; Yutaka Takezawa; Mikio Kobayashi; Takashi Nakano
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 2.724

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.