Literature DB >> 22942657

Delayed two-stage breast reconstruction with implants: The authors' recent experience.

Jan Rykała1, Paweł Szychta, Julia Kruk-Jeromin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Presently, breast cancer detection is delayed in Poland and, thus, the only other option for patients is amputation and breast reconstruction (immediate or delayed). Reconstructive methods are based on using the patient's own tissue (pedicled or free myocutaneous flaps) or implants (a tissue expander, which is later exchanged for a prosthesis or an expandable implant).
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the aesthetic results of a delayed two-stage breast reconstruction with the use of implants (expander and prosthesis) in patients who have previously undergone cancer-related mastectomy.
METHODS: From 2006 to 2009, 54 patients (34 to 65 years of age) underwent reconstruction at least one year after their mastectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy; three women also received x-ray therapy. All women underwent a two-stage treatment with a tissue expander, which was later exchanged for a prosthesis.
RESULTS: Outcomes of the surgery (evaluated by the physician and the patient at least six months after all stages of reconstruction) were found to be very good in 42 patients and good in 12 patients. After amputation and x-ray therapy in two cases, a fistula developed, which necessitated implant removal.
CONCLUSIONS: After amputation, breast reconstruction with implants (expander and prosthesis) provides good aesthetic results. The method is mildly burdening to the patient and does not cause severe scarring. Symmetrization of the second breast is often recommended; however, the cost is not covered by the national health system. In principle, earlier x-ray therapy disqualifies the application of implants. Dividing reconstruction into two stages (expander and prosthesis) allows for possible correction of prosthesis placement.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast implant; Breast reconstruction; Delayed; Prosthesis; Tissue expander; Two stage

Year:  2011        PMID: 22942657      PMCID: PMC3269328          DOI: 10.1177/229255031101900306

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Plast Surg        ISSN: 1195-2199


  30 in total

Review 1.  New trends in breast cancer management: is the era of immediate breast reconstruction changing?

Authors:  Bohdan Pomahac; Abram Recht; James W May; Charles A Hergrueter; Sumner A Slavin
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 2.  Current options in breast reconstruction with or without radiotherapy.

Authors:  Jason Roostaeian; Christopher Crisera
Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.927

Review 3.  Radiation therapy and breast reconstruction: a critical review of the literature.

Authors:  Steven J Kronowitz; Geoffrey L Robb
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 4.  Current concepts in breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Ashley E Rawson; W Thomas McClellan
Journal:  W V Med J       Date:  2009-10

5.  A single surgeon's 12-year experience with tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction: part II. An analysis of long-term complications, aesthetic outcomes, and patient satisfaction.

Authors:  Peter G Cordeiro; Colleen M McCarthy
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  Quality of life and affective distress in women seeking immediate versus delayed breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer.

Authors:  Randy S Roth; Julie C Lowery; Jennifer Davis; Edwin G Wilkins
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  Complications in smokers after postmastectomy tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Susie J Goodwin; Colleen M McCarthy; Andrea L Pusic; Duc Bui; Michael Howard; Joseph J Disa; Peter G Cordeiro; Babak J Mehrara
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 1.539

8.  No differences in aesthetic outcome or patient satisfaction between anatomically shaped and round expandable implants in bilateral breast reconstructions: a randomized study.

Authors:  Jessica Gahm; Åsa Edsander-Nord; Göran Jurell; Marie Wickman
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  Pocket work for optimising outcomes in prosthetic breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Hugo D Loustau; Horacio F Mayer; Manuel Sarrabayrouse
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2008-03-20       Impact factor: 2.740

10.  A comparison of the cosmetic and psychological outcome of breast reconstruction, breast conserving surgery and mastectomy without reconstruction.

Authors:  R M Nicholson; S Leinster; E M Sassoon
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2007-03-26       Impact factor: 4.380

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.