Literature DB >> 18596638

S100B as an additional prognostic marker in subarachnoid aneurysmal hemorrhage.

Paola Sanchez-Peña1, Ana-Rosa Pereira, Nader-Antoine Sourour, Alessandra Biondi, Lise Lejean, Chantal Colonne, Anne-Laure Boch, Mossab Al Hawari, Lamine Abdennour, Louis Puybasset.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Studies of new neuroprotective approaches in patients with subarachnoid aneurysmal hemorrhage and better family information would benefit from the development of laboratory markers of brain ischemia. The goal of this study was to evaluate mean 15-day S100B for predicting outcomes after subarachnoid aneurysmal hemorrhage.
DESIGN: Single center prospective cohort with consecutive inclusions.
SETTING: Anesthesiology and Critical Care Neurosurgical Unit of a university hospital. PATIENTS: One hundred nine patients admitted within 48 hrs after subarachnoid aneurysmal hemorrhage onset and treated by surgical clipping or coiling within 48 hrs following admission.
INTERVENTIONS: We recorded initial World Federation of Neurologic Surgeons and Fisher grades; comorbidities; initial severity; aneurysm location; presence of acute hydrocephalus; presence of intraventricular hemorrhage; initial seizures and neurogenic lung edema; initial troponin values; treatment of aneurysm; and occurrence of vasospasm.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: S100B was assayed daily over the first 15 days. Glasgow Outcome Scores were recorded at intensive care unit discharge and after 6 and 12 months. The main outcome criterion was the 12-month Glasgow Outcome Scale score dichotomized as poor (Glasgow Outcome Scale 1-3) or good (Glasgow Outcome Scale 4-5). Seventy percent of patients had good 12-month outcome. Poor outcome was associated with higher initial World Federation of Neurologic Surgeons and Fisher scores, neurogenic lung edema, high mean 15-day S100B but not initial, troponin initial value, intraventricular hemorrhage, angiographically documented vasospasm, all in an univariate manner. After multivariate analysis, only mean 15-day S100B value significantly predicted outcome (p < 0.0005). The best cutoff for the mean 15-day S100B value was 0.23 microg/L (specificity 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.81-0.95; sensitivity 0.91, 95% CI 0.75-0.98; area under the curve 0.98, 95% CI 0.87-0.99).
CONCLUSION: S100B elevation over the first 15 days after subarachnoid aneurysmal hemorrhage is associated with poor outcome after subarachnoid aneurysmal hemorrhage. This result supports the use of S100B as a surrogate marker for brain ischemia in patients with subarachnoid aneurysmal hemorrhage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18596638     DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181809750

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  27 in total

1.  Neurofilament light chain levels in ventricular cerebrospinal fluid after acute aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage.

Authors:  E R Zanier; D Refai; G J Zipfel; T Zoerle; L Longhi; T J Esparza; M L Spinner; R J Bateman; D L Brody; N Stocchetti
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 10.154

2.  Modern Approach to SAH in Intensive Care Unit (ICU).

Authors:  N Bruder; L Velly; J L Codaccioni
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-10-09       Impact factor: 1.610

3.  Effect of magnesium sulfate therapy on patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage using serum S100B protein as a prognostic marker.

Authors:  Tamer Hassan; Mahmoud Nassar; Sherif Mohammed Elhadi; Wafa Kamel Radi
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 3.042

4.  Neuron Specific Enolase, S100-beta protein and progranulin as diagnostic biomarkers of status epilepticus.

Authors:  Aurélie Hanin; Jérôme Alexandre Denis; Valerio Frazzini; Louis Cousyn; Françoise Imbert-Bismut; Benoit Rucheton; Dominique Bonnefont-Rousselot; Clémence Marois; Virginie Lambrecq; Sophie Demeret; Vincent Navarro
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 4.849

5.  A multiparameter panel method for outcome prediction following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Authors:  Natacha Turck; Laszlo Vutskits; Paola Sanchez-Pena; Xavier Robin; Alexandre Hainard; Marianne Gex-Fabry; Catherine Fouda; Hadiji Bassem; Markus Mueller; Frédérique Lisacek; Louis Puybasset; Jean-Charles Sanchez
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  High S100B levels in cerebrospinal fluid and peripheral blood of patients with acute basal ganglial hemorrhage are associated with poor outcome.

Authors:  Man Huang; Xiao-Qiao Dong; Yue-Yu Hu; Wen-Hua Yu; Zu-Yong Zhang
Journal:  World J Emerg Med       Date:  2010

Review 7.  Biomarkers as outcome predictors in subarachnoid hemorrhage--a systematic review.

Authors:  Caron M Hong; Cigdem Tosun; David B Kurland; Volodymyr Gerzanich; David Schreibman; J Marc Simard
Journal:  Biomarkers       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 2.658

8.  S100B and brain natriuretic peptide predict functional neurological outcome after intracerebral haemorrhage.

Authors:  Michael L James; Robert Blessing; Barbara G Phillips-Bute; Ellen Bennett; Daniel T Laskowitz
Journal:  Biomarkers       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.658

9.  Biomarkers of Neurological Outcome After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage as Early Predictors at Discharge from an Intensive Care Unit.

Authors:  Jaroslaw Kedziora; Malgorzata Burzynska; Waldemar Gozdzik; Andrzej Kübler; Katarzyna Kobylinska; Barbara Adamik
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 3.210

10.  Effect of remote ischemic preconditioning on cerebral vasospasm, biomarkers of cerebral ischemia, and functional outcomes in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (ERVAS): A randomized controlled pilot trial.

Authors:  R P Sangeetha; Ramesh J Venkatapura; Sriganesh Kamath; Rita Christopher; Dhananjaya Ishwar Bhat; H R Arvinda; Dhritiman Chakrabarti
Journal:  Brain Circ       Date:  2021-05-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.