| Literature DB >> 18596649 |
Francesco P Ballistreri1, Ugo Chiacchio, Antonio Rescifina, Gaetano Tomaselli, Rosa M Toscano.
Abstract
Aromatic and aliphatic oximes have been deoximated inEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18596649 PMCID: PMC6244949 DOI: 10.3390/molecules13061230
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Deoximation of aldoximes 1 by oxidation with diluted hydrogen peroxide and PCWP a
| Oxime | R1 | R2 | Time (min.) | Conversion (%) | Yield (%)b,c |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| C6H5 | H | 80 | 90 | 100 |
|
| H | 70 | 95 | 100 | |
|
| C6H5 | CH3 | 90 | 80 | 95 |
|
| CH(Me)(Et) | H | 60 | 95 | 70 |
|
| H | 60 | 95 | 70 | |
|
| –(C5H10)– | 90 | 85 | 93 | |
a All the reactions have been performed in CHCl3/H2O at 30 °C employing [Oximes] = 2.5 mmol; [H2O2] = 20 mmol and [PCWP] = 0.025 mmol. b Isolated yields. c Identities of compounds have been confirmed by comparison of their MS and 1H-NMR spectra with those of authentic samples.
Scheme 1Preparation of isoxazole and isoxazoline derivatives by aldoximes oxidation in the presence of alkenes or alkynes a.
| Entry | R1 | R2 | R3 | R4 | Time (h) | Conv. (%) | Yields, (%)b,c | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 5 | 6 | 7 | |||||||
| 1 | C6H5 | H | CH3(CH2)5 | 9 | 84 | 62 | 17 | |||
| 2 | CH(Me)(Et) | H | CH3(CH2)5 | 5 | 89 | 56 | 6 | |||
| 3 | C6H5d | CO2Me | CO2Me | 9 | 81 | 43 | 46 | |||
| 4 | CH(Me)(Et)e | CO2Me | CO2Me | 6 | 100 | 30 | 30 | |||
| 5 | C6H5 | C6H5 | 16 | 71 | 67 | 28 | ||||
| 6 | CH(Me)(Et) | C6H5 | 6.5 | 90 | 49 | 9 | ||||
| 7 | C6H5 | CH3(CH2)5 | 6.5 | 83 | 49 | 32 | ||||
| 8 | CH(Me)(Et) | CH3(CH2)5 | 3 | 88 | 33 | 5 | ||||
| 9 | C6H5 | CO2Me | 8 | 86 | 30 | 42 | 13 | |||
| 10 | CH(Me)(Et) | CO2Me | 3 | 100 | 43 | 25 | 8 | |||
aAll the reactions have been performed in CHCl3/H2O at 40 °C employing [Oximes] = 2.5 mmol; [H2O2] = 20 mmol and [PCWP] = 0.025 mmol. b Isolated yields. c Identities of the compounds have been obtained comparing their MS and 1H-NMR spectra with those of authentic samples. dThe reaction is stereospecific; fumarate gave E-adduct whereas maleate gave Z-adduct. eThe reaction has been performed with fumarate.
Scheme 2