Literature DB >> 18593666

Nasal architecture: form and flow.

D J Doorly1, D J Taylor, A M Gambaruto, R C Schroter, N Tolley.   

Abstract

Current approaches to model nasal airflow are reviewed in this study, and new findings presented. These new results make use of improvements to computational and experimental techniques and resources, which now allow key dynamical features to be investigated, and offer rational procedures to relate variations in anatomical form. Specifically, both replica and simplified airways of a single subject were investigated and compared with the replica airways of two other individuals with overtly differing geometries. Procedures to characterize and compare complex nasal airway geometry are first outlined. It is then shown that coupled computational and experimental studies, capable of obtaining highly resolved data, reveal internal flow structures in both intrinsically steady and unsteady situations. The results presented demonstrate that the intimate relation between nasal form and flow can be explored in greater detail than hitherto possible. By outlining means to compare complex airway geometries and demonstrating the effects of rational geometric simplification on the flow structure, this work offers a fresh approach to studies of how natural conduits guide and control flow. The concepts and tools address issues that are thus generic to flow studies in other physiological systems.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18593666     DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2008.0083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci        ISSN: 1364-503X            Impact factor:   4.226


  15 in total

Review 1.  [Nasal-air conditioning].

Authors:  T Keck; A Rozsasi; P M Gruen
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 2.  The Landscape Ecology and Microbiota of the Human Nose, Mouth, and Throat.

Authors:  Diana M Proctor; David A Relman
Journal:  Cell Host Microbe       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 21.023

3.  Inflow boundary profile prescription for numerical simulation of nasal airflow.

Authors:  D J Taylor; D J Doorly; R C Schroter
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Effects of CT resolution and radiodensity threshold on the CFD evaluation of nasal airflow.

Authors:  Maurizio Quadrio; Carlotta Pipolo; Stefano Corti; Francesco Messina; Chiara Pesci; Alberto M Saibene; Samuele Zampini; Giovanni Felisati
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  [Numerical flow simulation : A new method for assessing nasal breathing].

Authors:  T Hildebrandt; J Osman; L Goubergrits
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.284

6.  Numerical Comparison of Nasal Aerosol Administration Systems for Efficient Nose-to-Brain Drug Delivery.

Authors:  Jingliang Dong; Yidan Shang; Kiao Inthavong; Hak-Kim Chan; Jiyuan Tu
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 4.200

7.  Assessment of nasal septoplasty using NOSE and RhinoQoL questionnaires.

Authors:  Michel Mondina; Magali Marro; Sylvie Maurice; Dominique Stoll; Ludovic de Gabory
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Computational modeling and validation of human nasal airflow under various breathing conditions.

Authors:  Chengyu Li; Jianbo Jiang; Haibo Dong; Kai Zhao
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Computer simulations show that Neanderthal facial morphology represents adaptation to cold and high energy demands, but not heavy biting.

Authors:  Stephen Wroe; William C H Parr; Justin A Ledogar; Jason Bourke; Samuel P Evans; Luca Fiorenza; Stefano Benazzi; Jean-Jacques Hublin; Chris Stringer; Ottmar Kullmer; Michael Curry; Todd C Rae; Todd R Yokley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  The role of biofluid mechanics in the assessment of clinical and pathological observations: sixth International Bio-Fluid Mechanics Symposium and Workshop, March 28-30, 2008 Pasadena, California.

Authors:  Maria Siebes; Yiannis Ventikos
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 3.934

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.