Literature DB >> 18595286

Generating variable and random schedules of reinforcement using Microsoft Excel macros.

Stacie L Bancroft1, Jason C Bourret.   

Abstract

Variable reinforcement schedules are used to arrange the availability of reinforcement following varying response ratios or intervals of time. Random reinforcement schedules are subtypes of variable reinforcement schedules that can be used to arrange the availability of reinforcement at a constant probability across number of responses or time. Generating schedule values for variable and random reinforcement schedules can be difficult. The present article describes the steps necessary to write macros in Microsoft Excel that will generate variable-ratio, variable-interval, variable-time, random-ratio, random-interval, and random-time reinforcement schedule values.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18595286      PMCID: PMC2408339          DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2008.41-227

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal        ISSN: 0021-8855


  13 in total

1.  The reductive effects of noncontingent reinforcement fixed-time versus variable-time schedules.

Authors:  J E Carr; K K Kellum; I M Chong
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2001

2.  A progression for generating variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  M FLESHLER; H S HOFFMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  The effects of variable-interval reinforcement on academic engagement: a demonstration of matching theory.

Authors:  B K Martens; D G Lochner; S Q Kelly
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1992

4.  Effects of reinforcer rate and reinforcer quality on time allocation: Extensions of matching theory to educational settings.

Authors:  N A Neef
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1992

5.  Differential effects of fixed- and variable-time feedback on production rates of elementary school children.

Authors:  R W Saudargas; C H Madsen; J W Scott
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1977

6.  Reinforcing value of food in obese and non-obese women.

Authors:  B E Saelens; L H Epstein
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.868

7.  The class specific effects of compliance training with "do" and "don't" requests: analogue analysis and classroom application.

Authors:  N A Neef; M S Shafer; A L Egel; M F Cataldo; J M Parrish
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1983

8.  Probability of response and probability of reinforcement in a response-defined analogue of an interval schedule.

Authors:  J R Millenson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-03       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Effects of modeling versus instructions on sensitivity to reinforcement schedules.

Authors:  Nancy A Neef; Julie Marckel; Summer Ferreri; Sunhwa Jung; Lindsay Nist; Nancy Armstrong
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2004

10.  Effects of strategic versus tactical instructions on adaptation to changing contingencies in children with adhd.

Authors:  David E Bicard; Nancy A Neef
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2002
View more
  5 in total

1.  Random-ratio schedules produce greater demand for i.v. drug administration than fixed-ratio schedules in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Carla H Lagorio; Gail Winger
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2014-02-23       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  A procedure for thinning the schedule of time-out.

Authors:  Jeanne M Donaldson; Timothy R Vollmer
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2012

3.  A tutorial on the use of Excel 2010 and Excel for Mac 2011 for conducting delay-discounting analyses.

Authors:  Derek D Reed; Brent A Kaplan; Adam T Brewer
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2012

4.  Recording an Excel(®) Macro to Specify Date Ranges for Clinical Data.

Authors:  Neil Deochand; Mack S Costello; R Wayne Fuqua
Journal:  Behav Anal Pract       Date:  2015-08-12

5.  Assessing Mongolian gerbil emotional behavior: effects of two shock intensities and response-independent shocks during an extended inhibitory-avoidance task.

Authors:  Camilo Hurtado-Parrado; Camilo González-León; Mónica A Arias-Higuera; Angelo Cardona; Lucia G Medina; Laura García-Muñoz; Christian Sánchez; Julián Cifuentes; Juan Carlos Forigua; Andrea Ortiz; Cesar A Acevedo-Triana; Javier L Rico
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 2.984

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.