Literature DB >> 18597212

[HIV testing after needlestick injury: must the index patient be informed?].

S Wicker1, R Gottschalk, A Spickhoff, H F Rabenau.   

Abstract

As a current case of needlestick injury (NSI) has demonstrated, it is obvious that in clinical practice there is often uncertainty about the procedure if the index patient refuses a blood test or is not able to give his/her consent. The question about the legality of implementing HBV, HCV and HIV testing after NSI is commented on from different points of view: occupational medicine, infection control, virology and the legal system. The testing of the index patient - without his/her consent - seems to be appropriate. The protection of health care workers should be given priority over the right of the index patient "not wanting to know" about his/her infection status.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18597212     DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1081101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dtsch Med Wochenschr        ISSN: 0012-0472            Impact factor:   0.628


  3 in total

1.  In reply.

Authors:  Sabine Wicker; Ingo Marzi
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  [Occupational exposure to blood in multiple trauma care].

Authors:  S Wicker; S Wutzler; A Schachtrupp; K Zacharowski; B Scheller
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  Best practice for needlestick injuries.

Authors:  S Wicker; F Walcher; S Wutzler; C Stephan; I Marzi
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 3.693

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.