Literature DB >> 18597612

Ultrashort sintered porous-surfaced dental implants used to replace posterior teeth.

Douglas Deporter1, Bunnai Ogiso, Dong-Seok Sohn, Kevin Ruljancich, Michael Pharoah.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This retrospective multicenter report provides data from a case series of partially edentulous subjects treated with an ultrashort (5-mm-long) sintered porous-surfaced (SPS) dental implant.
METHODS: The implant used had a tapered truncated cone shape, was 5-mm long, and had a maximal coronal diameter of 5 mm. Twenty-six implants were placed in 20 subjects to replace primarily maxillary and mandibular molar teeth. Submerged primary healing was used. Nine implants were restored with single crowns, one carried a single cantilever, and the remaining 16 implants were part of fixed implant-supported bridges, generally as the most distal abutment.
RESULTS: After functional periods of 1 to 8 years, two maxillary implants failed, giving maxillary and mandibular failure rates of 14.3% and 0%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The results of this case series suggest that an SPS, press-fit, tapered dental implant with a length of 5 mm and a maximal coronal diameter of 5 mm should be investigated further as a solution for the management of highly resorbed posterior sites in partial edentulism, particularly in the mandible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18597612     DOI: 10.1902/jop.2008.070496

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Periodontol        ISSN: 0022-3492            Impact factor:   6.993


  8 in total

Review 1.  Short Implants versus Longer Implants with Sinus Floor Elevation: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials with a Post-Loading Follow-Up Duration of 5 Years.

Authors:  Miaozhen Wang; Feng Liu; Christian Ulm; Huidan Shen; Xiaohui Rausch-Fan
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 3.748

2.  Effect of macro-design in the primary stability of short and extra-short implants using resonance frequency analysis. An ex vivo study.

Authors:  Ramón Silva; Pablo Villalón; Felipe Cáceres
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2020-08-29

3.  Analysis of micromovements and peri-implant stresses and strains around ultra-short implants - A three-dimensional finite-element method study.

Authors:  Nida Sumra; Shrikar Desai; Rohit Kulshrestha; Khusbhu Mishra; Raahat Vikram Singh; Prachi Gaonkar
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2021-07-01

Review 4.  Short dental implants in reduced alveolar bone height: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Marcin Tutak; Tomasz Smektała; Katarzyna Schneider; Edyta Gołębiewska; Katarzyna Sporniak-Tutak
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2013-11-21

Review 5.  Influence of implant location on the clinical outcomes of implant abutments: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Amr G ElHoussiney; He Zhang; Jinlin Song; Ping Ji; Lu Wang; Sheng Yang
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2018-02-26

6.  An In Vitro Evaluation, on Polyurethane Foam Sheets, of the Insertion Torque (IT) Values, Pull-Out Torque Values, and Resonance Frequency Analysis (RFA) of NanoShort Dental Implants.

Authors:  Luca Comuzzi; Giovanna Iezzi; Adriano Piattelli; Margherita Tumedei
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 4.329

7.  Short implants (≤6 mm) versus longer implants with sinus floor elevation in atrophic posterior maxilla: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Qi Yan; Xinyu Wu; Meiying Su; Fang Hua; Bin Shi
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Survival rates of ultra-short (<6 mm) compared with short locking-taper implants supporting single crowns in posterior areas: A 5-year retrospective study.

Authors:  Giorgio Lombardo; Annarita Signoriello; Mauro Marincola; Pietro Liboni; Estevam A Bonfante; Pier F Nocini
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 4.259

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.