Literature DB >> 18595192

Benefit of the Vibrant Soundbridge device in patients implanted for 5 to 8 years.

Isabelle Mosnier1, Olivier Sterkers, Didier Bouccara, Samia Labassi, Jean-Pierre Bebear, Philippe Bordure, Christian Dubreuil, Thibaud Dumon, Bruno Frachet, Bernard Fraysse, Jean-Pierre Lavieille, Jacques Magnan, Christian Martin, Bernard Meyer, Michel Mondain, Didier Portmann, Alain Robier, Sébastien Schmerber, Jean-Marc Thomassin, Eric Truy, Alain Uziel, François-Michel Vanecloo, Christophe Vincent, Evelyne Ferrary.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess audiological performance, satisfaction rate, and side effects of 100 patients who have been using the middle ear implant Vibrant Soundbridge (VSB) for 5 to 8 yr when compared with data collected from 3 to 18 mo postsurgery.
DESIGN: Audiological testing and subjective evaluation using self-assessment scales were performed in 77 out of the 100 patients using the VSB for 5 to 8 years. The results were compared to data collected 3 months (audiological testing) and 18 months (self-assessment scales) after surgery. Twenty-three patients have not been evaluated for different reported reasons.
RESULTS: Pure-tone hearing thresholds decreased similarly in both implanted and contralateral ears. The satisfaction ratings and the functional gain provided by the VSB remained stable. Speech comprehension in quiet conditions without the VSB decreased from 56 to 37% in 5 to 8 yr, but an 81% score was achieved with the VSB.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the performance of the VSB does not deteriorate for more than 5 yr, without adverse effect. These results confirm the safety and the effectiveness of the VSB with a long-term follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18595192     DOI: 10.1097/aud.0b013e3181645366

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  18 in total

Review 1.  [Semi-implantable hearing aids for sensorineural hearing loss and combined hearing loss: experiences at the German Armed Forces Hospital in Ulm].

Authors:  M Tisch; H Maier
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Vibrant SoundBridge application to middle ear windows versus conventional hearing aids: a comparative study based on international outcome inventory for hearing aids.

Authors:  Ahmet Atas; Hakan Tutar; Bulent Gunduz; Yıldırım A Bayazıt
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 3.  Systematic review to evaluate the safety, efficacy and economical outcomes of the Vibrant Soundbridge for the treatment of sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Karl-Ludwig Bruchhage; Anke Leichtle; Rainer Schönweiler; Ingo Todt; Wolf-Dieter Baumgartner; Henning Frenzel; Barbara Wollenberg
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Importance of adhesiolysis in revision surgery for vibrant soundbridge device failures at the short incus process.

Authors:  Yoon Ah Park; Tae Hoon Kong; Jin Soon Chang; Young Joon Seo
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Vibrant Soundbridge middle ear implantations: experience at National University Hospital Singapore.

Authors:  Lynne Hsueh Yee Lim; Jocelynne Del Prado; Ling Xiang; Abdul Rahman Bin Yusof; Jenny Hooi Yin Loo
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 6.  Middle ear implantable hearing devices: an overview.

Authors:  David S Haynes; Jadrien A Young; George B Wanna; Michael E Glasscock
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2009-09

Review 7.  [Differential indication of active middle ear implants].

Authors:  K Braun; H-P Zenner; N Friese; A Tropitzsch
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 8.  [Fully implantable hearing systems].

Authors:  J Maurer
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.284

9.  Long-term functional outcome and satisfaction of patients with an active middle ear implant for sensorineural hearing loss compared to a matched population with conventional hearing aids.

Authors:  Friedrich Ihler; Julian Bewarder; Jenny Blum; Christoph Matthias; Martin Canis
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  Implantation of the Vibrant Soundbridge in a Case of Bilateral Malformation of the Middle and External Ear.

Authors:  Henryk Skarżyński; Łukasz Plichta; Bartłomiej Król; Katarzyna Beata Cywka; Piotr Henryk Skarżyński
Journal:  Am J Case Rep       Date:  2021-05-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.