Literature DB >> 18594092

Cost-effectiveness analysis of periacetabular osteotomy.

Emile Sharifi1, Husham Sharifi, Saam Morshed, Kevin Bozic, Mohammad Diab.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A lack of long-term outcomes data following periacetabular osteotomy makes it difficult for surgeons to recommend the most appropriate procedure to young patients who might be candidates for a joint-preserving procedure. In this study, we compared the cost-effectiveness of periacetabular osteotomy with total hip arthroplasty in terms of cost per quality-adjusted life year for the young adult.
METHODS: A decision model was constructed for a cost-utility analysis of periacetabular osteotomy compared with total hip arthroplasty. Outcome probabilities and effectiveness were derived from the literature. Effectiveness was expressed in quality-adjusted life years gained. Cost data were compiled and verified from our institution. Costs and utilities were discounted in accord with the United States Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. Principal outcome measures were average incremental costs, incremental effectiveness, incremental quality-adjusted life years, and net health benefits. Multivariate sensitivity analysis was used to assess the contribution of included variables in the model's outcomes.
RESULTS: For Tönnis grade-1 coxarthrosis, periacetabular osteotomy dominates with an average incremental cost-effectiveness of $7856 per quality-adjusted life year and an average incremental effectiveness of 0.15. For Tönnis grade-2 coxarthrosis, periacetabular osteotomy is, on the average, more cost-effective than total hip arthroplasty with an incremental cost-effectiveness of $824 per quality-adjusted life year, but it is less effective than total hip arthroplasty, on the average, with an incremental effectiveness of -1.4 quality-adjusted life years. Periacetabular osteotomy becomes more cost-effective at a longevity of 5.5 years for Tönnis grade-1 coxarthrosis and 18.25 years for Tönnis grade-2 coxarthrosis. In Tönnis grade-3 coxarthrosis, total hip replacement becomes the dominant treatment strategy.
CONCLUSIONS: Periacetabular osteotomy is, on the average, more cost-effective in Tönnis grade-1 and grade-2 coxarthrosis, while it is both more costly and less effective in Tönnis grade-3 coxarthrosis. These findings can inform clinical decision-making in the absence of long-term data. On the basis of this model, periacetabular osteotomy is preferable to total hip arthroplasty in Tönnis grade-1 and grade-2 coxarthrosis when the patient is sufficiently young and when functionality in sports is important.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18594092     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00730

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  13 in total

1.  Radiographic signs associated with femoroacetabular impingement occur with high prevalence at all ages in a hospital population.

Authors:  F de Bruin; M Reijnierse; V Farhang-Razi; J L Bloem
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-06-16       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Current status of cost utility analyses in total joint arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Benedict U Nwachukwu; Kevin J Bozic; William W Schairer; Jaime L Bernstein; David S Jevsevar; Robert G Marx; Douglas E Padgett
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Short-term complications have more effect on cost-effectiveness of THA than implant longevity.

Authors:  David W Shearer; Jiwon Youm; Kevin J Bozic
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  CADAVERIC STUDY ON THE LEARNING CURVE OF THE TWO-APPROACH GANZ PERIACETABULAR OSTEOTOMY.

Authors:  Fernando Portilho Ferro; Leandro Ejnisman; Helder Souza Miyahara; Christiano Augusto de Castro Trindade; Antônio Faga; José Ricardo Negreiros Vicente
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 0.513

Review 5.  Patient selection criteria for periacetabular osteotomy or rotational acetabular osteotomy.

Authors:  Yuji Yasunaga; Takuma Yamasaki; Mitsuo Ochi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Is hip arthroscopy cost-effective for femoroacetabular impingement?

Authors:  David W Shearer; Jonathan Kramer; Kevin J Bozic; Brian T Feeley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Periacetabular osteotomy for acetabular dysplasia in patients older than 40 years: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Michael B Millis; Michael Kain; Rafael Sierra; Robert Trousdale; Michael J Taunton; Young-Jo Kim; Scott B Rosenfeld; Ganesh Kamath; Perry Schoenecker; John C Clohisy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 8.  Curved periacetabular osteotomy for the treatment of dysplastic hips.

Authors:  Masatoshi Naito; Yoshinari Nakamura
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2014-05-16

9.  Cost analysis in shoulder arthroplasty surgery.

Authors:  Matthew J Teusink; Nazeem A Virani; John A Polikandriotis; Mark A Frankle
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2012-12-02

10.  Economic evaluation of access to musculoskeletal care: the case of waiting for total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Richard C Mather; Kevin T Hug; Lori A Orlando; Tyler Steven Watters; Lane Koenig; Ryan M Nunley; Michael P Bolognesi
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-01-18       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.