Literature DB >> 18593413

An Eastern perspective on oesophageal perforation: a high incidence of ingested bones.

Kevin K Sng1, Adrian J H Koh, Ngian-Chye Tan, Su-Ming Tan, Khoon-Hean Tay.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Oesophageal perforation is uncommon, with controversy surrounding its optimal management. Our local experience shows a high incidence of oesophageal perforation secondary to ingested bones.
METHODS: Fourteen patients with oesophageal perforation treated at Changi General Hospital in Singapore between January 1996 and December 2006 were retrospectively reviewed.
RESULTS: The median age was 52 years (16-79 years), with eight men and six women. There were 11 thoracic perforations and 3 cervical perforations. Ten perforations were the result of foreign body ingestion, three were spontaneous and only one was iatrogenic. The offending foreign body was a fish bone in five patients, a chicken bone in four and a tooth in one. Three of our 14 patients were treated surgically. The remaining 11 patients were treated non-operatively. All nine patients with fish or chicken bone perforation were treated conservatively, except two in whom conservative therapy failed and they subsequently required surgery. The median length of hospital stay was 7 days (2-109 days). There was one death.
CONCLUSION: Oesophageal perforation requires prompt diagnosis and treatment. Most of our oesophageal perforations are secondary to ingested bones. Such cases can often be treated conservatively in our experience.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18593413     DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2008.04575.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ANZ J Surg        ISSN: 1445-1433            Impact factor:   1.872


  7 in total

1.  A prospective study of epidemiological risk factors for ingestion of fish bones in Singapore.

Authors:  Shalini Arulanandam; Soumen Das De; Jeevendra Kanagalingam
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.858

2.  Perforation of esophagus and subsequent mediastinitis following mussel shell ingestion.

Authors:  Il Hwan Park; Hyun Kyo Lim; Seung Woo Song; Kwang Ho Lee
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 3.  Food bolus and oesophageal foreign body: a summary of the evidence and proposed management process.

Authors:  Thomas J Stubington; Tawakir Kamani
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 4.  Current treatment and outcome of esophageal perforations in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of 75 studies.

Authors:  Fausto Biancari; Vito D'Andrea; Rosalba Paone; Carlo Di Marco; Grazia Savino; Vesa Koivukangas; Juha Saarnio; Ersilia Lucenteforte
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Aggressive surgical treatment in late-diagnosed esophageal perforation: a report of 11 cases.

Authors:  Rahim Mahmodlou; Isa Abdirad; Mohammad Ghasemi-Rad
Journal:  ISRN Surg       Date:  2011-06-22

6.  Successful surgical treatment of a spontaneous rupture of the esophagus diagnosed two days after onset.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Ando; Yoshinori Shitara; Kei Hagiwara; Keigo Hara; Yasushi Mogami; Tsutomu Kobayashi; Toshiki Yajima; Masachika Tani; Nobuhiro Morinaga; Masatoshi Ishizaki; Hiroyuki Kuwano
Journal:  Case Rep Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-05-08

7.  Flexible versus rigid endoscopy in the management of esophageal foreign body impaction: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Davide Ferrari; Alberto Aiolfi; Gianluca Bonitta; Carlo Galdino Riva; Emanuele Rausa; Stefano Siboni; Francesco Toti; Luigi Bonavina
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 5.469

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.