Literature DB >> 18594356

True incidence of all complications following immediate and delayed breast reconstruction.

Stephen R Sullivan1, Derek R D Fletcher, Casey D Isom, F Frank Isik.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Improved self-image and psychological well-being after breast reconstruction are well documented. To determine methods that optimized results with minimal morbidity, the authors examined their results and complications based on reconstruction method and timing.
METHODS: The authors reviewed all breast reconstructions after mastectomy for breast cancer performed under the supervision of a single surgeon over a 6-year period at a tertiary referral center. Reconstruction method and timing, patient characteristics, and complication rates were reviewed.
RESULTS: Reconstruction was performed on 240 consecutive women (94 bilateral and 146 unilateral; 334 total reconstructions). Reconstruction timing was evenly split between immediate (n = 167) and delayed (n = 167). Autologous tissue (n = 192) was more common than tissue expander/implant reconstruction (n = 142), and the free deep inferior epigastric perforator was the most common free flap (n = 124). The authors found no difference in the complication incidence with autologous reconstruction, whether performed immediately or delayed. However, there was a significantly higher complication rate following immediate placement of a tissue expander when compared with delayed reconstruction (p = 0.008). Capsular contracture was a significantly more common late complication following immediate (40.4 percent) versus delayed (17.0 percent) reconstruction (p < 0.001; odds ratio, 5.2; 95 percent confidence interval, 2.3 to 11.6).
CONCLUSIONS: Autologous reconstruction can be performed immediately or delayed, with optimal aesthetic outcome and low flap loss risk. However, the overall complication and capsular contracture incidence following immediate tissue expander/implant reconstruction was much higher than when performed delayed. Thus, tissue expander placement at the time of mastectomy may not necessarily save the patient an extra operation and may compromise the final aesthetic outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18594356     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181774267

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  30 in total

1.  Complications in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: One-year Outcomes of the Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium (MROC) Study.

Authors:  Edwin G Wilkins; Jennifer B Hamill; Hyungjin M Kim; John Y Kim; Richard J Greco; Ji Qi; Andrea L Pusic
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 2.  Implant-based breast reconstruction following conservative mastectomy: one-stage vs. two-stage approach.

Authors:  Maurice Y Nahabedian
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2016-02

Review 3.  Free Tissue Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Rami Dibbs; Jeff Trost; Valerie DeGregorio; Shayan Izaddoost
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 2.314

4.  Trends in post-mastectomy reconstruction: a SEER database analysis.

Authors:  Julie E Lang; Danielle E Summers; Haiyan Cui; Joseph N Carey; Rebecca K Viscusi; Craig A Hurst; Amy L Waer; Michele L B Ley; Stephen F Sener; Aparna Vijayasekaran
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 3.454

5.  Delayed two-stage breast reconstruction with implants: The authors' recent experience.

Authors:  Jan Rykała; Paweł Szychta; Julia Kruk-Jeromin
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2011

6.  Indocyanine green-based fluorescent angiography in breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Matthew Griffiths; Michael P Chae; Warren Matthew Rozen
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2016-04

Review 7.  Prosthetic breast reconstruction: indications and update.

Authors:  Tam T Quinn; George S Miller; Marie Rostek; Miguel S Cabalag; Warren M Rozen; David J Hunter-Smith
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2016-04

8.  Comparison of Outcomes in Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Versus Mastectomy Alone.

Authors:  Janelle Sousa; Ravi Sood; Daniel Liu; Kristine Calhoun; Otway Louie; Peter Neligan; Hakim Said; David Mathes
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 0.947

9.  Comparison of Wound Complications After Immediate, Delayed, and Secondary Breast Reconstruction Procedures.

Authors:  Margaret A Olsen; Katelin B Nickel; Ida K Fox; Julie A Margenthaler; Anna E Wallace; Victoria J Fraser
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 14.766

10.  Effect of Noninfectious Wound Complications after Mastectomy on Subsequent Surgical Procedures and Early Implant Loss.

Authors:  Katelin B Nickel; Ida K Fox; Julie A Margenthaler; Anna E Wallace; Victoria J Fraser; Margaret A Olsen
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 6.113

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.