AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: We evaluated the anti-atherosclerotic effect of the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl CoA reductase inhibitor, rosuvastatin, and the angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB), candesartan, alone and in combination, in the streptozotocin-induced diabetic apolipoprotein E-deficient (Apoe (-/-)) mouse. METHODS: Control and streptozotocin-induced diabetic Apoe (-/-) mice received rosuvastatin (5 mg kg(-1) day(-1)), candesartan (2.5 mg kg(-1) day(-1)), dual therapy or no treatment for 20 weeks. Aortic plaque deposition was assessed by Sudan IV staining and subsequent visual quantification. The abundance of proteins was measured using immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Diabetes was associated with a fourfold increase in total plaque area. Rosuvastatin attenuated plaque area in diabetic mice in the absence of lipid-lowering effects. The anti-atherosclerotic effect of rosuvastatin was comparable to that observed with candesartan. A similar beneficial effect was seen with dual therapy, although it was not superior to monotherapy. Rosuvastatin treatment was associated with attenuated accumulation of AGE and AGE receptor (RAGE) in plaques. Similar beneficial effects on markers of oxidative stress were seen with the ARB and statin. Candesartan was more effective at reducing macrophage accumulation and collagen I abundance in plaques compared with rosuvastatin. The combined effect of candesartan and rosuvastatin was superior in reducing macrophage infiltration, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 level, vascular AGE accumulation and RAGE abundance in the vascular wall. Furthermore, the combination tended to be more effective in reducing smooth muscle cell infiltration and connective tissue growth factor abundance in plaques. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: Rosuvastatin has direct anti-atherosclerotic effects in diabetic macrovascular disease. These effects are independent of effects on lipids and comparable to the effects observed with candesartan.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: We evaluated the anti-atherosclerotic effect of the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl CoA reductase inhibitor, rosuvastatin, and the angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB), candesartan, alone and in combination, in the streptozotocin-induced diabetic apolipoprotein E-deficient (Apoe (-/-)) mouse. METHODS: Control and streptozotocin-induced diabeticApoe (-/-) mice received rosuvastatin (5 mg kg(-1) day(-1)), candesartan (2.5 mg kg(-1) day(-1)), dual therapy or no treatment for 20 weeks. Aortic plaque deposition was assessed by Sudan IV staining and subsequent visual quantification. The abundance of proteins was measured using immunohistochemistry. RESULTS:Diabetes was associated with a fourfold increase in total plaque area. Rosuvastatin attenuated plaque area in diabeticmice in the absence of lipid-lowering effects. The anti-atherosclerotic effect of rosuvastatin was comparable to that observed with candesartan. A similar beneficial effect was seen with dual therapy, although it was not superior to monotherapy. Rosuvastatin treatment was associated with attenuated accumulation of AGE and AGE receptor (RAGE) in plaques. Similar beneficial effects on markers of oxidative stress were seen with the ARB and statin. Candesartan was more effective at reducing macrophage accumulation and collagen I abundance in plaques compared with rosuvastatin. The combined effect of candesartan and rosuvastatin was superior in reducing macrophage infiltration, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 level, vascular AGE accumulation and RAGE abundance in the vascular wall. Furthermore, the combination tended to be more effective in reducing smooth muscle cell infiltration and connective tissue growth factor abundance in plaques. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION:Rosuvastatin has direct anti-atherosclerotic effects in diabetic macrovascular disease. These effects are independent of effects on lipids and comparable to the effects observed with candesartan.
Authors: Henning Morawietz; Sandra Erbs; Jürgen Holtz; Andreas Schubert; Michael Krekler; Winfried Goettsch; Oliver Kuss; Volker Adams; Karsten Lenk; Friedrich W Mohr; Gerhard Schuler; Rainer Hambrecht Journal: Circulation Date: 2006-07-04 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Lars H Lindholm; Hans Ibsen; Björn Dahlöf; Richard B Devereux; Gareth Beevers; Ulf de Faire; Frej Fyhrquist; Stevo Julius; Sverre E Kjeldsen; Krister Kristiansson; Ole Lederballe-Pedersen; Markku S Nieminen; Per Omvik; Suzanne Oparil; Hans Wedel; Peter Aurup; Jonathan Edelman; Steven Snapinn Journal: Lancet Date: 2002-03-23 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: M P Wautier; O Chappey; S Corda; D M Stern; A M Schmidt; J L Wautier Journal: Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab Date: 2001-05 Impact factor: 4.310
Authors: Anthony Keech; David Colquhoun; James Best; Adrienne Kirby; R John Simes; David Hunt; Wendy Hague; Elaine Beller; Manjula Arulchelvam; Jennifer Baker; Andrew Tonkin Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Helen M Colhoun; D John Betteridge; Paul N Durrington; Graham A Hitman; H Andrew W Neil; Shona J Livingstone; Margaret J Thomason; Michael I Mackness; Valentine Charlton-Menys; John H Fuller Journal: Lancet Date: 2004 Aug 21-27 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Doris M Tham; Baby Martin-McNulty; Yi-xin Wang; Dennis W Wilson; Ronald Vergona; Mark E Sullivan; William Dole; John C Rutledge Journal: Physiol Genomics Date: 2002-10-02 Impact factor: 3.107
Authors: K A Patterson; X Zhang; S K Wrobleski; A E Hawley; D A Lawrence; T W Wakefield; D D Myers; J A Diaz Journal: Thromb Res Date: 2012-12-29 Impact factor: 3.944