Literature DB >> 18594956

Instruction bias and lineup presentation moderate the effects of administrator knowledge on eyewitness identification.

Sarah M Greathouse1, Margaret Bull Kovera.   

Abstract

Pairs (N=234) of witnesses and lineup administrators completed an identification task in which administrator knowledge, lineup presentation, instruction bias, and target presence were manipulated. Administrator knowledge had the greatest effect on identifications of the suspect for simultaneous photospreads paired with biased instructions, with single-blind administrations increasing identifications of the suspect. When biased instructions were given, single-blind administrations produced fewer foil identifications than double-blind administrations. Administrators exhibited a greater proportion of biasing behaviors during single-blind administrations than during double-blind administrations. The diagnosticity of identifications of the suspect in double-blind administrations was double their diagnosticity in single-blind administrations. These results suggest that when biasing factors are present to increase a witness's propensity to guess, single-blind administrator behavior influences witnesses to identify the suspect.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18594956     DOI: 10.1007/s10979-008-9136-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Law Hum Behav        ISSN: 0147-7307


  10 in total

Review 1.  Eyewitness identification evidence and innocence risk.

Authors:  Steven E Clark; Ryan D Godfrey
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-02

2.  Improving juror sensitivity to specific eyewitness factors: judicial instructions fail the test.

Authors:  Angela M Jones; Amanda N Bergold; Steven Penrod
Journal:  Psychiatr Psychol Law       Date:  2020-02-13

3.  Beliefs and expectancies in legal decision making: an introduction to the Special Issue.

Authors:  Bradley D McAuliff; Brian H Bornstein
Journal:  Psychol Crime Law       Date:  2012

Review 4.  Evolution of the empirical and theoretical foundations of eyewitness identification reform.

Authors:  Steven E Clark; Molly B Moreland; Scott D Gronlund
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-04

5.  Effects of cannabis on eyewitness memory: A field study.

Authors:  Annelies Vredeveldt; Steve D Charman; Aukje den Blanken; Maren Hooydonk
Journal:  Appl Cogn Psychol       Date:  2018-04-19

6.  Deception and Cognitive Load: Expanding Our Horizon with a Working Memory Model.

Authors:  Siegfried L Sporer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-04-07

7.  Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm.

Authors:  Josh P Davis; Andreea C Maigut; Darrick Jolliffe; Stuart J Gibson; Chris J Solomon
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 1.355

8.  Eyewitness Identification: Live, Photo, and Video Lineups.

Authors:  Ryan J Fitzgerald; Heather L Price; Tim Valentine
Journal:  Psychol Public Policy Law       Date:  2018-08

9.  The impact of sleep on eyewitness identifications.

Authors:  D P Morgan; J Tamminen; T M Seale-Carlisle; L Mickes
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 2.963

10.  Do sequential lineups impair underlying discriminability?

Authors:  Matthew Kaesler; John C Dunn; Keith Ransom; Carolyn Semmler
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2020-08-04
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.