Literature DB >> 18596720

Can an electronic device with a single cuff be accurate in a wide range of arm size? Validation of the Visomat Comfort 20/40 device for home blood pressure monitoring.

G S Stergiou1, D Tzamouranis, E G Nasothimiou, A D Protogerou.   

Abstract

An appropriate cuff according to the individual's arm circumference is recommended with all blood pressure (BP) monitors. An electronic device for home monitoring has been developed (Visomat Comfort 20/40) that estimates the individual's arm circumference by measuring the cuff filing volume and makes an adjustment of measured BP taking into account the estimated arm circumference. Thus the manufacturer recommends the use of a single cuff for arm circumference 23-43 cm. The device accuracy was assessed using the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol. Simultaneous BP measurements were obtained in 33 adults by two observers (connected mercury sphygmomanometers) four times, sequentially with three measurements taken using the tested device. Absolute device-observer BP differences were classified into < or =5, < or =10 and < or =15 mm Hg zones. For each participant the number of measurements with a difference < or =5 mm Hg was calculated. The device produced 60/89/97 measurements within 5/10/15 mm Hg respectively for systolic BP, and 72/97/98 for diastolic. Twenty-three subjects had at least two of their systolic BP differences < or =5 mm Hg and three had no differences < or =5 mm Hg (for diastolic 27 and 1, respectively). Mean device-observer BP difference (systolic/diastolic) was 3.7 +/- 5.6/-1.5 +/- 4.7 mm Hg (4.7 +/- 4.9/ - 1.7 +/- 4.3 in arm circumference 23-29 cm [39 readings] and 3.1 +/- 5.9/-1.4 +/- 5.0 in arm 30-34 cm [60 readings], P=NS). In conclusion, the device fulfils the International Protocol requirements and can be recommended for clinical use. Interestingly, the device was accurate using a single cuff in a wide range of arm circumference (23-34 cm). This study provides no information about the device accuracy in larger arms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18596720     DOI: 10.1038/jhh.2008.70

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Hypertens        ISSN: 0950-9240            Impact factor:   3.012


  4 in total

1.  Evaluation of the Omron MX3 Plus monitor for blood pressure measurement in adolescents.

Authors:  Diego Giulliano Destro Christofaro; Juliano Casonatto; Marcos Doederlein Polito; Jefferson Rosa Cardoso; Rômulo Fernandes; Débora Alves Guariglia; Aline Mendes Gerage; Arli Ramos de Oliveira
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 3.183

Review 2.  Techniques for self-measurement of blood pressure: limitations and needs for future research.

Authors:  Paolo Palatini; Gerhard N Frick
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2012-01-23       Impact factor: 3.738

3.  A Call to Regulate Manufacture and Marketing of Blood Pressure Devices and Cuffs: A Position Statement From the World Hypertension League, International Society of Hypertension and Supporting Hypertension Organizations.

Authors:  Norm R C Campbell; Mark Gelfer; George S Stergiou; Bruce S Alpert; Martin G Myers; Michael K Rakotz; Raj Padwal; Aletta Elisabeth Schutte; Eoin O'Brien; Daniel T Lackland; Mark L Niebylski; Peter M Nilsson; Kimbree A Redburn; Xin-Hua Zhang; Louise Burrell; Masatsugu Horiuchi; Neil R Poulter; Dorairaj Prabhakaran; Agustin J Ramirez; Ernesto L Schiffrin; Rhian M Touyz; Ji-Guang Wang; Michael A Weber
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 3.738

4.  Cuff challenges in blood pressure measurement.

Authors:  Paolo Palatini; Roland Asmar
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 3.738

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.