Literature DB >> 26059996

Effects of CT resolution and radiodensity threshold on the CFD evaluation of nasal airflow.

Maurizio Quadrio1, Carlotta Pipolo2, Stefano Corti3, Francesco Messina2, Chiara Pesci3, Alberto M Saibene2, Samuele Zampini3, Giovanni Felisati2.   

Abstract

The article focuses on the robustness of a CFD-based procedure for the quantitative evaluation of the nasal airflow. CFD ability to yield robust results with respect to the unavoidable procedural and modeling inaccuracies must be demonstrated to allow this tool to become part of the clinical practice in this field. The present article specifically addresses the sensitivity of the CFD procedure to the spatial resolution of the available CT scans, as well as to the choice of the segmentation level of the CT images. We found no critical problems concerning these issues; nevertheless, the choice of the segmentation level is potentially delicate if carried out by an untrained operator.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computer simulation; Fluid dynamics; Nasal cavities

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26059996     DOI: 10.1007/s11517-015-1325-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  29 in total

Review 1.  A review of the implications of computational fluid dynamic studies on nasal airflow and physiology.

Authors:  S C Leong; X B Chen; H P Lee; D Y Wang
Journal:  Rhinology       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.681

Review 2.  Review of computational fluid dynamics in the assessment of nasal air flow and analysis of its limitations.

Authors:  Maurizio Quadrio; Carlotta Pipolo; Stefano Corti; Riccardo Lenzi; Francesco Messina; Chiara Pesci; Giovanni Felisati
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 3.  Adult chronic rhinosinusitis: surgical outcomes and the role of endoscopic sinus surgery.

Authors:  David M Poetker; Timothy L Smith
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.064

4.  Assessment of airflow ventilation in human nasal cavity and maxillary sinus before and after targeted sinonasal surgery: a numerical case study.

Authors:  Jian Hua Zhu; Kian Meng Lim; Kim Thye Mark Thong; De Yun Wang; Heow Pueh Lee
Journal:  Respir Physiol Neurobiol       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 1.931

5.  Retrospective analysis of the effectiveness of functional endoscopic sinus surgery in the treatment of adult chronic rhinisinusitis refractory to medical treatment.

Authors:  T Shivakumar; A P Sambandan
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-04-11

6.  Velocity profiles measured for airflow through a large-scale model of the human nasal cavity.

Authors:  I Hahn; P W Scherer; M M Mozell
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1993-11

7.  Epidemiology and burden of nasal congestion.

Authors:  Michael Stewart; Bj Ferguson; Len Fromer
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2010-04-08

8.  Effect of anatomy on human nasal air flow and odorant transport patterns: implications for olfaction.

Authors:  Kai Zhao; Peter W Scherer; Shoreh A Hajiloo; Pamela Dalton
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.160

Review 9.  Nasal dyspnea: the place of rhinomanometry in its objective assessment.

Authors:  Michael J Schumacher
Journal:  Am J Rhinol       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb

Review 10.  Objective monitoring of nasal patency and nasal physiology in rhinitis.

Authors:  Robert A Nathan; Ron Eccles; Peter H Howarth; Sverre K Steinsvåg; Alkis Togias
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 10.793

View more
  8 in total

1.  Normative ranges of nasal airflow variables in healthy adults.

Authors:  Azadeh A T Borojeni; Guilherme J M Garcia; Masoud Gh Moghaddam; Dennis O Frank-Ito; Julia S Kimbell; Purushottam W Laud; Lisa J Koenig; John S Rhee
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Comparison of rhinomanometric and computational fluid dynamic assessment of nasal resistance with respect to measurement accuracy.

Authors:  Nora Schmidt; Hans Behrbohm; Leonid Goubergrits; Thomas Hildebrandt; Jan Brüning
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 3.421

3.  Narrowed Posterior Nasal Airway Limits Efficacy of Anterior Septoplasty.

Authors:  David A Campbell; Masoud Gh Moghaddam; John S Rhee; Guilherme J M Garcia
Journal:  Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med       Date:  2020-05-29

4.  Sensitivity of nasal airflow variables computed via computational fluid dynamics to the computed tomography segmentation threshold.

Authors:  Giancarlo B Cherobin; Richard L Voegels; Eloisa M M S Gebrim; Guilherme J M Garcia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Thermal water delivery in the nose: experimental results describing droplet deposition through computational fluid dynamics.

Authors:  E F M Buijs; V Covello; C Pipolo; A M Saibene; G Felisati; M Quadrio
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 2.124

6.  Through The Back Door: Expiratory Accumulation of SARS-Cov-2 in the Olfactory Mucosa as Mechanism for CNS Penetration.

Authors:  Carlotta Pipolo; Antonio Mario Bulfamante; Andrea Schillaci; Jacopo Banchetti; Luca Castellani; Alberto Maria Saibene; Giovanni Felisati; Maurizio Quadrio
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 3.738

7.  A preoperative predictive study of advantages of airway changes after maxillomandibular advancement surgery using computational fluid dynamics analysis.

Authors:  Kanako Yamagata; Keiji Shinozuka; Shouhei Ogisawa; Akio Himejima; Hiroaki Azaki; Shuichi Nishikubo; Takako Sato; Masaaki Suzuki; Tadashi Tanuma; Morio Tonogi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-11       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Characterization of the Airflow within an Average Geometry of the Healthy Human Nasal Cavity.

Authors:  Jan Brüning; Thomas Hildebrandt; Werner Heppt; Nora Schmidt; Hans Lamecker; Angelika Szengel; Natalja Amiridze; Heiko Ramm; Matthias Bindernagel; Stefan Zachow; Leonid Goubergrits
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.