Literature DB >> 18596641

Development of a large-item environmental sound test and the effects of short-term training with spectrally-degraded stimuli.

Valeriy Shafiro1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Accurate identification of environmental sounds plays an important role in maintaining listeners' awareness of their environment, and is a major concern for cochlear implant patients. Although research indicates that decreased spectral resolution has a negative effect on environmental sound identification, little is known about the processes underlying perceptual adaptation to spectrally-degraded input. The goals of this study were (1) to develop a test of environmental sound perception containing a large variety of easily identifiable and familiar sound sources, represented by multiple exemplars, and (2) to examine whether auditory training improves listeners' identification of spectrally-degraded environmental sounds.
DESIGN: In experiment 1, familiarity ratings and identification accuracy were obtained for 21 normal-hearing subjects for 48 environmental sound sources; there were 4 exemplars of each sound source, for a total of 192 stimuli. A second test was developed using a subset of 40 sound sources (4 exemplars each, for a total of 160 stimuli). In experiment 2, seven normal-hearing subjects (who did not participate in experiment 1) were asked to identify spectrally-degraded environmental sounds processed by a four-channel noise-band vocoder. The second stimulus set developed in experiment 1 (40 sound sources, 4 exemplars each) was used in experiment 2. The subjects were tested in a pretest-posttest design with five training sessions between the pretest and the posttest. The training sounds were selected individually for each subject, and comprised one half of the sound sources that were misidentified in the pretest. Each sound source used in training was represented by two exemplars. During training, subjects received trial and block feedback. For each incorrect response, subjects were allowed to replay the stimulus up to five times after being shown the correct response.
RESULTS: In experiment 1, listeners' average identification accuracy was 95% correct, with 178 of all sounds identified with an accuracy of 80% or more. The average identification accuracy of the 160 sounds selected for experiment 2 was 98% correct, and their average familiarity rating was 6.39 (on a 7-point scale). In experiment 2, the average identification accuracy of spectrally-degraded sounds was 33% correct on the pretest. However, after training, average identification accuracy across all sounds improved to 63% correct on the posttest. The largest improvement (86 percentage points) was obtained for the sound exemplars used during training. The identification accuracy for alternative exemplars of the training sounds (that referenced the same sources) improved by 36 percentage points. Finally, the identification of sound sources not included in the training, but perceived with equal difficulty on the pretest, improved by 18 percentage points.
CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate positive effects of training on the identification of spectrally-degraded environmental sounds and suggest that training effects can generalize to other sound exemplars and sources, although with a reduced magnitude of improvement. The findings also indicate a timeline for initial perceptual adaptation to spectrally-degraded environmental sounds, and provide a preliminary basis for incorporating environmental sounds into auditory rehabilitation programs for cochlear implant patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18596641     DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31817e08ea

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  18 in total

1.  Relating quality of life to outcomes and predictors in adult cochlear implant users: Are we measuring the right things?

Authors:  Aaron C Moberly; Michael S Harris; Lauren Boyce; Kara Vasil; Taylor Wucinich; David B Pisoni; Jodi Baxter; Christin Ray; Valeriy Shafiro
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  The Relationship Between Environmental Sound Awareness and Speech Recognition Skills in Experienced Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Michael S Harris; Lauren Boyce; David B Pisoni; Valeriy Shafiro; Aaron C Moberly
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.311

3.  Environmental sound training in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Valeriy Shafiro; Stanley Sheft; Sejal Kuvadia; Brian Gygi
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  The influence of environmental sound training on the perception of spectrally degraded speech and environmental sounds.

Authors:  Valeriy Shafiro; Stanley Sheft; Brian Gygi; Kim Thien N Ho
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2012-08-12

5.  Initial development of a spatially separated speech-in-noise and localization training program.

Authors:  Richard S Tyler; Shelley A Witt; Camille C Dunn; Wenjun Wang
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.664

Review 6.  Cochlear implants and spoken language processing abilities: review and assessment of the literature.

Authors:  Nathaniel R Peterson; David B Pisoni; Richard T Miyamoto
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.406

7.  Perception of environmental sounds by experienced cochlear implant patients.

Authors:  Valeriy Shafiro; Brian Gygi; Min-Yu Cheng; Jay Vachhani; Megan Mulvey
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Transfer of auditory perceptual learning with spectrally reduced speech to speech and nonspeech tasks: implications for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Jeremy L Loebach; David B Pisoni; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Environmental Sound Awareness in Experienced Cochlear Implant Users and Cochlear Implant Candidates.

Authors:  Kevin R McMahon; Aaron C Moberly; Valeriy Shafiro; Michael S Harris
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  How Does Quality of Life Relate to Auditory Abilities? A Subitem Analysis of the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire.

Authors:  Kara J Vasil; Jessica Lewis; Terrin Tamati; Christin Ray; Aaron C Moberly
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 1.664

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.